A collision warning system (CWS) facilitates timely crash-avoidance behaviours by providing real-time warnings to drivers about imminent collisions. Despite its potential benefits in terms of both shorter response times and ability to maintain longer headways, its adoption has been slow. Smartphone-based collision warning applications (CWAs) may assist in stimulating wider adoption of collision warning technology, as they are much less expensive and are accessible in many types of smartphones. However, driver behaviour with CWAs has never been studied.
Aim: This study explored the behaviour of 26 drivers in the initial 2–3 weeks of using a CWA, with respect to (1) their responses (speed behaviour) to the warnings they received, and (2) the number of warnings they received over time.
Method: Drivers were asked to install a CWA on their smartphone and share their trip data in return for monetary rewards. The data logged by the CWA included instantaneous speed and the time-stamped warnings that were received during the trips. The analysis employed several linear and non-linear regression models.
Results: The CWA generated safer behaviours: drivers lowered their speed when warnings were issued and maintained safer headway distance over time. In view of the high penetration rate of smartphones, it is suggested that ways to further test and use CWAs be developed.
collision warning systems, driver behaviour
 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic safety facts 2006: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system (NHTSA Publication No. DOT- HS-810-818). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006.
 Dingus, T.A., Jahns, S.K., Horowitz, A.D. & Knipling, R., Human factors design issues for crash avoidance systems. In Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems, eds. W. Barfield & T.A. Dingus, Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, pp. 55–94, 1998.
 Lee, J.D., Hoffman, J.D. & Hayes, E., Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM: New York, pp. 65–72, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/985692.985701
 Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L. & Reyes, M.L., Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44, pp. 314–334, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497844
 Mohebbi, R., Gray, R. & Tan, H.Z., Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone. Human Factors, 51(1), pp. 102–110, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720809333517
 Ben-Yaacov, A., Maltz, M. & Shinar, D., Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance. Human Factors, 44, pp. 335–342, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/0018720024497925
 Bao, S., LeBlanc, D.J., Sayer, J.R. & Flannagan, C., Heavy-truck drivers’ following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: A field evaluation. Human Factors, 54, pp. 687–697, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812439412
 Dingus, T.A., McGehee, D.V., Mankkal, N., Jahns, S.K., Carney, C. & Hankey, J.M. Human factors field evaluation of automotive headway maintenance/collision warning devices. Human Factors, 39, 216–229, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872097778543930
 Shahar, R., Actuarial Research on the Effectiveness of Collision Avoidance Systems, 2013, available at http://www.ron-ai.com/maagar.php?op=page&id=12, (accessed 2 November 2015).
 National Transportation Safety Board, The Use of Forward Collision Avoidance Systems to Prevent and Mitigate Rear-End Crashes (NTSB Report NTSB/SIR-15/01), Washington, DC: NTSB, 2015.
 Williams, T., NTSB Calls for Immediate Action on Collision Avoidance Systems for Vehicles; Cites Slow Progress as Major Safety Issue, NTSB Press Release, 2015, available at http://www.ntsb.gov/news/press-releases/Pages/PR20150608b.aspx
 Ren Z.Q., Wang, C. & He, J., Vehicle detection using Android smartphones. 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Bolton Landing: New York, 2013.
 IDC, Smartphone Shipments Reach Second Highest Level for a Single Quarter as Worldwide Volumes Reach 355.2 Million in the Third Quarter, 2015. available at http:// www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS25988815 (accessed 28 October 2015).
 ITU, ICT facts and figures. 2015. available at http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/ Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2015.pdf
 Albert, G., Musicant, O. & Lotan, T.A., “Safety Suit” for smartphone apps: what do the experts say? The 4th International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention (DDI2015), Sydney, Australia, November, 2015.
 Astley, S.M., Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompting techniques for mammography. British Journal of Radiology, 78, pp. 20–25, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/37221979
 Bliss, J.P., Investigation of alarm-related accidents and incidents in aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, pp. 249–268, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327108IJAP1303_04
 Bliss, J.P. & Acton, S.A., Alarm mistrust in automobiles: How collision alarm reliability affects driving. Applied Ergonomics, 34, pp. 499–509, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2003.07.003
 Hauer, E. & Bamfo, J., Two tools for finding what function links the dependent variable to the explanatory variables. International Cooperation on Theories and Concepts in Traffic, Lund: Sweden, 1997.
 Aarts, L. & Van Schagen, I., Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: A review. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(2), pp. 215–224, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.004