First Wholly-Analytical Gas Volume Fraction Model for Virtual Multiphase Flow Metering Petroleum Industry

First Wholly-Analytical Gas Volume Fraction Model for Virtual Multiphase Flow Metering Petroleum Industry

Anand S. Nagoo

Nagoo & Associates LLC, Austin, Texas, USA

Page: 
244-254
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-244-254
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

In this seminal contribution, the world’s first wholly-analytical gas volume fraction multiphase flow model is formulated and demonstrated in virtual flow meter and production allocation field applications for its differentiated ability to achieve improved reliability of phase flow rate calculations given pressure and temperature measurements at two different locations along multiphase production systems. The presented simple gas volume fraction equation is explicit in form and is validated against both lab data and oilfield flowline data. A crucial requirement for differential pressure flow meters for multiphase production systems, particularly wet gas systems in annular and annular-mist flows, is the calculation of the averaged gas volume fraction. Additional calculations include multidirectional entrainment calculations, which strongly affect the simultaneous entrainment of liquids in the gas phase and the gas in the liquid phases. historically, prior published gas volume fraction two-phase flow models had closure relations and artifi- cial adjustment (fitting) factors linked to controlled lab-scale conditions involving immiscible fluids that bear no resemblance to the complex petroleum mixtures undergoing phase change in uncontrolled long wellbore and flowline environments. Thus, ambiguous extrapolations were necessary leading to increased uncertainties. using an asymptotic approximation analysis approach, an analytical gas volume fraction equation is derived that overcomes this empirical-based restriction. In terms of comprehensive validation, the presented analytical gas volume fraction equation is demonstrated first for its ability to reliably repro- duce over 2600 two-phase annular and annular-mist flow experimental datasets inclusive of circular and non-circular conduits. Secondly, readily available published experimental data of both constant-diameter as well as variable-diameter sub-critical to critical choke two-phase flows are used for model validation in scenarios involving different flow obstructions. lastly, an offshore subsea flowline dataset is used to demonstrate the improved reliability of the new equation at field-scale operational conditions.

Keywords: 

multiphase flow metering, oil production allocation, offshore flowline and onshore pro-duction systems, volume fractions and flow rates prediction, wet gas virtual flow metering

  References

[1] Corneliussen, S., Couput, J.P., Dahl, E., Dykesteen, E., Frøysa, K. E., Malde, E. … & Tunheim, H., Handbook of multiphase flow metering, Norwegian Society for Oil and Gas Measurement (NFOGM), Revision, 2, March 2005.

[2] Falcone, G., Hewitt, G.F., Alimonti, C. & Harrison, B., Multiphase flow metering: current trends and future developments. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 54(4), 2002. https://doi.org/10.2118/74689-ms

[3] Mwalyepelo, J.Y., Analysis of Selected Multiphase Metering Concepts, M.S. Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, July 2015.

[4] Whitfield, S., Production monitoring gets smarter with virtual flow metering. Oil and Gas Facilities, May 2019.

[5] Nagoo, A.S., Analytical Modeling of Multidirectional Entrainment in Three-Phase Gas-Liquid-Liquid Flows with Oilfield Applications in High Gas Rate Wellbores and Flowlines, 10th Intl. Conf. Multiphase Flow, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 2019.

[6] Nagoo, A.S., Multiphase Analytical Prediction Engine (MAPe)—an analytical multiphase flow simulator, http://www.nagoo-associates.com, 2018.

[7] Nagoo, A.S. & Sharma, M.M., Finer theoretical aspects of the drift flux family of equations for simulating averaged volume fraction in multiphase flows. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 6(2), pp. 240–250, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v6-n2-240-250

[8] Woldesmayat, M.A. & Ghajar, A.J., Comparison of void fraction correlations for different flow patterns in horizontal and upward inclined pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 33(4), pp. 347–370, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow. 2006.09.004

[9] Cioncolini, A. & Thome, J.R., Void fraction prediction in annular two-phase flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 43, pp. 72–84, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.03.003

[10] Sujumnong, M., Heat Transfer, Pressure Drop and Void Fraction in Two-Phase, Two- Component Flow in a Vertical Tube, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manitoba, 1997.

[11] Pilehvari, A.A., Experimental Study of Subcritical Two-Phase Flow Through Wellhead Chokes, Research Report, Tulsa U. Fluid Flow Projects, September 1980.

[12] Lagiere, M., Miniscloux, C. & Roux, A., Computer two-phase flow model predicts pipeline pressure and temperature profiles, Oil and Gas Facilities, April 1984.