A Sustainability Framework for Engineering Carbon Capture Soil in Transport Infrastructure

A Sustainability Framework for Engineering Carbon Capture Soil in Transport Infrastructure

B.W. Kolosz M.A. Goddard | M.E. Jorat | J. Aumonier | S.P. Sohi D.A.C. Manning

School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, UK

School of Geosciences, Edinburgh University, UK

Available online: 
25 May 2016
| Citation



Recent research has demonstrated considerable potential for artificial soils to be designed for carbon capture. The incorporation of quarry fines enables the accumulation of atmospheric COin newly formed carbonate minerals. However, the rate and trajectory of carbon accumulation has been little studied. The relative contribution of biotic (e.g. vegetation, micro-organisms) and abiotic (water, light, temperature) factors to the carbonation process is also unknown. This article presents a sustainability framework which aims to determine the multi-functionality of soils to which fines have been added not only in their role as carbon sinks but also in their role of providing additional opportunities for improvement to ecosystem services. Such frameworks are required specifically where land designed for CO2 capture must also provide other ecosystem services, such as flood mitigation and biodiversity conservation. land within linear transport infrastructure provides a case study, focusing on 238,000 ha of vegetated land associated with roadside verges in the UK. Hypothetically this area could remove 2.5 t COper year from the atmosphere, equivalent to 1% 2011 total UK emissions or 2% of current  transport emissions and saving an equivalent of £1.1 billion in non-traded mitigation values. roadside verges should be designed to minimize flooding onto the highway and perform other important functions such as removal of dust and suspended solids from surface waters. Vegetation on 30,000 ha of railway land also provides opportunities for carbon sequestration, but management of this vegetation is subject to similar constraints to protect the rail tracks from debris extending from autumn leaves to fallen trees.


carbon capture and storage, mineral carbonation, soil science, sustainability, urban transport


[1] B oot-Handford, M.E., Abanades, J.C., Anthony, E.J., Blunt, M.J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernandez, J.R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J.P., Haszeldine, R.S., Heptonstall, P., Lyngfelt, A., Makuch, Z., Mangano, E., Porter, R.T.J., Pourkashanian, M., Rochelle, G.T., Shah, N., Yao, J.G. & Fennell, P.S., Carbon capture and storage update. Energy & Environmental Science, 7(1), pp. 130–189, 2014. DOI: 10.1039/C3EE42350F.

[2] Schmidt, M.W.I., Torn, M.S., Abiven, S., Dittmar, T., Guggenberger, G., Janssens, I.A., Kleber, M., Kogel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Manning, D.A.C., Nannipieri, P., Rasse, D.P., Weiner, S. & Trumbore, S.E., Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 478(7367), pp. 49–56, 2011. DOI: 10.1038/nature10386.

[3] Washbourne, C.-L., Lopez-Capel, E., Renforth, P., Ascough, P. & Manning, D.A.C., Rapid removal of atmospheric CO2 by urban soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015. DOI: 10.1021/es505476d.

[4] B erner, R.A., Lasaga, A.C. & Garrels, R.M., The carbonate-silicate geochemical cycle and its effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the past 100 million years. American Journal of Science, 283(7), pp. 641–683, 1983. DOI: 10.2475/ajs.283.7.641.

[5] B erner, R.A. & Lasaga, A.C., Modeling the geochemical carbon cycle. Scientific American, 260, pp. 74–81, 1989. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0389-74.

[6] Nettleton, W.D., Occurrence, characteristics, and genesis of carbonate, gypsum, and silica accumulations in soils. SSSA special publication (USA), 1991. 

[7] R enforth, P. & Manning, D.A.C., Laboratory carbonation of artificial silicate gels enhanced by citrate: Implications for engineered pedogenic carbonate formation. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(6), pp. 1578–1586, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.09.001.

[8] M anning, D.A.C., Renforth, P., Lopez-Capel, E., Robertson, S. & Ghazireh, N., Carbonate precipitation in artificial soils produced from basaltic quarry fines and composts: An opportunity for passive carbon sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 17, pp. 309–317, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.05.012.

[9] Jorat, M.E., Goddard, M.A., Kolosz, B.W., Sohi, S. & Manning, D.A.C., Sustainable Urban Carbon Capture: Engineering Soils for Climate Change (SUCCESS), in the 16th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (XVI ECSMGE 2015). Edinburgh, UK, 2015.

[10] DECC, UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions – 1st Quarter 2015 Provisional Figures, UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, ed. D.o.E.a.C. Change, Department of Energy and Climate Change: London, UK, 2015.

[11] Highways England, Highways Agency Carbon Routemap: Oppurtunities for a national low carbon transportation, ed. ARUP, 2014.

[12] DfT, Road Traffic Forecasts 2015, ed. DfT, DfT: London, 2015.

[13] DfT, Transport Appraisal Guidance A3 (3.4): Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Department for Transport: London, 2014.

[14] G rant, S., Rekhi, N., Pise, N., Reeves, R., Matsumoto, M., Wistrom, A., Moussa, L., Bay, S. & Kayhanian, M., A review of the contaminants and toxicity associated with particles in stormwater runoff. Terminology, 2, p. 2, 2003. 

[15] E uripidou, E. & Murray, V., Public health impacts of floods and chemical contamination.Journal of Public Health, 26(4), pp. 376–383, 2004. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh163.

[16] M ontanelli, F. & Recalcati, P. Geogrid reinforced railways embankments: design concepts and experimental test results. IABSE Symposium Report. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 2003.

[17] Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D. & Suh, S., Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), pp. 1–21, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018.

[18] G uinée, J., Udo de Haes, H. & Huppes, G., Quantitative life cycle assessment of products:1: Goal definition and inventory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(1), pp. 3–13, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0959-6526(93)90027-9.

[19] G uinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., Udo de Haes, H.A. & Huppes, G., Quantitative life cycle assessment of products: 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(2), pp. 81–91, 1993. DOI: 10.1016/0959-6526(93)90046-E.

[20] R ebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W., Suh, S., Weidema, B. & Pennington, D., Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 30(5), pp. 701–720, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005.

[21] M athiesen, B.V., Münster, M. & Fruergaard, T., Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(15), pp. 1331–1338, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.009.

[22] Sandén, B.A. & Karlström, M., Positive and negative feedback in consequential lifecycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(15), pp. 1469–1481, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.005.

[23] B rander, M., Tipper, R., Hutchison, C. & Davis, G., Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. Technical paper TP-090403-A, Ecometrica Press: London, UK, 2009.

[24] C hen, I.C., Fukushima, Y., Kikuchi, Y. & Hirao, M., A graphical representation for consequential life cycle assessment of future technologies. Part 1: methodological framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(2), pp. 119–125. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-011-0356-9.

[25] Kolosz, B.W., Goddard, M.A., Jorat, M.E., Sohi, S. & Manning, D.A.C., Developing lifecycle inventory indices for estimating the carbon sequestration of artificially engineered soils and plants. 5th Asian Conference on Sustainability, Energy, and the Environment. Kobe, Japan, 2015.

[26] B runner, P.H. & Rechberger, H., Practical handbook of material flow analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(5), pp. 337–338, 2004. DOI: 10.1007/BF02979426.

[27] Sentance, A., Developing transport infrastructure for the Low Carbon Society. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3), pp. 391–410, 2009. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grp026.

[28] M illard-Ball, A. Transport in the Global Carbon Market: Baseline Challenges With Sectoral No-Lose Targets, Washington DC, 2010.

[29] Fujiwara, N., The merit of sectoral approaches in transitioning towards a global carbon market. CEPS Special Report, Centre for European Policy Studies, 2010.