OPEN ACCESS
The consequence assessment of a major accident involving a release of toxic gas by a pipeline is usually performed through the evaluation of the associated hazard area, which is an area where the concentra-tion of the toxic substance exceeds a fixed threshold level and induces harmful effects in people and the environment; its extension represents a significant source of information required for the development of both safety and security strategies associated with dangerous pipelines. Since the threshold level adopted in the calculation strongly affects the extent of this hazard area, the purpose of this paper is to analyse such influence and the potential implications on the decisional process concerning prevention, preparedness and response actions in the case of major accidents. The paper describes the method-ological approach adopted for this purpose, as well as the main results obtained using the threshold levels most commonly applied in the industrialized countries. Although the estimate of the hazard areas involves a high level of uncertainty, this study aims at supporting the development of pipeline safety and security strategies, thus increasing the overall safety level in this vital sector.
consequence assessment, major accident, pipeline safety and security, toxic cloud dispersion
[1] Papadakis, G., Major Hazard pipelines: A comparative study of onshore transmission accidents. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 12, pp. 91–107, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-4230(98)00048-5
[2] Council Directive 96/82/CE of December 9, 1996 on the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Communities, vol. L 10, Luxembourg, pp.13-33, 1997.
[3] Council Directive 2008/114/EC on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Official Journal of the European Communities, vol. L 345, 2008.
[4] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Documentation for Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health Concentrations (IDLH). Available at http:// www.cdc.gov/niosh/idlh/idlh-1.html
[5] American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). Emergency Response Planning Guidelines (ERPGs). Available at http://www.aiha.org/content/insideaiha/ volunteer+ groups/erpcomm.htm
[6] United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs). Available at http://www.epa.gov/oppt/aegl/
[7] Centre for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of the Chemical Engineers. Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, New York, 1989.
[8] Wood, M., Pichard, A., Gundert-Remy, U., de Rooij, C. & Tissot, S.M., The AETL methodology as a potential solution to current challenges associated with the development and use of acute exposure levels in Seveso II applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, A133, pp. 84–15, 2006.
[9] Bubbico R. & Mazzarotta, B., Accidental release of toxic chemicals: Influence of the main input parameters on the consequence calculation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151, pp. 394–406, 2008.
[10] Gagliardi, R.V. & Citro, L., A sensitivity analysis on the consequences assessment in case of toxic substance released by pipelines. 5th Int. Conf. On Safety and Reliability, Versita: Warsaw, pp. 39–56, 2008.
[11] Yuhua, D., Huilin, G., Jing’en, Z. & Yaorong. F., Evaluation of gas release rate through holes in pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 151, pp. 423–428, 2002.
[12] Committee for the Prevention of disaster, TNO. Yellow Book: Methods for the calculation of physical effects due to release of hazardous materials (liquids and gases). CPR14 (Part 1), 1997.
[13] Lees, F.P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control, 3rd edn., Butterworths-Heinemann, Elsevier: Texas, USA, 2005.
[14] Prins Maurits Research Laboratory, TNO. EFFECTS a Software for Hazard Assessment, Netherlands, 1991.
[15] Davis, T.M., Dubois, J., Olcese, A., Uhlig, F., Larivè, J-F. & Martin, D.E. Performance of European Cross-country Oil Pipelines, CONCAWE, No. 4/07: Brussels, 2007.
[16] D.M. 24 November 1984: Norme di Sicurezza antincendio per il trasporto, la distribuzione, l’accumulo e l’utilizzazione del gas naturale con densità non superiore a 0,8. G.U. N°12, 1985.
[17] O’Mahony, M.T., Doolan, D., O’Sullivan, A. & Hession, M., Emergency planning and the control of major Accident hazards (COMAH/Seveso II) Directive: An Approach to determine the public safety zone for toxic cloud releases. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, pp. 355–365, 2008.