OPEN ACCESS
Molten-salt reactors (MSRs) can provide inexpensive industrial process heating in addition to generating electricity. In most cases, this can be best accomplished by design simplification, which results in improvements to MSR’s already existing and inherently strong safety characteristics. This is just one of a number of possible future scenarios that will influence the way in which MSR technology can develop and become marketable. The emphasis in this paper is to develop a reactor with application to the widest possible range of industries. This paper concentrates on the need to develop the inherent safety characteristics of the single fluid thermal reactor with the expectation that sufficient reliability and safety will be achieved in design so that these power generators will eventually be accepted for close integration into the fabric of modern society. It seems inevitable that the required licensing procedures needed for MSRs will vary considerably depending on their type because different designs vary so much. Those used for low-temperature process heat in addition to power generation require much less demanding regulatory procedures than those operating at higher temperatures. This is largely because long-term corrosion is more problematic at higher temperatures and present-day construction materials limit the development of MSRs from reaching their full potential. With appropriate experience with operating early designs of MSRs it is reasonable to expect that lower temperature versions will become certifiable for use in close proximity to a large range of human activities. Ultimately these reactors will be controllable remotely without the local attendance of technical staff.
molten-salt reactor, nuclear reactor control, nuclear technology, process heating
[1] Kamei, T., Recent research of thorium molten-salt reactor from a sutainability view- point. Sustainability, 4(10), pp. 2399–2418, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su4102399
[2] Hargraves, R. & Moir, M., Liquid fluoride thorium reactors. American Scientist, 98, pp. 304–313, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1511/2010.85.304
[3] Energy Process Developments, MRS review:feasibility of developing a pilot scale molten salt reactor in the U.K, available at www.EnergyProcessDevelopment.com pp. 1–74, 2015.
[4] Ho, M.K.M., Yeoh, G.H. & Bracudakis, G., Molten salt reactors. Materials and Pro- cesses for Energy, Formatex, ed. A. Mendes-Vilas, pp. 761–768, 2013.
[5] Touran, N., Molten salt reactors, available at http://whatisnuclear.com/msr.html
[6] Lerner, G., available at http://liquidfluoridethoriumreactor.glerner.com/2012-down- sides-of-lftrs/
[7] Anon, Thorium MSR: Pros and Cons, Nucleargreen blogspot, available at http:// thoriummsr.com/intro/pros-and-cons-list/
[8] World Nuclear Association, available at http://www.world-nuclear.org/Information-Library
[9] Herbst, A.M. & Hopley, G.W., Nuclear Energy Now: Why the Time has Come for the World’s Most Misunderstood Energy Resource, John Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, pp. 1–230, 2007.
[10] Boothroyd, R.G., A suggested roadmap for world-wide energy resource planning and management. International Journal of Energy Production & Management, 1(1), pp. 72–86, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/EQ-V1-N1-72-86
[11] Forsberg, C.W., Thermal- and fast-Spectrum Molten Salt reactors for Actinide Burning and Fuel Production, Global 07: Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Systems, American Nuclear Society, manuscript number 175768, Boise, Idaho, September 9-13, 2007.
[12] LeBlanc, D., Too good to leave on the shelf. Mechanical Engineering, 132(5), pp. 28–33, 2010.
[13] Ignatiev, V.V., Feynberg, O.S., Zagnitko, A.V., Merzlyakov, A.V., Surenkov, A.L., Panov, A.V., Subbotin, V.G., Afonichkin, V.K., Khokhlov, V.A. & Kormilitsyn, M.V., Molten salt reactors:new possibilities,problems and solutions. Atomic Energy, 112(3), pp, 157–165, 2012.
[14] Soelberg, N.R., Garn, T.G., Greenhalgh, M.R., Law, J.D., Jubin, R., Strachan, D.M. & Thallapally, P.K., Radioactive iodine and krypton control for nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, Article ID 702496, p. 12, available at http://dx.doi.org/1155/2013/702496, 2013.
[15] Keepin, G.R., Wimett, T.F. & Zeigler, R.K., Delayed neutrons from fissionable isotopes of uranium, plutonium and thorium. Physical Review, 107, p. 1044, 1957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.107.1044
[16] Elshiekh, B.M., Safety assessment of molten salt reactors in comparison with light water reactors. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 6, pp. 63–70, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2013.10.008
[17] Anon., No glow-just wash and dry: a white paper (free subscription required for access), available at powertechnology.com 15 November 2015.
[18] Boothroyd, R.G., Urban planning for emergent technologies, new life-styles and a changing environment. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 179, pp. 93–107, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/SC130081
[19] Boothroyd, R.G., A proposed extra international air corridor along the world’s equa- torial belt, paper 1067. General Proceedings, 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, 2010.
[20] Pearce, F., New delays hit Sellafield clean up. NewScientist, 225(3005), pp. 8–9, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(15)60145-2