Introduction: With the rapid development of the civil aviation industry and the growth in the number of airline employees, some unsafe and dishonest events occur frequently. These behaviors affect the flight safety seriously. Method: First of all, the connotation of safety integrity was defined based on literature analysis. According to the connotation, relevant typical cases were collected. Through the use of Field Theory for case analysis, the main factors that affect safety integrity were identified. By using DEMATEL-G1 and DEMATEL-ISM methods, the relationships between these factors were analyzed quantitatively, and the internal effect paths of the influencing factors were established. Results: There are sixteen major factors that affect the safety integrity of airline employees. Six of them are crucial. The effect path system of all factors can be divided into four layers: the first layer is the appearance layer, including eight factors, which are the direct causes affecting airline employee’s safety integrity; the second layer is the middle layer; the third and the fourth layers are the root layers, including four factors, which are the deep causes affecting airline employee’s safety integrity. It is also worth noticing that “incentive and penalty system of safety integrity”, “supervision of government and company”,“ stability and efficiency of the organization”,“ emphasis and example of leaders on safety integrity” are not only crucial factors, but also the root layers of the structural model. They are the most important factors.
airline employees, case analysis, DEMATEL-G1, DEMATEL-ISM, Field Theory, hierarchical structure model, influencing factors, safety integrity
 Special report: fleet watch 2017- a review of commercial aircraft orders and deliveries for 2016. Flight Global, 28 Feb 2017, available at: http://dashboard.flightglobal.com
 Cunningham, M.R. & Ash, P., The structure of honesty: factor analysis of the Reid report. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3(1), pp. 54–66, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01016748
 Ones ,D.S. & Viswesvaran, C., Gender, age and race differences on overt integrity tests: analyses across four large-scale applicant data sets. Psychology, 83(1), pp. 35–42, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.1.35
 Marcus, B., Höft, S. & Riediger, M., Integrity tests and the five-factor model of personality: a review and empirical test of two alternative positions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2), pp. 113–130, 2006.
 Byle, K.A. & Holtgraves, T.M., Integrity testing, personality, and design: interpreting the personnel reaction blank. Journal of Business & Psychology, 22(4), pp. 287–295, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9059-z
 Mcfarland, L.A. & Ryan, A.M., Variance in faking across non cognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), pp. 812–821, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.5.812
 Alliger, G.M. & Dwight, S.A., A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(1), pp. 59–72, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970367
 Farisi, M.I., Academic dishonesty in distance higher education: challenges and models for moral education in the digital era. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), pp. 176–195, 2013.
 Kisamore, J.L., Stone, T.H. & Jawahar, I.M., Academic integrity: the relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), pp. 381–394, 2007.
 Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press, 2002.
 Dudzinski, D.M., Integrity: principled coherence, virtue, or both? The Journal of Value Inquiry, 38(3), pp. 299–313, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-005-3337-z
 Vinnem, J.E., Offshore Risk Assessment vol 1: Principles, Modelling and Applications of QRA Studies, Springer-Verlag: London and New York, pp. 89, 2010.
 Palanski, M.E. & Yammarino, F.J., Integrity and leadership: clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25(3), pp. 171–184, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.04.006
 Cheng, D.Q. & Gu, F., Coal mine safety integrity evaluation model based on Bayesian networks. Journal of Safety and Environment, 11(4), pp. 230–233, 2011.
 Ji, P.P. & Li, X.C., Safety integrity system construction of coal mining enterprises employees. Coal Mine Safety, 10, pp. 122–124, 2010.
 Cheng, G.Y., Weng, Y.F., Lu, Y.F. & Zhang, X.C., Discussion on enterprise safety production and integrity system. Proceedings of 2010 (Shenyang) International Colloquium on Safety Science and Technology, pp. 13–16, 2010.
 Worlds’ Civil Aviation Accident Investigation, Civil Aviation Administration of China, Office of Aviation Safety, 2017, available at: http://safety.caac.gov.cn (Accessed 15 March 2017)
 Lewin, K., A dynamic theory of personality: selected papers. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 84(5), pp. 612–613, 1936. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-193611000-00051
 Sims, R.R. & Brinkman J., Leaders as moral role models: the case of John Gutfreund at Salomon brothers. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), pp. 327–339, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013826126058
 Trevino, L.K., Brown, M. & Laura, P., A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), pp. 5–37, 2003.
 White, D.W. & Lean, E., The impact of perceived leader integrity on subordinates in a work team environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), pp. 765–778, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9546-6
 Grover, S.L., Lying, deceit, and subterfuge: a model of dishonesty in the workplace. Organization Science, 4(3), pp. 478–495, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.3.478
 Ross, W.T. & Robertson, D.C., Lying: the impact of decision context. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(2), pp. 409–440, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857884
 Lewicki, R.J., Poland, T., Minton, J.W. & Sheppard, B.H., Dishonesty as deviance: a typology of workplace dishonesty and contributing factors. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 6, pp. 53–86. 1997.
 Scott, E.D., Plane truth: a qualitative study of employee dishonesty in the airline industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(4), pp. 321–337, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022579909460
 Fontela, E. & Gabus, A., DEMATEL: Progress achieved. Futures, 6(4), pp. 361–363, 1974.
 Guo, Y.J., Comprehensive Evaluation Theory and Method, Science Press: Beijing, 2002.
 Wang, X.J. & GUO Y.J., Analyzing the consistency of comparison matrix based on G1 method. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 14(3), pp. 65–68, 2006.
 Warfield, J., Binary matrices in system modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3(5), pp. 441–448, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309270
 Zhou, D.Q. & Zhang, L., Establishing hierarchy structure in complex systems based on the integration of DEMATEL and ISM. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 11(2), pp. 20–26, 2008.