Muna Hameed Alturaihi | Mahmoud Atallah Mashkour* | Sanaa Turki Mousa AL-Musawi
© 2022 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
With the development of the uses of hydrocarbon compounds in many industrial fields, especially in the field of energy liberation through oxidation of gases, as previous research specialized in improving the combustion processes of gases by adding particles of other gases that contribute to improving the combustion of these compounds in terms of temperatures and speed of flame combustion. The previous study aimed to improve the flame speed by adding different gases to several compounds. In this research paper, propane gas C3H8 is used as the main gas to improve its combustion properties. N2 and H2 gas were added in different proportions, through which a clear effect on the combustion properties can be seen in terms of combustion speed. Flames and exhaust as CO and NOx. As the auxiliary gases were added in this improvement at rates of 20%, 30% and 40%, and then these tests were analyzed, where it was concluded that H2 gas clearly contributed to improving the combustion speed of the flame, as the flame combustion velocity reached 58.3 cm/s by 40%.
CHEMKIN, burning velocity, laminar, propane-air mixture, NO ppm, Co ppm
The impact of sulfur on two responses over Pt/Al2O3 and C3H8±NO±O2 has been examined. Presentation of SO2 (0±100 ppm) into the response feed represses one response yet not the other. Action gets back to its unique level when SO2 is taken out [1]. A progression of Pt/γ- Al2O3 impetuses advanced by different convergences of Na were ready and tried for the SCR of NO by propene and propane under lean-consume conditions. Under a C3H8/NO/O2 air, the presence of Na prompts an extreme lessening of the C3H8 and NO changes [2]. No exhaustive audit exists that considers and assesses the entirety of the accessible writing information. A numerical expectation of the C3H6/ C3H8 upper bound bend was additionally evolved. An audit is important to characterize the difficulties that should be defeated to accomplish sufficient division execution [3]. Physicists have provided new information on the impacts of positive fire stretch on laminar consuming speeds, and conditions for progress to shaky blazes. New estimations for H2/O2/N2 combinations at values of fire stretch up to 7600 s-1 [4]. An investigation of compatibility dependent on both the Wobble Index and the laminar consuming speed among methane and flammable gas has also been carried out [5]. Laminar consuming speeds were estimated with the hotness motion technique at encompassing conditions inside an equality proportion of 0.6-1.6. Another correlation SL/SL0=(1+αYenr+βY2enr) was gotten from the reproductions and approved with analyze results. Part II will examine the worldwide fire boundaries and the instruments of dilution, thermal and synthetic impacts of diluents [6]. Worldwide fire boundaries including adiabatic fire temperature (Tad), in general response request (n) initiation energy (Ea), Zeldovich number (Ze) and Lewis number (Le) were determined [7]. Combinations of hydrogen, methane and propane displayed to have almost a similar laminar consuming speed (SL0=25 cm/s) for stretched flares [8]. The impact of temperature, contact time, and reactant fixation on the energy of NO decrease by C3H8under lean consume conditions over Pt/ Al2O3 has been explored. A motor model which acceptably fits the information has been created and infers that NO separation on the Pt surface isn't a major route [9]. Carbon dioxide (CO2) influences laminar consuming pace and solidness of the fire for methane (CH4) and propane (C3H8). Combinations of CH4 and CO2, otherwise called biogas, are considered as minimal expense elective fills [10]. This review analyzes poly (pyrrolone-imide) copolymers for the O2/N2, CO2/ CH4, and C3H6/ C3H8 partition. It was intended to give unbending nature and beneficial mechanical properties notwithstanding top notch gas transport properties [11]. The ignition qualities and response instrument of combinations containing nitrogen trifluoride (NF3) were researched. Examinations of the response instrument uncovered the significant response pathways that include the disintegration of NF3, the oxidation and chain-fluoridation of H2 and CH4 [12]. For lean C2H4–air and C3H8–air combinations, tempestuous consuming speeds were estimated for Bunsen-type premixed blazes balanced out in a high-pressure chamber keeping the chamber pressure steady. The tests were performed for a strain range up to 1.0 MPa and for a scope of u8/SL up to 25 [13]. Laminar non-premixed and premixed flares are balanced out in the counter flow setup. Basic states of auto ignition are estimated by expanding the stream paces of the counter flowing streams. Mathematical estimations are performed utilizing a point-by-point synthetic active mechanism [14]. The defining moment in a fire is when the consuming speed falls to under 20 cm/s and the fire breadth increases dramatically. With a similar oxygen content and proportionality proportion, by supplanting half or all of the N2 diluent with CO2, the fire temperature and consuming speed decline fundamentally [15]. An air-blast atomizer was designed and developed for fuel atomization which was used in liquid fuel burner [16]. The experiments have been performed for different liquid fuel types, air to liquid mass flow rates (ALR) and equivalence ratio (φ) to study the effects of these parameters on burning velocity (BV). The liquid fuels used during the tests are biodiesel (sunflower fatty acid methyl ester SME) and its blends (biodiesel-diesel Bx and biodiesel-kerosene Bkx) with three values of ALR (0.6, 0.8 and 1.0) for five values of φ (0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.4). The image viewing regions is 366.6 mm2 for determine the (BV). The results showed that the increasing of biodiesel ratio in blending with diesel and kerosene decreases the (BV), and the increasing of ALR increases the (BV) for all experiments fuels.
By fluctuating the stream pace of the gas blend, a suitable amount of gas speed could be tracked down where net heat motion is zero. The temperature circulation of the burner plate is estimated with the thermocouples joined to it and the outspread temperature profile of the plate acquired by addressing the energy Eq. (1):
$T_p(r)=T_{\text {center }}-\frac{q}{4 \lambda x_p} r^2$ (1)
where, Tp is the temperature profile across the burner plate, T center is the plate place temperature, q is the net hotness transition into the plate, λ is the warm conductivity of burner plate, xp is the plate thickness and r are the outspread direction. Eq. (1) is communicated in the accompanying general structure:
$T_p(r)=T_{\text {center }}+a r^2$ (2)
The coefficient a relies upon the unburned gas speed v. By plotting an against v, the adiabatic consuming speed SL can be found by addition to a=0. The PREMIX code was utilized to compute laminar fire speeds and to contrast them with our test results. PREMIX utilizes a mixture time coordinating/Newton emphasis method to address the consistent state of mass, species, and energy preservation conditions and can reenact the spreading fire. Conditions were addressed by utilizing the TWOPNT, a limit esteem issue solver in the CHEMKIN. One of the basic components for reenactment is the legitimate response instrument, which can depict the fundamental, crucial response ways followed by the general response. The compound active instrument utilized is the GRI-MECH instrument. GRI-MECH is an advanced point-by-point compound response instrument for the estimation of petroleum gas compound response processes, and the most recent variant is GRIMECH 3.0. GRI-MECH 3.0 comprises 325 rudimentary compound responses with related rate coefficient articulations and thermochemical compound boundaries for 53 species. It incorporates the itemized burning response instrument for hydrogen. The scope of GRI-MECH 3.0 is 1000-2500 K in temperature and 1 atm in pressure. The underlying stream pace of the unburned blend was picked to be equivalent to 0.04 g/cm2s, as per the estimation of stoichiometric proban/air fire speed. To begin the emphasis, the temperature profile assessment for a stoichiometric proban/air fire was embraced, as recommended. The temperature profile comes about because the principal recreation step was utilized for the following stage. The channel limit temperature (300 K), pressure (0.1 MPa), and structure of the unburned blend were set. At the limit, it was determined that all angles would evaporate. It is seen that by utilizing versatile framework boundaries such as GRAD=0.02 and CURV=0.1, the consuming speed acquired is matrix free. The hydrogen mole portions, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide (from 20 to 40%) will be evaluated, along with other components found in unburned combinations of hydrogen proban/air, nitrogen-proban/air, and carbon dioxide methane/air. The length of computation has been respected to 12 cm before the spot of response or, by and large, equivalent to 12 cm. The protection of mass is communicated by the overall progression condition:
$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot(\rho u)=0$ (3)
where, ρ is the blend mass thickness and u is the gas blend speed. The preservation of force, with no body powers other than gravity, is covered by:
$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot(\rho u u)=\nabla \cdot \Pi+\rho g$ (4)
where, Π is the pressure tensor and g is the speed increase due to gravity. The pressure tensor comprises of a hydrodynamic and gooey part Π=-pI+τ, in which p is the tension, I the unit tensor and τ the gooey pressure tensor. The condition depicting the preservation of energy is written as far as explicit enthalpy h:
$\frac{\partial \rho h}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot(\rho u h)=\frac{\partial p}{\partial t}+u \cdot \nabla p+\tau:(\nabla u)-\nabla \cdot q$ (5)
where, q is the complete hotness motion. The term τ∇u addresses the enthalpy creation because of thick impacts. When substance responses are to be thought of, preservation conditions for the species mass portions Yi are utilized. They are characterized as Y=ii/ρρ with ρi the thickness of species I. The thickness of the blend ρ is connected with the thickness of the different species by:
$\rho=\sum_{i=1}^{N_s} \rho_i$ (6)
with Ns the quantity of species. This prompts a preservation condition for each specie mass part in the combination:
$\frac{\partial \rho Y_i}{\partial t}+\nabla \cdot\left(\rho u Y_i\right)+\nabla \cdot\left(\rho U_i Y_i\right)=\dot{\omega}_i, i \in\left[1, N_s\right]$ (7)
with Ui is the dispersion speed of species I. The substance source term ωi in this situation, is trademark for the receptive idea of the stream. Note that Eq. (7) along with the congruity Eq. (3) gives an over-complete framework, so all things considered of Ns just Ns-1 conditions in Eq. (7) must be tackled. The mass part of one of the animal types can be registered utilizing the accompanying requirement:
$\sum_{i=1}^{N_s} Y_i=1$ (8)
A bountiful substance, for example nitrogen, is generally picked for this substance. By definition compound responses are mass moderating, so thusly the accompanying relations hold:
$\sum_{i=1}^{N_s} \rho Y_i U_i=0$ (9)
$\sum_{i=1}^{N_s} \dot{\omega}_i=0$ (10)
At last, state conditions are expected to finish the arrangement of differential conditions (4)-(7). The principal state condition presents the particular enthalpy h as a component of temperature T. This connection is given by:
$h=\sum_{i=1}^{N_s} Y_i h_i$ with $h_i=h_i^{\mathrm{ref}}+\int_{T^{\text {ref }}}^T c_{p_i}(T) d T$ (11)
Also holds for amazing gases. In this situation greetings addresses the enthalpy of species I and ref hello there the arrangement enthalpy of species I at a reference an incentive for the temperature ref T and I p c the particular hotness limit at consistent strain of species I. The blend heat limit is characterized by:
$c_p=\sum_{i=1}^{N_S} Y_i c_{p_i}$ (12)
The species heat limit cpi is regularly arranged in polynomial structure. In most ignition issues the combination also its parts are considered to act as awesome gases. The ideal-gas law relates the thickness, temperature also strain to one another by:
$\rho=\frac{p \bar{M}}{R T}$ (13)
with R the all-inclusive gas consistent and M the mean molar mass.
$\bar{M}=\left(\sum_{i=1}^{N_s} \frac{Y_i}{M_i}\right)^{-1}$ (14)
The process of improving hydrocarbon compounds lies in the addition of different gases that increase the speed of combustion of flames and temperatures, especially that the increase in combustion temperatures leads to an increase in harmful emissions to the environment such as co and NOX gas. Where propane gas was used and certain percentages of H2 and N2 gas was added.
Through Figure 1, notice the significant effect of adding gases on the combustion process, and consequently its great impact on the speed of combustion of the flame. The results proved the ability of H2 gas to improve the speed of combustion of the flame, as the velocity of flame combustion at 40% of H2 gas reached 58 cm/s. We note the effect of N2 gas on the combustion process, which led to a decrease in the combustion velocity of the flame, and the combustion velocity of the flame reached 48.9 cm/s, where it is known that the speed of flame combustion of propane gas alone without additives was 52 cm/s.
Figure 1. Laminar flame speed with Equivalence Ratio
Figure 2. Density with Equivalence Ratio
Through Figure 2, we notice the effect of additions on the density in general, as H2 gas greatly affects the combustion process as it affects the density of gases in general when added. As the speed of flame combustion led to a rise in temperatures and thus the density decreased significantly as shown in Figure 2. The density of propane gas without additives is 0.0012 g/cm3 when Equivalence Ratio is equal to 1. where we note that the density value has changed significantly and decreased at the lowest value, which is when hydrogen gas is added by 40% where its value was 0.00117 g/cm3.
Figure 3. Temperature with Equivalence Ratio
Through the temperature chart, Figure 3, we notice the effect of hydrogen gas compared to the effect of nitrogen gas on the combustion process. It was found that hydrogen gas had a significant effect on the combustion of propane gas, as it led to an increase in temperature due to an increase in the speed of flame combustion, where temperatures reached 2280 K at 40% of hydrogen gas compared to the combustion of propane gas alone, as this improvement is one of the most important reasons for using hydrogen gas in many industrial fields.
Figure 4. NOX with Equivalence Ratio
The benefits of improving the combustion of propane gas are also accompanied by negatives, as one of the most important negatives that accompany the process of improving the combustion of propane gas when adding improvement gases to it are harmful emissions to the environment such as NOX and CO gas. The value of NOX in the case of adding hydrogen gas reached 40% to 396 ppm, which is considered a very high percentage of harmful emissions to the environment in Figure 4. Also, when adding nitrogen gas, we get a lower value of emissions than in propane gas alone, where the percentage of NOX reached 300 ppm, which is relatively few and better in terms of damage. Environmental.
Figure 5. CO with Equivalence Ratio
Carbon monoxide gas is one of the unwanted emissions in the combustion process, as it distorts the shape of the flame and is harmful to the environment. Through the previous Figure 5, note that the value of carbon monoxide increases when burning propane gas alone, and the addition process improves the reduction of this emission as the value of carbon monoxide gas when burning propane gas alone is 106,000 ppm, and adding nitrogen gas helps greatly to reduce emissions, as the percentage of carbon monoxide gas reached 101,000 ppm at 40%, which is relatively low compared to burning propane gas alone.
(1) The velocity of flame combustion at 40% of H2 gas reached 58 cm/s. We note the effect of N2 gas on the combustion process, which led to a decrease in the combustion velocity. The combustion velocity of the flame reached 48.9 cm/s when using propane gas alone without additives.
(2) The density of propane gas without additives is 0.0012 g/cm3 when Equivalence Ratio is equal to 1, where we note that the density value has changed significantly and decreased at the lowest value, which is when hydrogen gas is added by 40%.
(3) Hydrogen gas leads to an increase in temperature due to the speed of flame combustion, where temperatures reach 2280 K at 40% of hydrogen gas compared to the combustion of propane gas alone. This improvement is one of the most important reasons for using hydrogen gas in many industrial fields.
(4) The value of NOX in the case of adding hydrogen gas reached 40% to 396 ppm, which is considered a very high percentage of harmful emissions to the environment. Also, when adding nitrogen gas, we get a lower value of emissions than in propane gas alone.
(5) The value of carbon monoxide gas increases when burning propane gas alone, and the addition process improves the reduction of this emission. Adding nitrogen gas helps greatly to reduce emissions, as it reduces the number of harmful CO2 emissions by 40%, at a cost of about 10,000 ppm.
[1] Burch, R., Watling, T.C. (1998). The effect of sulphur on the reduction of NO by C3H6 and C3H8 over Pt/ Al2O3 under lean-burn conditions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 17(1-2): 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(98)00007-1
[2] Vernoux, P., Leinekugel-Le-Cocq, A.Y., Gaillard, F. (2003). Effect of the addition of Na to Pt/ Al2O3 catalysts for the reduction of NO by C3H8 and C3H6 under lean-burn conditions. Journal of Catalysis, 219(1): 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9517(03)00200-8
[3] Burns, R.L., Koros, W.J. (2003). Defining the challenges for C3H6/C3H8 separation using polymeric membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 211(2): 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388(02)00430-1
[4] Kwon, S., Tseng, L.K., Faeth, G.M. (1992). Laminar burning velocities and transition to unstable flames in H2/O2/N2 and C3H8/O2/N2 mixtures. Combustion and Flame, 90(3-4): 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90085-4
[5] Cardona, C.A., Amell, A.A. (2013). Laminar burning velocity and interchangeability analysis of biogas/C3H8/H2 with normal and oxygen-enriched air. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(19): 7994-8001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.094
[6] Zhou, J., Liu, G., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Liu, J., Cen, K. (2020). Adiabatic laminar burning velocities of C3H8-O2-CO2 and C3H8-O2-N2 mixtures at ambient conditions-PART I: Experimental and numerical study. Fuel, 263: 116533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116533
[7] Liu, G., Zhou, J., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Liu, J., Cen, K. (2020). Adiabatic laminar burning velocities of C3H8-O2-CO2 and C3H8-O2-N2 mixtures at ambient conditions-PART II: Mechanistic interpretation. Fuel, 276: 117946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117946
[8] Nakahara, M., Abe, F., Tokunaga, K., Ishihara, A. (2013). Fundamental burning velocities of meso-scale propagating spherical flames with H2, CH4 and C3H8 mixtures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 34(1): 703-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.08.007
[9] Burch, R., Watling, T.C. (1997). Kinetics and Mechanism of the Reduction of NO by C3H8 over Pt/Al2O3 under Lean-Burn Conditions. Journal of Catalysis, 169(1): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1997.1686
[10] Wang, Z., Yelishala, S.C., Yu, G., Metghalchi, H., Levendis, Y.A. (2019). Effects of carbon dioxide on laminar burning speed and flame instability of methane/air and propane/air mixtures: a literature review. Energy & Fuels, 33(10): 9403-9418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02346
[11] Burns, R.L., Koros, W.J. (2003). Structure−property relationships for poly (pyrrolone-imide) gas separation membranes. Macromolecules, 36(7): 2374-2381. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0259261
[12] Matsugi, A., Shiina, H., Takahashi, A., Tsuchiya, K., Miyoshi, A. (2014). Burning velocities and kinetics of H2/ NF3/ N2, CH4/ NF3/ N2, and C3H8/ NF3/ N2 flames. Combustion and Flame, 161(6): 1425-1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.12.001
[13] Kobayashi, H., Kawabata, Y., Maruta, K. (1998). Experimental study on general correlation of turbulent burning velocity at high pressure. In Symposium (International) on Combustion, 27(1): 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(98)80492-x
[14] Humer, S., Seiser, R., Seshadri, K. (2002). Non-premixed and premixed extinction and autoignition of C2H4, C2H6, C3H6, and C3H8. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 29(2): 1597-1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1540-7489(02)80196-1
[15] Zhao, X., Shi, B., Peng, W., Cao, Q., Xie, D., Dong, W., Wang, N. (2019). Effects of N2 and CO2 dilution on the combustion characteristics of C3H8/O2 mixture in a swirl tubular flame burner. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 100: 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.09.009
[16] Mohammed, A. (2018). Burning velocity measurement of biodiesel fuel and its blends using particle imaging path technique and image processing. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, The Fourth Scientific Engineering and First Sustainable Engineering Conference.
