Who Uses a Mobility Card? A Case Study on the WienMobil Card

Who Uses a Mobility Card? A Case Study on the WienMobil Card

C. Link A. Heinemann R. Gerike H. Jonuschat M. Maryschka

Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Science (BOKU), Vienna, Austria

Institute for Integrated Transport Planning and Traffic Engineering, Technical University (TU) Dresden, Germany

InnoZ GmbH, Berlin, Germany

WienIT, Vienna, Austria

Page: 
225-234
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V1-N2-225-234
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
31 January 2017
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Cheap, fast, comfortable and environmental-friendly – people travelling inter- or multimodal can utilize the advantages of different transport modes by selecting or combining those which best meet their specific requirements in terms of trip purposes or travel patterns. However, there are barriers to inter- or multimodal travel behaviour. Mobility cards such as the WienMobil card might be the solution to break some of them. They enable to use several mobility services and modes of transport. The WienMobil card was introduced in spring 2015 and combines an annual PT ticket and access to both – a bike- and carsharing scheme. Additionally cardholders can use it to pay for taxi rides as well as get discounts for certain services like using the airport express train, for charging electric vehicles and for using urban car park facilities. The impacts of the WienMobil card are currently analysed in the project Guide2Wear using a pre-post-control-group approach. It includes a Web survey and two GPS-tracking periods, each covering an entire week. This article describes the first users of the WienMobil card, the so-called lead users with regard to socio-demographics, their mobility behaviour as well as their mobility-related expectations and requirements. The control group consists of annual PT ticket owners. The lead users are younger, more often male and have an above-average education level. Their mobility behaviour can be marked as more multimodal already before they used the WienMobil card. However, differences are even more pronounced in terms of perceived and real mobility behaviour. Considering attitudes towards public transport, there are no clear group differences.

Keywords: 

intermodality, lead users, mobility behaviour, mobility card, multimodality, public transport

  References

[1] Ahrens, G.-A., et al., Interdependenzen zwischen Fahrrad-und ÖPNV-Nutzung–Analysen. Strategien und Maßnahmen einer integrierten Förderung in den Städten, 2009.

[2] Stopka, U., Pessier, R. & Fischer, K., User requirements for intermodal mobility applications and acceptance of operating concepts, Human-Computer Interaction: Design and Evaluation, 9169, pp. 415–425, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_39.

[3] Dacko, S.G. & Spalteholz, C., Upgrading the city: enabling intermodal travel behaviour. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, pp. 222–235, 2014.

[4] Shaheen, S., Guzman, S. & Zhang, H., Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143: pp. 159–167, 2010. DOI: 10.3141/2143-20.

[5] Riley, P. & Kumpoštová,A.  Recommendations of the LINK project: European forum on intermodal passenger travel. in Proceedings of the European Transport Conference. 2010. Citeseer.

[6] Civitas. Introduction of the new urban mobility card: Brescia oMnibus card. Brescia, first city in Italy. 2011 [cited 2016]; Available from: www.civitas.eu/sites/default/files/abstract-omnibus_card_brescia.pdf, accessed 10 April 2016.

[7] Simhoffer, D. & Oostrom, C., Utrecht Accessible Platform of cooperation between: Infrastructure authorities, Public Transport authorities and Trade & Industry. 2012.  Available from: www.civitas.eu/sites/default/files/presentation20ua.pdf, accessed 14 March 2016.

[8] Kleine, C. & Natus, K., Ticket mobil in düsseldorf vereint bahn, bus, auto und fahrrad. tarifangebot setzt auf multimodalität und neues mobilitätsverhalten. Nahverkehr, 30(6),p.14, 2012.

[9] Bestmann, D., Multimodale mobilitaet in Hamburg-switchh. Nahverkehrs-Tage 2013: Neue Konzepte für Stadt und Land, 24, p. 125–144, 2014.

[10] Gubbi, J., et al., Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7) pp. 1645–1660, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010.