© 2020 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
Nowadays, a considerable percentage of trains mature delays due to nodes and stations congestion. They are normally a combination of effects of routes conflicts in stations on lines and propagation in stations of delays suffered along the lines. It is a consequence of the variable values of capacity within the railway system caused by a combination of parameters, more relevant when short line sections separate nearby stations. Goal of the research is to compare some literature methods for the assessment of nodes and lines capacity to identify their reciprocal effects and innovative approaches. The work is included in a research framework with the final goal of traffic optimization and minimization of delays. In order to tackle the purpose, the paper introduces synthetically the methods and applies them systematically to a complex text network, including single and double track lines and various typologies of stations. The results of the methods applications are compared each other and with the outputs of a simulation approach. This analysis highlights the most appropriate application fields of single methods and the need of their integration and combination in terms of inputs, intermediate and final results. The review of single and coordinated use of these methods will move towards the definition of a comprehensive new methodological approach for combined lines-nodes capacity calculation. It will represent a powerful instrument to facilitate decision making on operational and infrastructural improvements of complex railway networks.
capacity, circulation optimization, conflict, delays minimization, lines, stations
[1] Lüthi, M., Medeossi, G. & Nash A., Evaluation of an integrated real-time rescheduling and train control system for heavily used areas. RailHannover – International Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis. Hannover, Germany, 2007.
[2] Kontaxi E., Ricci S. (2012). Railway capacity handbook: a systematic approach to methodologies. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 2012.
[3] Kontaxi E., Ricci S. (2009). Techniques and methodologies for carrying capacity evaluation: comparative analysis and integration perspectives. Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 64(12), 2009.
[4] Kontaxi E., Ricci S. (2011). Calculation of railway network capacity: comparing methodologies for lines and nodes. RailRome – International Seminar on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis. Rome, Italy, 2011.
[5] Kontaxi E., Ricci, S. (2010). Railway capacity analysis: methodological framework and harmonization perspectives. WCTR – World Conference on Transportation Research. Lisboa, Portugal, 2010.
[6] Landex A. (2011). Capacity at railway stations. World Congress on Railway Research WCRR 2011. Lille, France.
[7] Dicembre A., Ricci S. (2011). Railway traffic on high density urban corridors: capacity, signalling and timetable. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 1(2).
[8] Heydar M., Petering M.E., Bergmann D.R. (2013). Mixed integer programming for minimizing the period of a cyclic railway timetable for a single track with two train types. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(1).
[9] Goverde R M., Corman F., D’Ariano A. (2013). Railway line capacity consumption of different railway signalling systems under scheduled and disturbed conditions. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 3(3).
[10] Malavasi G., Molková T., Ricci S., Rotoli, F. (2014). A synthetic approach to the evaluation of the carrying capacity of complex railway nodes. Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 4(1–2).
[11] Zhang J. (2015). Analysis on-line capacity usage for China high speed railway with optimization approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77.
[12] Zhang X., Nie L. (2016). Integrating capacity analysis with high-speed railway timetabling: a minimum cycle time calculation model with flexible overtaking constraints and intelligent enumeration. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 68.
[13] Lai Y. C., Ip C. S. (2017). An integrated framework for assessing service efficiency and stability of rail transit systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 79.
[14] Jamili A. (2018). Computation of practical capacity in single-track railway lines based on computing the minimum buffer times. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 8(2), 91–102.
[14] Yan, F., & Goverde, R. M. (2019). Combined line planning and train timetabling for strongly heterogeneous railway lines with direct connections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 127.
[15] Wang R., Nie L., Tan Y. (2020). Evaluating Line Capacity with an Analytical UIC Code 406 Compression Method and Blocking Time Stairway. Energies, 13(7), 1853.
[16] Armstrong J., Preston J. (2017). Capacity utilisation and performance at railway stations. Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 7(3).
[17] Potthoff G. (1965). Verkehrsströmungslehre. Transveb, Berlin, Germany, 1965.
[18] Rotoli F., Malavasi G., Ricci S. (2016). Complex railway systems: capacity and utilisation of interconnected networks. European Transport Research Review, 8(4).
[19] Malavasi G., Rotoli, F. (2008). Carrying capacity of complex railway nodes. AATT 2008 – International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, Athens, Greece.
[20] UIC – International Union of Railways (2004). Leaflet 406, Capacity. Paris, France, 2004.
[21] Wahlborg M. (2004). Banverket experience of capacity calculations according to the UIC capacity leaflet. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 74, 2004.
[22] Prinz R., Höllmüller J. (2005). Implementation of the UIC 406 capacity calculation method at Austrian railways (ÖBB). WCRR 2006 – World Conference on Railway Research. Montreal, Canada.
[23] Landex A., Kaas A.H., Schittenhelm B., Schneider-Tilli, J. (2006). Evaluation of railway capacity. Trafficdays, Aalborg, Denmark, 2006.
[24] Hansen S., Landex A., Kaas A. H. (2006). The network effects of railway investments. International conference WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 74, 2006.
[25] Linder T. (2011). Applicability of the analytical UIC Code 406 compression method for evaluating line and station capacity. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 1(1), 2011.