The effect of solar energy on the environmental profile of electricity generation in Chile: a midterm scenario

The effect of solar energy on the environmental profile of electricity generation in Chile: a midterm scenario

Mabel I. Vega Claudio A. Zaror

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Concepcion-Chile

| |
| | Citation



The Atacama Desert in Northern Chile features the highest solar radiation on continental soil worldwide, ranging within 2,500–3,400 kWh/m2/year, with UV-B radiation levels 65% above average European. This desert covers an extension over 105,000 km2 receiving more than 4,000 hours of sunshine yearly, and hosts large reserves of copper, lithium, molybdenum and other metallic and non-metallic minerals. Thus, the Chilean mining industry accounts for more than 30% of the total electricity consumption in the country. During the last 3 years major investments on solar photovoltaic (PV) plants have taken place at the Atacama Desert, driven by the drastic drop in the cost of PV technology, and incentives provided by the new Energy 2050 Roadmap set by the Chilean government, with view to fostering the introduction of renewable energy sources in the electricity market. The Chilean electricity system is composed of two connected grids, namely the Greater Northern Network (SING) and the Central Network (SIC), with a total installed capacity of nearly 21 GW. The SING network is mostly composed of thermoelectric power plants, whereas the SIC network features a significant share of hydroelectric plants, leading to different carbon footprint, namely 0.9 and 0.3 ton CO2eq/MWh, at SING and SIC, respectively. At the end of 2017, those grids were connected to meet the current 80 TWh/year national demand. Massive introduction of PV electricity generation plants at the Atacama Desert is foreseen in the near future, to reach a projected share around 25% by 2050. Within this framework, this paper presents novel results on the effect of solar energy on the environmental profile of electricity in Chile in a midterm scenario, using a life cycle assessment approach, under conditions of drastic reductions in water availability due to climate change. Results show that PV systems make a significant contribution to environmental impacts associated to electricity generation in the national mix by 2050, mainly in ozone layer depletion, abiotic depletion, global warming, acidification, and photochemical oxidation potentials impact categories, mainly from upstream transport and cell manufacturing. The extent of those impacts could increase significantly if the PV lifespan decreases due to cells degradation as a result of harsh environmental conditions, highlighting the need for reliable data on this key parameter. 


Chile, electricity generation, life cycle assessment, solar PV technologies


[1] Chilean Electricity Coordinator. Renewable energies annual report 2017, available at (accessed 03 January 2018).

[2] UNEP. Green Energy Choices: The benefits, risks and trade-offs of low-carbon technologies for electricity production. Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environmental Program, eds. E.G. Hertwich, J. Aloisi de Larderel, A. Arvesen, P. Bayer, J. Bergesen, E. Bouman, T. Gibon, G. Heath, C. Peña, P. Purohit, A. Ramirez, & S. Suh, UNEP: Paris, 2016.

[3] Bustos, C., Watts, D. & Ayala, M., Financial risk reduction in photovoltaic projects through ocean-atmospheric oscillations modeling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, pp. 548–568, 2017.

[4] Mints, P., Demand shift impacts pricing. Renewable Energy Focus, 15(4), pp. 14–15, 2014.

[5] Pillai, U., Drivers of cost reduction in solar photovoltaics, Energy Economics, 50, pp. 286–293, 2015.

[6] Roadmap 2050, Advisory Committee-Energy 2050. Chilean Ministry of Energy, available at, September 2015.

[7] Moreno-Leiva, S., Díaz-Ferrán, G., Haas, J., Telsnig, T., Díaz-Alvarado, F. A., PalmaBehnke, R. & Eltrop, L., Towards solar power supply for copper production in Chile: assessment of global warming potential using a life-cycle approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, pp. 242–249, 2017.

[8] De Simon-Martin, M., Diez-Mediavilla, M. & Alonso-Tristan, C., Real energy payback time and carbon footprint of a GCPVS. Aims Energy, 5(1), pp. 77–95, 2017.

[9] Stoppato, A., Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation. Energy,33(2), pp. 224–232, 2008.

[10] Tsang, M. P., Sonnemann, G. &, Bassani, D., A comparative human health, ecotoxicity, and product environmental assessment on the production of organic and silicon solar cells. Progress in Photovoltaics, 24, pp. 645–655, 2015.

[11] De Wild-Scholten, M.J., Energy payback time and carbon footprint of commercial photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 119, pp. 296–305, 2013.

[12] Amponsah, N.Y., Troldborg, M., Kington, B., Aalders, I. & Hough, R.L., Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: a review of lifecycle considerations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, pp. 461–475, 2014.

[13] Bergesen, J.D., Heath, G.A., Gibon, T. & Suh, S., Thin-film photovoltaic power generation offers decreasing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing environmental co- benefits in the long term. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(16), pp. 9834–9843, 2014.

[14] Berrill, P., Arvesen, A., Scholz, Y., Gils, H.C., & Hertwich, E.G., Environmental impacts of high penetration renewable energy scenarios for Europe. Environmental Research Letters, 11(1), p. 14012, 2016.

[15] Masanet, E., Chang, Y., Gopal, A.R., Larsen, P., Morrow III, W.R., Sathre, R. & Zhai, P., Life-cycle assessment of electric power systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38(38), pp. 107–136, 2013.

[16] Gerbinet, S., Belboom, S. & Léonard, A., Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of photovoltaic panels: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, pp. 747–753, 2014.

[17] Bhandari, K.P., Collier, J.M., Ellingson, R.J. & Apul, D.S., Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, pp. 133–141, 2015.

[18] ISO 14.040:2006, Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework – International Standard ISO 14.040, 2006.

[19] ISO 14.044: 2006, Environmental Management- Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and guidelines. International Standard ISO 14.044, 2006.

[20] Guinée, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., Sleeswijk, A.W., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., de Bruijn, H., van Duin, R. & Huijbregts, M.A.J., Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002.

[21] PRé Consultants. SimaPro 7.3.3. Pré Consultants, Amersfoort, the Netherlands, available at, 2009.

[22] Ecoinvent 3.4, Ecoinvent, available at, 2017.

[23] Vega, M. & Zaror, C.A., Life cycle Inventory of electricity generation and distribution in Chile. Universidad de Concepción, Chile. Copyright N 241.457, 2011.

[24] Life Cycle Inventory of Electricity Generation in Chile. Presented at the International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment, CILCA, Coatzacoalcos, México, 2011.

[25] Xakalashe, B.S., Norway, T. & Tangstad, M., Silicon processing: from quartz to crystalline silicon solar cells. Southern African Pyrometallurgy, eds. R.T. Jones, & P. Den Hoed, Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Johannesburg, 2011.