OPEN ACCESS
The project brief was simple: create future proof guidelines for a form of transport that has rarely been seen and technology capabilities that have only recently been imagined while ensuring safety and ease of use for government and industry. Automated vehicles are predicted to revolutionize mobility in a way that we have not seen for over a hundred years. Increased safety on the road, improved efficiency and beneficial environmental impacts are all presented as potential benefits of more automated vehicles. However, to achieve these outcomes the technology must be trialled and tested in many different environments. In Australia, establishing that the technology can perform is crucial to both the public as users and to governments, who aim to ensure public safety. For example, it is necessary to confirm that the red dust in Central Australia doesn’t inhibit cameras and that movement projection algorithms can accurately predict the course of a kangaroo. Additionally, any guidance must work within the existing transport regulatory framework. The federated states and territories of Australia manage operational aspects of road transport regulation, while the Commonwealth Government manages standards for imported vehicles or those manufactured in Australia. This article describes the policy context in which the National Transport Commission worked with the state, territory and federal governments as well as industry stakeholders to design a flexible but robust set of guidelines that both encourages trials in Australia and ensures the safety of other road users.
Australia, automated vehicles, data, insurance, intelligent transport systems, transport, trials
[1] European Council, Declaration of Amsterdam: Cooperation in the Field of Connected and Automated Driving. European Council: Amsterdam, 2016.
[2] US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Federal Automated Vehicles Policy: Accelerating the Next Revolution in Roadway Safety, available at https://www.transportation.gov/AV/federal-automated-vehiclespolicy-september-2016, September 2016 (accessed 11 November 2016).
[3] Arnold, A., Tim Fischer on the Ghan: From Adelaide to Alice Springs with a train devotee. The Monthly, March 2014.
[4] Rosen, A., The Australian experience of deinstitutionalization: Interaction of Australian culture with the development and reform of its mental health services. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum, 113(429), pp. 81–89, 2006. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511549557.
[5] Australian Federal Government, Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, available at https://infrastructure.gov.au/rail/trains/history.aspx (accessed 12 Mach 2017).
[6] Everett, S., Deregulation and reform of rail in Australia: Some emerging constraints. Transport Policy, 13(1), pp. 74–84, 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.08.003.
[7] United Nations, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1, United Nations, 2015.
[8] SAE International Standard J3016, Levels of Driving Automation, available at http:// standards.sae.org/j3016_201609/, September 2016 (accessed 20 May 2017).
[9] Painter, M., Collaborative Federalism: Economic Reform in Australia in the 1990s, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, 2009.
[10] Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries, VFACTS National Report, New Vehicle Sales, December 2015.
[11] Stigler, G.J., The optimum enforcement of laws. Journal of Political Economy, 78(3):526–536, 1970. DOI: 10.1086/259646.
[12] Posner, R.A., Theories of Economic Regulation, NBER Working Paper No. 41, 1974.
[13] Fels, A., The political economy of regulation. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 5, pp. 29–60, 1982. http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/issue/volume-5-no-1
[14] Glancy, D.J., Peterson, R.J. & Graham, K.F., A Look at the Legal Environment for Driverless Vehicles, Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Legal Program, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2015.
[15] Head, B.W., Three lenses of evidence‐based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), pp. 1–11, 2008. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932.
[16] Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E., Consensus building and complex adaptive system: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), pp. 412–423, 1999. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9301200209.
[17] Hemmati, M., Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability, Routledge: London, 2002.
[18] Guidelines for Public Road Testing of Automated Driving Systems, Japan National Police Agency, 2016.
[19] Testing Autonomous Vehicles in New Zealand, New Zealand Government, Ministry of Transport ISBN 978-0-478-07275-4, available at http://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/ Uploads/Our-Work/Images/T-Technology/Testing-Autonomous-Vehicles-in-NewZealand.pdf, 2016 (accessed 1 May 2017).
[20] UK Department of Transport, The Pathway to Driverless Cars: A Code of Practice for Testing, available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/446316/pathway-driverless-cars.pdf, 2015 (accessed 1 May 2017).
[21] State of Florida, Department of State, Laws of Florida Ch. 2016-239, available at http:// laws.flrules.org/2016/239, 2016 (accessed 1 May 2017).
[22] State of Nevada: Department of Motor Vehicles, Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 482A – Autonomous Vehicles, available at https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nac/NAC-482A. html, 2016 (accessed 1 May 2017).
[23] VicRoads, Schedule of Amendments to UK Code of Practice, available at https://www. vicroads.vic.gov.au/safety-and-road-rules/vehicle-safety/automated-and-connectedvehicles/testing-of-automated-vehicles, 2016 (accessed 1 May 2017).
[24] Western Australian Department of Mines and Petroleum, Code of Practice: Safe Mobile Autonomous Mining in Western Australia, available at http://www.dmp. wa.gov.au/Documents/Safety/MSH_COP_SafeMobileAutonomousMiningWA.pdf, 2015 (accessed 1 April 2017).
[25] SAE International, Standard – SAE J3018: Guidelines for Safe On-Road Testing of SAE Level 3, 4 and 5 Prototype Automated Driving Systems (ADS), available at http:// standards.sae.org/j3018_201503/, 2015 (accessed 12 February 2017).
[26] South Australian Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Motor Vehicles (Trials of Automotive Technologies) Amendment Act 2016, available at https://www. legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/V/A/2016/MOTOR%20VEHICLES%20(TRIALS%20 OF%20NEW%20AUTOMOTIVE%20TECHNOLOGIES)%20AMENDMENT%20 ACT%202016_10.aspx, 2016 (accessed 1 May 2017).
[27] South Australian Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure, Supplementary advice on the department website: http://dpti.sa.gov.au/driverlessvehicles (accessed 1 May 2017).
[28] Lijphart, A., Comparative politics and the comparative method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), pp. 682–693, 1971. DOI: 10.2307/2108772.
[29] Finifter, A.W., Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, The American Political Science Association: Washington, DC, 1993.
[30] New South Wales Government, Department of Industry, Lands, Roads website, available at http://www.crownland.nsw.gov.au/crown_lands/roads, New South Wales Department of Industry–Lands & Forestry, July 2017 (accessed 1 May 2017).