Social Media During Multi-Hazard Disasters: Lessons from the Kaikoura Earthquake 2016

Social Media During Multi-Hazard Disasters: Lessons from the Kaikoura Earthquake 2016

Briony Gray Mark J. Weal David Martin 

Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, United Kingdom

Page: 
313-323
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V7-N3-313-323
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Social media provides channels of communication during emergency events such as earthquakes. Such sites may be utilised for a range of emergency response strategies providing that data is processed rapidly and management strategies employed effectively. The processing of social media data presents many challenges for emergency responders: information overload, organisational communication and information reliability remain prevalent issues. Furthermore, there is a growing need to improve the management of multi-hazard disasters (sometimes referred to as ‘cascading disasters’) due to an increase in their frequency and severity, exacerbated by underlying global problems such as climate change. This is especially important to geographical regions that are prone to particular hazards – New Zealand for instance recorded nearly 33,000 earthquakes in 2016 alone. Similarly, there is an increasing need to evaluate developments in technology and social media sites themselves as they are progressively being relied upon during emergency events. In this study, we examine the crisis communications of the Kaikoura earthquake (New Zealand, 2016) using mainstream media content such as new stories, and online content such as Twitter data. A mixed method approach was employed, which combined content analysis with the application of a conceptual framework. The paper then presents (i) an analysis of crisis communications during the event, focusing on changes in media content and theme, (ii) the structure of online emergency response in the country and its affect on management and (iii) the barriers effecting emergency response in this case study.

Keywords: 

conceptual framework, content analysis, disaster management, earthquake, emergency response, multi-hazard disaster, social media

  References

[1] Ruggiero, A. & Vos, M., Social media monitoring for crisis communication: process, methods and trends in the scientific literature. Online Journal Communication Media Technologies, 4(1), pp. 105–130, 2014.

[2] Haddow, G. & Haddow, K.S., Disaster Communications in a Changing Media World, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2012-0-06592-1

[3] Alexander, D.E., Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(3), pp. 1–17, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9502-z

[4] Carver, L. & Turoff, M., Human-computer interaction: the human and computer as a team in emergency management information systems. Communication of the ACM, 50(3), pp. 33–38, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226736.1226761

[5] Sobkowicz, P., Kaschesky, M. & Bouchard, G., Opinion mining in social media: modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), pp. 470–479, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.005

[6] Dashti, S., Palen, L., Heris, M.P., Anderson, K.M., Anderson, T.J. & Anderson, S., Supporting disaster reconnaissance with social media data: a design-oriented case study of the 2013 Colorado floods. Proceedings of the 11th International ISCRAM Conference. University Park: Pennsylvania, USA. pp. 632–641, 2014.

[7] Sweta, L.O., Early warning systems and disaster management using mobile crowdsourcing - MDIwMTMxNDI5.pdf. International Journal of Science Research, 3(4), pp. 356–365, 2014.

[8] Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., Stefanidis, A. & Radzikowski, J., #Earthquake: twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), pp. 124–147, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-671.2012.01359.x

[9] Lindsay, B., Social media and disasters: current uses, future options, and policy considerations. Congressional Research Service, 2011.

[10] Bharosa, N., Lee, J. & Janssen, M., Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: propositions from field exercises. Information System Frontiers, 12(1), pp. 49–65, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009-9174-z

[11] Lu, Y. & Yang, D., Information exchange in virtual communities under extreme disaster conditions. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), pp. 529–538, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.011

[12] Westerman, D., Spence, P.R. & Van Der Heide, B., Social media as information source: recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 19(2), pp. 171–183, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12041

[13] Shklovski, I., Palen, L. & Sutton, J. Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’08, p. 127, 2008.

[14] Wentz, B., Lazar, J., Stein, M., Gbenro, O., Holandez, E. & Ramsey, A., Danger, danger! evaluating the accessibility of Web-based emergency alert sign-ups in the northeastern United States. Goverment Information Quarterly, 31(3), pp. 488–497, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.010

[15] Fothergill, A., Maestas, E.G.M. & Darlington, J.D., Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2), pp. 156–173, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00111

[16] Laituri, M. & Kodrich, K., On line disaster response community: people as sensors of high magnitude disasters using internet GIS. Sensors, 8(5), pp. 3037–3055, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8053037

[17] Kaplan, A.M. & Haenlein, M., Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), pp. 59–68, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

[18] Tapia, A.H. & Moore, K., Good enough is good enough: overcoming disaster response organizations’ slow social media data adoption. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23(4), pp. 483–512, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9206-1

[19] Goodchild, M.F. & Glennon, J.A., Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: a research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), pp. 231–241, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538941003759255

[20] Lu, Y. & Yang, D., Information exchange in virtual communities under extreme disaster conditions. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), pp. 529–538, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.011

[21] Kappes, M.S., Papathoma-Köhle, M. & Keiler, M., Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology. Applied Geography, 32(2), pp. 577–590, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002

[22] Kousky, C., Informing climate adaptation: a review of the economic costs of natural disasters. Energy Economics, 46, pp. 576–592, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.029

[23] Lung, T., Dosio, A., Becker, W., Lavalle, C. & Bouwer, L.M., Assessing the influence of climate model uncertainty on EU-wide climate change impact indicators. Climatic Change, 120(1–2), pp. 211–227, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0825-1

[24] Hoeber, O., Hoeber, L., El Meseery, M., Odoh, K. & Gopi, R., Visual Twitter Analytics (Vista). Online Information Review, 40(1), pp. 25–41, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-02-2015-0067

[25] Gray, B., Weal, M. & Martin, D., Social media and disasters: a new conceptual framework. Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2016 Conference, 28 February 2016.

[26] Houston, J., Hawthorne, M.F., Perreault, E.H., Park, M., Goldstein Hode, M.R., Halliwell, S.E., Turner McGowen, R., Davis, S., Vaid, J.A., McElderry, S.A. & Griffith, S.A., Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters, 39(1), pp. 1–22, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092