© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
Many countries have enhanced their air quality agenda (NOx, PMx etc.) by a climate change agenda (CO2 etc.). A direct way to lower these emissions is by using less energy (fuel) per activity. One of these activities is freight transport. Transport from supplier to factory relies on efficient and cost-effective means of transport. Road transport (trucking) is usually preferred. But, trucking is still very dependent on fossil fuels. It is also not suitable for bulk transport over longer distances. In areas without suitable waterways, rail is a logical alternative, but is has its own perils. This paper discusses options to make bulk freight services between Germany and France compliant with emission reduction targets. This leads to the main research question: Is it possible to design rail freight routes that reduce fuel use, emissions of CO2, NOx and PM10, while offering competitive transport times? Main rail corridors show signs of congestion and lack of resilience. It is then interesting to research if (dormant) regional/rural, non-electrified, rail tracks could provide capacity and increase resilience of rail services. Such services could also benefit rural economies. A literature study and conversations with a regional expert were used to develop a case study with a rail service using alternative routes. A model was used to estimate the fuel consumption, emissions and trip times of such services. The study indicates that it takes con- certed action to achieve the intended goals.
cross-border, economics, emissions, Europe, evaluation, Freight transport, logistics, road, rail, policy-making, simulation
[1] International Transport Forum/OECD, The Carbon Footprint of Global Trade, Tackling emissions form International Freight Transport, http://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/ files/docs/cop-pdf-06.pdf, Paris, 2015.
[2] Hesse, M. & Rodrigue, J.-P., The transport geography of logistics and freight dis- tribution, Journal of Transport Geography, 12(3), pp. 171–184, 2004. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.12.004
[3] European Commission, A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility, COM(2016) 501 final, Brussels, 20.7.2016.
[4] Bal., F. & Vleugel, J.M., Towards more environmentally sustainable intercontinental freight transport. International Journal of Transport, Development and Integration, 4(2), pp. 129–141, 2020. Vleugel, J.M., Bal, F., Regional goods delivery: How to reduce its CO2-, NOx- and PM10-emissions? International Journal of Energy Production and Management, 3(4), pp. 338–347, 2018. Janic, M., Vleugel, J.M., 2012. Estimating potential reductions in externalities from rail–road substitution in Trans-European freight transport corridors, Transportation Research. Part D: Transport & Environment, 17(2), pp. 154–160, 2012.
[5] Chapman, L., Transport and climate change: A review. Journal of Transport Geogra- phy, 15, pp. 354–367, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008
[6] Uddin, M. & Huynh, N., Reliable Routing of Road-Rail Intermodal Freight under Uncertainty. Netw Spat Econ, 19, pp. 929–952, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067- 018-9438-6
[7] Rodrigue, J.-P., The geography of transport systems, 5th ed., Routledge, New York, 2020.
[8] International Transport Forum/OECD, Transport Outlook 2019, http://doi.org/10.1787/ transp_outlook-en-2019-en, Paris. Accessed on: 11 April 2021.
[9] See reference 7.
[10] Demir, E., Huang, Y., Scholts, S. & Woensel, T. van, A selected review on the nega- tive externalities of the freight transportation: Modeling and pricing. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 77, pp. 95–114, 2015. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.02.020
[11] Pastori, E., Brambilla, M., Maffii, S., Vergnani, R., Gualandi, E. & Dani, E., Research fro TRAN Committee – Modal shift in European transport: A way forward, research for the European Parliament, http://www.europarl.Europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2018/629182/IPOL_STU(2018)629182_EN.pdf, retrieved May 2, 2021.
[12] European Court of Auditors, Rail freight transport in the EU: still nog on the right track http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ ECADocuments/SR16_08/ SR_RAIL FREIGHT EN.pdf, retrieved 18 April, 2021.
[13] European Parliament and Council, Regulation (EU) No. 1315/2013 on Union guide- lines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Deci- sion No. 661/2010/EU, 2010, retrieved 5 May, 2021.
[14] NIMBY, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIMBY, retrieved 6 May, 2021.
[15] Vleugel, J. & Bal, F., Some approaches to reduce transport time of intermodal services: Smart rail investments, European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, 52(3), pp. 1–15, 2012.
[16] An avalanche split a hill with tracks near Kestert, Germany, along the Rotterdam-Genua corridor; the busiest in Europe. It took 1,5 months to restore the tracks. Freight and pas- senger trains were rerouted, delayed or cancelled. http://www.swr.de/swraktuell/rhein- land-pfalz/koblenz/bahnl aerm-mittelrheintal-kestert-felsrutsch-100. html, retrieved 7 May, 2021.
[17] Rice, D., Global temperatures could pass limit set by Paris Climate deal within 5 years. www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2018/02/01/global-temperatures-could-pass-limit- set-paris-climate-deal-within-5-years/1087326001, 1 February, 2018, retrieved 9 May 2021.
[18] Aubin, B., Étude « Bouzonville en train » Proposée par la Ville de Bouzonville et Ber- nard AUBIN, Fédération Indépendante du Rail et des Syndicats des Transports, 1998.
[19] Rail Net Europe, http://rne.eu/rail-freight-corridors, retrieved 22 May 2021.
[20] Warscheid, L., Neue Chance für Erhalt der Niedtalbahn, Saarbrücker Zeitung, 17 April 2018.
[21] Leyes, J., Wiederaufnahme eines grenzüberschreitenden Schienenverkehres über die Niedtalbahn -Analyse der Chancen und Möglichkeiten, sowie der Kosten und Nutzen, BSc thesis Hochschule Kaiserslautern, 01-02-2021.