Noise Reduction for Ballasted Track: A Comparative Socio-Economic Assessment

Noise Reduction for Ballasted Track: A Comparative Socio-Economic Assessment

John Armstrong Alejandro Ortega Simon Blainey John Preston David Thompson Giacomo Squicciarini Evangelos Ntotsios

Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton, UK

Institution of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, UK

Available online: 
| Citation



Transport infrastructure produces many externalities. Increased accessibility and the resultant economic development are among the most notable positive ones. Accidents, air and noise pollution and other environmental issues, such as impacts on biodiversity, landscape and townscape, are the most important negative ones. In the case of railway infrastructure, noise impacts have a key effect on net social benefit. Noise reduction is crucial to achieve greater social benefits. Against this background, the University of Southampton has been undertaking the Track to the Future (T2F) project, which is assessing, among other issues, how to produce a quiet ballasted track system that at the same time is cheaper to maintain and renew.

This paper considers combinations of engineering interventions that could reduce rail-related noise, including under sleeper pads, rail dampers and noise barriers which all reduce noise emissions. It extends previous analysis of under sleeper pads to compare their costs and benefits with those of rail dampers and noise barriers in the context of a UK-based installation case study.


comfort, cost–benefit analysis, noise, noise barriers, rail dampers, railway, under sleeper pads, upgrades


[1] Frost, M.W., Ison, S.G. & Watson, R., UK rail transport: A review of demand and supply. Proceedings of the ICE – Transport, 165(3), pp. 225–234, 2012, https://doi. org/10.1680/tran.10.00028.

[2] Powrie, W., On track: The future for rail infrastructure systems. Proceedings of the  Institution of Civil Engineers – Civil Engineering, 167(4), pp. 177–185, 2014,

[3] Ortega, A., Vassallo, J., Guzmán, A. & Pérez-Martínez, P., Are longer and heavier vehicles (LHVs) beneficial for society? A cost benefit analysis to evaluate their potential implementation in Spain. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary  Journal, 34(2), pp. 150–168, 2014,

[4] Salling, K. & Nielsen, O., Uncertainties in transport project evaluation: Editorial.  European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15(3), pp. 282–285, 2015,

[5] Asplund, D. & Eliasson, J., Does uncertainty make cost-benefit analyses pointless?Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, pp. 195–205, 2016,

[6] Track to the Future (T2F), available at (accessed 14 November 2018).

[7] Schilder, R., USP (under sleeper pads): A contribution to save money in track maintenance. AusRAIL PLUS, Driving the Costs Out of Rail, 2013.

[8] Ortega, A., Blainey, S. & Preston, J., Installation of under sleeper pads on ballasted railway track: An economic analysis of their potential implementation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(6), pp. 1800–1813, 2017,

[9] Ortega, A., Blainey, S., Preston, J., Thompson, D., Squicciarini, G., Ntotsios, E. & Armstrong, J., Noise reduction for ballasted track: A socio-economic assessment. Ashurst: WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 181. WIT Press, 2018, ISSN 1743-3509.t.

[10] Andersson, A. & Ogren, M., Noise charges in railway infrastructure: A pricing schedule based on the marginal cost principle. Transport Policy, 14, pp. 204–213, 2007,

[11] De Coensel, B., Botteldooren, D., Berglund, B., Nilsson, M.E., De Muer, T. & Lercher, P., Experimental investigation of noise annoyance caused by high-speed trains. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 93(4), pp. 589–601, 2007, 1854/10361.

[12] Bickel, P., Friedrich, R., Link, H., Stewart, L. & Nash, C., Introducing environmental externalities into transport pricing: Measurement and implications. Transport  Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 26(4), pp. 389–415, 2006, https://doi. org/10.1080/01441640600602039.

[13] Staatsen, B., Nijland, H.A., van Kempem E.M.M., de Hollander A.E.M., Franssen, A.E.M. & van Kamp, I., Assessment of health impacts and policy options in relation to transport-related noise exposures, RIVM Report, Bilthoven: RIVM (Netherlands  National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), 2004.

[14] Brons, M., Nijkamp, P., Pels, E. & Rietveld, P., Railroad noise: Economic valuation and policy. Transportation Research D, 8, pp. 169–184, 2003,

[15] Nash, C., Unification of Accounts and Marginal Costs for Transport Efficiency: Final Report, ITS, University of Leeds, available at (accessed 19 March 2018).

[16]  Strand, J. & Vagnes, M., The relationship between property values and railroad proximity: A study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers’ appraisals. Transportation, 28, pp. 137–156, 2001,

[17] Bristow, A., Wardman, M. & Chintakayala, V., International meta-analysis of stated preference studies of transportation noise nuisance. Transportation, 42, pp. 71–100, 2015,

[18] Navrud, S., Trædal, Y., Hunt, A., Longo, A., Greßmann, A., Leon, C. & Meszaros, F., Economic values for key impacts valued in the stated preference surveys, developing harmonised European approaches for transport costing and project assessment (HEATCO), available at (accessed 19 March 2018).

[19] Nijland, H., van Kempen, E., van Wee, G. & Jabben, J., Costs and benefits of noise abatement measures. Transport Policy, 10, pp. 131–140, 2003,

[20] WebTAG: TAG data book. December 2017, Department for transport, available at (accessed 19 March 2018).

[21] Weinberger, M., Thomassen, H. & Willeke, R., Kosten des Larms in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Erich Schmidt Verlag: Berlin, 1991.

[22] Oertli, J. & Wassmer, D., Rail noise control in Switzerland: Legislation, environment, politics and finances. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 193, pp. 403–406, 1996,

[23] Tyssen, L., Consequenties van Voorgenomen Woningbouwplannen van het Aanhouden van Grenswaarden met betrekking tot Spoorweglawaai, Transportation, 28, pp. 137–156, 1982.

[24] Howarth, A., Pearce, D.W., Ozdemiroglu, E., Seccombe-Hett, T., Wieringa, K., Streefkerk, C.M. & Hollander, A.E.M., Valuing the benefits of environmental policy: the Netherlands. RIVM Report, 2001.

[25] van Kempen, E., Een schatting van de baten van geluidmaatregelen. RIVM Report, 2001.

[26] Surface Transport Costs and Charges Great Britain 1998, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, available at (accessed 19 March 2018).

[27] The Valuation of Transport-Related Noise in Birmingham,. University of East Anglia, available at (accessed 19 March 2018).

[28] Nellthorp, J., Bristow, A.L. & Day, B., Introducing willingness‐to‐pay for noise changes into transport appraisal: An application of benefit transfer. Transport Reviews: A  Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 27(3), pp. 327–353, 2007, https://doi. org/10.1080/01441640601062621.

[29] Theebe, M.A., Planes, trains and automobiles: The impact of traffic noise on house prices. Journal of Real Estate, Finance and Economics, 28(2/3), pp. 209–234, 2004,

[30] Bristow, A., Wardman, M. & Chintakayala, V., International meta-analysis of stated preference studies of transportation noise nuisance. Transportation, 42, pp. 71–100, 2015,

[31] Ögren, M., Swärdh, J.-E., Andersson, H. & Jonsson, L., Noise charges for Swedish railways based on marginal cost calculations, available at, 2011 (accessed 19 March 2018).

[32] Grujičić, D., Ivanović, I., Jović, J. & Đorić, V., Customer perception of service quality in public. Transport, 29(3), pp. 285–295, 2014, 1685.

[33] Hardy, A., Measurement and assessment of noise within passengers trains. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 231(3), pp. 819–829, 2000,

[34] Kouroussis, G., Connolly, D. & Verlinden, O., Railway-induced ground vibrations – A review of vehicle effects. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2(2), pp. 69–110, 2014,

[35] Huang, Y. & Griffin, M., The discomfort produced by noise and whole-body vertical vibration presented separately and in combination. Ergonomics, 57(11), pp. 1724–1738, 2014,

[36] Howarth, H.V.C. & Griffin, M.J., The relative importance of noise and vibration from railways. Applied Ergonomics, 21(2), pp. 129–34, 1990,

[37] Sundström, J. & Shafiquzzaman, K., Influence of stationary lateral vibrations on train passengers’ difficulty to read and write. Applied Ergonomics, 39(6), pp. 710–718, 2008,

[38] Castellanos, J.C. & Fruett, F., Embedded system to evaluate the passenger comfort in public transportation based on dynamical vehicle behavior with user’s feedback. Measurement, 47, pp. 442–451, 2014,

[39] Oborne, D.J., Vibration and passenger comfort: Can data from subjects be used to predict passenger comfort? Applied Ergonomics, 9(3), pp. 155–61, 1978, https://doi. org/10.1016/0003-6870(78)90006-6.

[40] Karakasis, K., Skarlatos, D. & Zakinthinos, T., A factorial analysis for the determination of an optimal train speed with a desired ride comfort. Applied Acoustics, 66(10), pp. 1121–1134, 2005,

[41] Triepaischajonsak, N., The effect of sleeper soffit pads on railway noise. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc, University of Southampton, UK, 2008.

[42] European Parliament: Directorate General for Internal Policies. Reducing Railway Noise Pollution, available at, 2012 (accessed 9 November 2018).

[43] Real cost of railway noise mitigation; UIC, available at, (accessed 19 March 2018).