OPEN ACCESS
Nowadays, a variety of numerical methods and numerical formulations exits to solve complex or coupled field problems in three dimensions. Most of them are generally applicable to nearly arbitrary kind of field problems. On the other hand, some highly optimized methods are available, which are predestined for the solution of a specific kind of problem. Especially in the case of weakly coupled multiphysics problems, a mixture of several numerical methods is very advantages to benefit from different properties of numerical methods for diverse physical sub-problems. A very promising approach for a flexible coordination of the related solution process is the application of software agents. Then, the results of one sub-problem are converted into boundary values or volume source distributions for another sub-problem and software agents choose solution methods independently for each sub-problem. Furthermore, two main aspects have to be considered in applications of numerical methods. First, the solution of a boundary value problem should be computed efficiently and second, the solution is evaluated for visualization and interpretation of obtained results. In practice, it is difficult to choose a single appropriate method, which is well suited both for the solution of a problem and its evaluation, since the demands differ in both cases. Here, a concept is presented to apply various numerical methods successfully to the solution and evaluation of complex field problems. Attention is mainly turned on the integration of boundary element methods into the concept of mixed numerical formulations.
boundary element methods, coupled problems, finite element methods, post-processing, software agent systems, visualization
[1] Brebbia, C.A., Telles, J.C.F. & Wrobel, L.C., (eds.), Boundary Element Techniques, Springer-Verlag: Berlin and New York, 1984.
[2] Buchau, A., Application of Fast Boundary Element Methods in Engineering and Science. Proceedings of ICCES 2017 International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Science, Funchal, 2017.
[3] Buchau, A. & Rucker, W.M., Feasibility of a meshfree post-processing for boundary element methods. Boundary Elements and Other Mesh Reduction Methods XXXVIII, pp. 327–338, 2015.https://doi.org/10.2495/bem380261
[4] Greengard, L. & Rokhlin, V., A New Version of the Fast Multipole Method for the Laplace Equation in Three Dimensions. Acta Numerica, pp. 229–269, 1997.
[5] Buchau, A., Rieger, W. & Rucker, W.M., Fast field computations with the fast multipole method. COMPEL, 20(2), pp. 547–561, 2001.https://doi.org/10.1108/03321640110383861
[6] Bebendorf, M., Approximation of boundary element matrices. Numerische Mathematik, 86(4), pp. 565–589, 2000.https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00005410
[7] Buchau, A., Rucker, W.M., Rain, O., Rischmüller, V., Kurz, S. & Rjasanow, S., Com-parison between different approaches for fast and efficient 3D BEM computations. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 39(3), pp. 1107–1110, 2003.https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2003.810167
[8] Axelsson, O., Iterative Solution Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996
[9] Buchau, A. & Rucker, W.M., Meshfree computation of field lines across multiple domains using fast boundary element methods. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 51(3), pp. 1–4, 2015.https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2014.2359520
[10] Wilhelms, J. & van Gelder, A., Octrees for faster isosurface generation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 11(3), pp. 201–227, 1992.https://doi.org/10.1145/130881.130882
[11] Buchau, A. & Rucker, W.M., A meshfree isosurface computation method for boundary element methods. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, 5(5), pp. 647–658, 2017.
[12] Fehlberg, E., Klassische Runge-Kutta-Formeln fünfter und siebenter Ordnung mit Schrittweiten-Kontrolle. Computing, 4(2), pp. 93–106, 1969.https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02234758
[13] Jüttner, M., Buchau, A., Rauscher, M., Rucker, W.M. & Göhner, P., Software Agent Based Domain Decomposition Method, 15th International IGTE Symposium, Graz, Austria, pp. 89–94, 2012.
[14] Jüttner, M., Buchau, A., Vögeli, D., Rucker, W.M. & Göhner, P., Iterative Software Agent Based Solution of Multiphysics Problems, Scientific Computing in Electrical Engineering, Springer, pp. 123–131, 2016.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30399-4_13
[15] Jüttner, M., Grabmaier, S., Vögeli, D., Rucker, W.M. & Göhner, P., Coupled multiphysics problems as market place for competing autonomous software agents. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 53(6), pp. 1–4, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2017.2659228