OPEN ACCESS
The relationship between the energy efficiency, energy density and complexity level of the system is here addressed from both thermodynamic and evolutionary perspectives. A case study from economic systems is presented to show that, contrary to widespread opinion, energy efficiency is responsible for energy growth and the complexity leap. This article further examines to what extent complexity, on a historical time scale, may evolve to counterbalance conservative effects brought about by energy efficiency. We analyze structural complexity growth by four different paradigms. An evolutionary pattern is then proposed that may encompass the broad dynamics underlying complexity growth. This evolutionary pattern rests on the hypothesis that thermodynamic evolutionary systems are featured from an ever growing influx of energy driven into the system by self-catalytic processes, which must find its way through the constrains of the system. The system initially disposes of the energy by expanding, in extent and in number of components, up to saturation due to inner or outer constraints. The two counteractive forces, constraints and growing energy flux, expose the systems to new gradients. Every new gradient upon the system represents a symmetry rupture in components’ space. By exploring a new gradient, the system imposes further restrictions on its components and increases its overall degree of freedom.
complexity, complexity leap, degree of freedom, energy density, energy efficiency, fordian structure, spatial gradients, whole structure
[1] Binswanger, M., Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, 36, pp. 119–132, 2001.
[2] Geening, L.A., Greene, D.L. & Difi glio, C., Energy effi ciency and consumption – the rebound effect – a survey. Energy Policy, 28(6/7), pp. 389–401, 2000.
[3] Blake, A., Jevons’ paradox. Surveys. Ecological Economics, 54, pp. 9–21, 2005.
[4] Khazzoom, J.D., Economic implications of mandated effi ciency in standards for household appliances. The Energy Journal, 1(4), pp. 21–40, 1980.
[5] Jevons, W.S., The Coal Question – An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines, Augustus M. Kelley: New York, 1965.
[6] Odum, E.P., Ecology: A Bridge between Science and Society, Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, 1997.
[7] Fath, B., Patten, B. & Choi, J., Complementary of ecological goal functions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, pp. 493–506, 2001.
[8] Lotka, A., Elements of Mathematical Biology, Dover Publications, Inc.: New York, 1956 (fi rst publication: Elements of Physical Biology, Williams and Wilkins Co., Inc., 1924).
[9] Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. & Watson, J.D., Molecular Biology of the Cell, Garland Publishing, Inc.: New York, 1994.
[10] Chaisson, E., Cosmic Evolution – The Rise of Complexity in Nature, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 2001.
[11] Lipietz, A., Towards a New Economic Order, Posfordism, Ecology and Democracy, Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992.
[12] Tuttotrasporti, Editoriale Domus S.p.A., Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
[13] Krugman, P., Cooper, R.N. & Srinivasan, T.N., Growing world trade: causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 25th Anniversary Issue, pp. 327–377, 1995.
[14] OECD, Economic regionalisation and intra-industry trade: Pacifi c-Asian perspectives, OECD Development Centre, Working Paper No. 53, 1992.
[15] OECD, Intra-industry and intra-fi rm trade and the internationalisation of production, OECD, Economic Outlook 71, Part VI, Paris, 2002.
[16] OECD, Liberalisation and structural Reform in the freight transport sector in europe, OECD, Paris, 1997.
[17] Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I., Order Out of Chaos, New Science Library: Boulder, CO, 1984.
[18] El-Samad, H., Prajna, S., Papachristodoulou, A., Doyle, J. & Khammash, M., Advanced methods and algorithms for biological networks analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(4), pp. 832–853, 2006. Postprint available free at: http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/1474.
[19] Johnson, L., Thermodynamic origin of ecosystems. Entropy, Information, and Evolution, eds B.H. Weber, D.J. Depew & J.D. Smith, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1988.
[20] Schneider, E.D. & Kay, J.J., Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics. Math. Comp. Model, 19(6–8), pp. 25–48, 1994.
[21] Loehle, C., Challenges of ecological complexity. Ecological Complexity, 1, pp. 3–6, 2004.
[22] Swenson, R., Autokatakinetics, evolution, and the law of maximum entropy production: a principled foundation toward the study of human ecology. Advances in Human Ecology, ed. L. Freese, JAI Press: Greewich, CT, pp. 1–47, 1989.
[23] Swenson, R., Emergent attractors and the law of maximum entropy production: foundations to a theory of general evolution. Systems Research, 6, 187–197, 1989.
[24] Allen, T.H.F. & Starr, T.B., Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 1982.