The Global Energy Challenge: Still Fuel for Progress?

The Global Energy Challenge: Still Fuel for Progress?

Erik Jarlsby 

Erik Jarlsby AS, Norway

| |
| | Citation



This paper summarises the key challenges for the global energy sector to fulfil its essential role in the world with a forward perspective from 2014 to 2040. The paper draws on scenarios and other analyses developed by leading institutions and firms. The global availability of extractive energy resources is not likely constrain global progress on human development in the chosen time perspective, but the supplies of oil and gas can come under strain and produce price shocks from time to time resulting from events affecting the supply system. A more severe challenge arises from the impacts of energy-related emissions on the global climate. Actions are possible on the arenas of technology development, enterprise and political governance, which will significantly reduce such risks while fulfilling the energy sector’s contribution to improve human conditions. Six such issues of technology development are highlighted, and two issues of political governance: appropriate pricing of energy and emissions, and development of energy efficient cities.


climate change, energy policy, oil resources, sustainability


[1] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report, available at, 2013.

[2] Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis, Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change, available at, 2013.

[3] Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC), Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, Summary for policymakers, available at, 2012.

[4] BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, available at, 2013.

[5] Shell, New Lens Scenarios, available at, 2013.

[6] United States Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Outlook 2013, available at, 2013.

[7] ExxonMobil, The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040, available at www.exxonmobil. com, 2014.

[8] International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/weo-2013-en

[9] IHS, CERA Upstream Capital Cost Index, available at

[10] Al-Kasim, F., Managing Petroleum Resources. The “Norwegian Model” in a Broad Perspective. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2006.

[11] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Thorium’s Potential in Nuclear Power Development, available at, 2011.

[12] European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), Wind in power; 2013 European statistics, available at, 2014.

[13] Nagl, S., Fursch, M. & Lindenberger, D., The costs of electricity systems with a high share of fluctuating renewables: a stochastic investment and dispatch optimization model for Europe. The Energy Journal, 34(4), pp. 151–179, 2013. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.5547/01956574.34.4.8

[14] United States Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), Revolution now: the future arrives for four clean energy technologies, available at, 2013.

[15] International Monetary Fund (IMF), IMF Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications, available at, 2013.

[16] Sumner, J, Bird, L. & Smith, H., Carbon taxes: a review of experience and policy design considerations. Technical Report December 2009, National Renewable Energy Labora- tory, available at, 2013.

[17] Newman, P. & Kenworthy, J., Sustainability and cities: Overcoming Automobile Depen- dence, Island Press: 1999. doi:

[18] Mercer, Quality of Living Rankings Report, available at, 2012.

[19] Københavns Kommune (City of Copenhagen), KBH 2025 Klimaplanen (in Danish language), available at, 2012.

[20] World Bank database, available at

[21] Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL), Carbon Cycle Gases Mauna Loa, Hawaii, United States Time Series, available at, 2014.