Assessing the Potential for a New Suburban Rail: Do User Characteristics Matter?

Assessing the Potential for a New Suburban Rail: Do User Characteristics Matter?

S. Basbas | A. Nikolaidou | P. Papaioannou | I. Politis

Faculty of Rural & Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Faculty of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Available online: 
2 September 2017
| Citation



This article examines the role user-specific characteristics can play on assessing a new public transit service. The case under consideration is the new Western Suburban Rail service in Thessaloniki, Greece, which will cover a suburban area. Binary logit models were developed in order to investigate the potential demand for this project. A revealed and stated preference questionnaire survey was conducted. The sample of the survey was stratified according to the three current travel options, namely car, regular-fare bus and low-fare bus. The revealed preference survey included questions about trip and socio-economic characteristics of each user. The stated preference part examined the potential for the new mode in comparison to the current travel modes through changes in travel cost, travel time and number of transfers. Six binary logit choice models were developed in total, two for each user group. For each group, a simplified model was initially calibrated only with the mode-specific variables; at a next step user-specific variables were added and a second extended model was created. The results show significant relationship of mode- and user-specific variables to the final choice for all the three user groups. Likelihood ratio tests were used to examine whether user-specific attributes improve the overall fit of the models or not, compared to traditional choice models of travel time, travel cost and number of transfers. The outcomes show that the inclusion of user-specific variables improved the overall fit and the explanatory power of the models. 


choice models, discrete choice models, revealed and stated preference, suburban rail, time and cost elasticities.


[1] Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S., & Vougioukas, M., The use of stated preference techniquein evaluating a passenger information system: The EuroBus/Popins/Thepis experience.Public Transport Planning and Operations. Proceedings of Seminar, Held at the PTRCEuropean Transport Forum, Brunel University: England, 1996.

[2] Basbas S., Stated preference surveys and the valuation of urban transport systems.Proceedingsof the 14th International Conference: Urban Transport and the Environmentin the 21st Century – Urban Transport XIV, ed. C.A. Brebbia, Vol. 101, Wessex Instituteof Technology, Transactions on the Built Environment, Malta, 1–3 September 2008,pp. 3–14.

[3] Hensher, D.A. & Button, J., Handbook of Transport Modeling, 3rd ed., Pergamon:Sydney,2000.

[4] TREDIT S.A., Users' Survey Design of the Services of TRAINOSE, Education ofResearchersand Data Analysis for the Project RAIL4SEE – Cities of Southeast Europeas Rail Links, Thessaloniki, 2014.

[5] Nikolaidou, N., Development of Binary Choice models for the case of a Suburban RailIn the City of Thessaloniki, Greece, Master Thesis, Interdepartmental Course ‘Design,Planning and Organization of Transport Systems’, Supervisor: Prof. Panos Papaioannou,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, 2014.

[6] Dyer, C., Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods and Statistics, BlackwellPublishing: Hodoken, NJ, 2006.

[7] Basbas, S., Tetou, V. & Politis, I., Ordinal and binary logistic logit models for examinationof behavioral, infrastructure and perception factors influencing biking. Proceedingsof the 19th International Conference: Urban Transport and the Environment in the21st Century – Urban Transport XIX, ed. C.A. Brebbia, Vol. 130, Wessex Institute ofTechnology,WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, Kos, Greece, 29–31 May 2013,pp. 573–584.

[8] Ben-Akiva, M.E. & Lerman, S.R., Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application toTravel Demand, Vol. 9. MIT press, 1985.

[9] Shumacher, R.E. & Lomax, R.G., A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling,2nd ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.

[10] King, J.E., Standardized coefficients in logistic regression. Paper Presented at theAnnualMeeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX,2007.

[11] Dunne, J.P., Elasticity measures and disaggregate choice models. Journal of TransportEconomics and Policy, XV111(2), pp. 189–197, 1984.

[12] Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A. & Swait, J., Stated Choice Methods, Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press, 2000

[13] Litman, T., Understanding Transport Demands and Elasticities: How Prices and OtherFactors Affect Travel Behavior. Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2013.