Improving the Uptake of Flood Resilience at the Individual Property Level

Improving the Uptake of Flood Resilience at the Individual Property Level

Carly Rose Jessica Lamond Mary Dhonau Rotimi Joseph David Proverbs 

University of the West of England, UK

MDA Community Flood Consultants, UK

Cunningham Lindsey, UK

Birmingham City University, UK

Page: 
607-615
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N3-607-615
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

One of the drivers for improving resilience to flooding at property level (also known as adoption of a ‘water entry strategy’) was demonstrated by the overtopping of hard engineered flood defences across Cumbria, UK during ‘Storm Desmond’ in December 2015. Although the uptake of water exclusion strategies (also termed ‘flood resistance) is gradually improving in the UK, the longer term resilience options that permit water entry are less popular. Findings from an evidence assessment of the barriers and drivers to uptake of low-cost water entry strategy options are presented. Evidence was collected using a Rapid Evidence Assessment of published materials, semi-structured interviews and workshops with professionals, and a series of case studies of properties that had been adapted to flood risk. Factors leading to successful implementation are identified and illustrated by case study material from homes and small businesses. Water entry and water exclusion approaches were found to be seen as two methods used as part of an integrated approach that can bring about important co-benefits such as improved thermal efficiency and lower energy bills.

Keywords: 

flooding, flood-proof, flood-repairable, resilience, water entry strategy

  References

[1] Balmforth, D., Why did flood defences fail against Storm Desmond? 2015 16 December, 2015 [cited 2015; available at: http://www.ice.org.uk/media-and-policy/the-infrastructure-blog/december-2015/why-did-flood-defences-fail-against-storm-desmond.

[2] JBA Consulting, Establishing the Cost Effectiveness of Property Flood Protection: FD2657 - Final Report, Defra: London, 2013.

[3] Tagg, A., Escarameia, M. & Ortiz, J.M., Improving the flood resilience of buildings through improved materials, methods and details - Report WP6 - collation and analysis of post-flood observational data, in DCLG Building Regulations (Sanitation) Framework. 2007.

[4] Thurston, N., Finlinson, B., Breakspear, R., Williams, N., Shaw, J. & Chatterton, J., Developing the Evidence Base for Flood Resistance and Resilience - R&D Technical Report FD2607/TR, Defra: London. p. 24, 2008.

[5] Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. & Pidgeon, N.F., Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1, pp. 46–49, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059

[6] Bubeck, P., Botzen, W.J.W. & Aerts, J.C.J.H., A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Analysis, 32(9), pp. 1481–1495, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x

[7] Wassell, P., Ayton-Robinson, R., Robinson, D., Joseph, R., Hack, K., Butler, D., et al., Resilient Reinstatement – the Cost of Flood Resilient Reinstatement of Domestic Properties (ABI Research Paper no 14, 2009). In Research Paper, Association of British Insurers: London, 2009.

[8] Lamond, J.E. & Proverbs, D.G., Resilience to flooding: lessons learned from an international comparison. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Urban Design and Planning, 162(2), pp. 63–70, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63

[9] Joseph, R., Proverbs, D., Lamond, J. & Wassell, P., An analysis of the costs of resilient reinstatement of flood affected properties. Structural Survey, 29(4), pp. 279–293, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02630801111162350

[10] Defra. Low Cost Resilience – FD2682. 2015, available at: http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0& ProjectID=19221.

[11] Rose, C.B., Proverbs, D.G., Booth, C.A. & Manktelow, K.I., Three times is enemy action – flood experiences and flood perceptions. In: FRIAR III (3rd International Conference on Flood Recovery, Innovation and Response), eds. D. Proverbs, S. Mambretti, C.A. Brebbia & D. de Wrachien, WIT Press: Dubrovnik, Croatia. pp. 233–242, 2012.

[12] Steinführer, A., Local communities at risk from flooding: social vulnerability, resilience and recommendations for flood risk management in Europe, Helmholtz centre for environmental research – UFZ Leipzig, 2009.

[13] Joseph, R., Proverbs, D. & Lamond, J., Resilient reinstatement: what can we learn from the 2007 flooding in England? Flood Recovery, Innovation and Response IV, 184, p. 175, 2014.

[14] Soetanto, R., Proverbs, D.G., Lamond, J. & Samwinga, V., Residential properties in England and Wales: an evaluation of repair strategies towards attaining flood resilience. In Hazards and the Built Environment: Attaining Built-in Resilience, ed. L. Boscher, Taylor and Francis, pp. 124–149, 2008.

[15] Lamond, J., Dhonau, M., Rose, C. & Proverbs, D., Overcoming the barriers to installing property level flood protection – an overview of successful case studies. In Road Map Towards a Flood Resilient Urban Environment, Urban Flood Management Cost Action Network C22: Paris, 2009.

[16] Harries, T., Public perceptions and adaptations to flood risk. In Flood Repair Network Workshop no 4, 08/05/08, ed. D.G. Proverbs, Embassy House: Birmingham UK, 2008.