OPEN ACCESS
The valuation of services linked to the coastal environment can provide useful information for decision-makers and, therefore, contribute to costal management strategies. By focussing on services in terms of uses, this case study particularly aims at evaluating the socio-economic activities along the French Mediterranean coast and the corresponding sensitivity to a major pollution event. The assessment comprises a large spectrum of coastal activities (market and non market) that are directly or indirectly linked to seawater quality. To estimate their values (monetary and nonmonetary), quantitative and semi-quantitative measures were used. These values, translated into indexes and presented in their geographical context, allow a socio-economic sensitivity map-ping of the French Mediterranean coastal zones as a tool for spatial planning for decision-makers. The resulting maps help to identify and characterize coastal zones that are particularly sensitive to anthropogenic impacts such as marine pollution.
Accidental marine pollution, coastal services, decision management tool, economic valuation, Mediterranean Sea, sensitivity mapping
[1] De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A. & Boumans, R.M.J., A typology for the classification, descrip-tion and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41, pp. 393–408, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7
[2] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and human well-being: coastal systems, available at http://www.millenniumassessment.org, 2006.
[3] Beaumont, N.J., Austen, M.C., Atkins, J.P., Burdon, D., Degraer, S., Dentinho, T.P., Derous, S., Holm, P., Horton, T., van Ierland, E., Marboe, A.H., Starkey, D.J., Townsend, M. & Zarzycki, T., Identification, definition and qualification of goods and services provided by marine biodi-versity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54, pp. 253–265, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003
[4] Ledoux, L. & Turner, R.K., Valuing ocean and coastal resources: a review of practical ex-amples and issues for further action. Ocean & Coastal Management, 45, pp. 583–616, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0964-5691(02)00088-1
[5] Skourtos, M.S., Kontogianni, A.D., Georgiou, S. & Turner, R.K., Valuing coastal systems. Managing European Coasts: Past, Present and Future, eds. Vermaat et al., Springer Verlag: Berlin, pp. 119–133, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27150-3_6
[6] Beaumont, N.J., Austen, M.C., Mangi, S.C. & Townsend, M., Economic valuation for the con-servation of marine biodiversity. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 56, pp. 386–396, 2008. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.11.013
[7] Remoundou, K., Koundouri, P., Kontogianni, A., Nunes, P.A.L.D. & Skourtos, M., Valuation of natural marine ecosystems: an economic perspective (review). Environmental Science & Policy, 12/7, pp. 1040–1051, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.06.006
[8] Brenner, J., Jiménez, J.A., Sardá, R. & Garola, A., An assessment of the non-market value of ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean & Coastal Manage-ment, 53, pp. 27–38, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.10.008
[9] Nunes, P.A.L.D. & van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or non-sense? Ecological Economics, 39, pp. 203–222, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00233-6
[10] Norgaard, R.B., Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69, pp. 1219–1227, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecole-con.2009.11.009
[11] Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G. & Nunes, P.A.L.D., Economic valuation of biodiversity: a com-parative study. Ecological Economics, 67, pp. 217–231, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2008.03.003
[12] UNESCO, A Handbook for Measuring the Progress and Outcomes of Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management. IOC Manuals and Guides, 46, ICAM Dossier, 2, UNESCO: Paris, pp. 40–51, 2006.
[13] Hussain, S.S., Winrow-Griffin, A., Moran, D., Robinson, L.A., Fofana, A., Paramor, O.A.L. & Frid, C.L.J., An ex ante ecological economic assessment of the benefits arising from marine protected areas designation in the UK. Ecological Economics, 69/4, pp. 828–838, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.007
[14] Garza-Gil, M.D., Prada-Blanco, A. & Vásquez-Rodríguez, M.X., Estimating the short-term economic damages from the Prestige oil spill in the Galician fisheries and tourism. Ecologi-cal Economics, 58, pp. 842–849, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.009
[15] Loureiro, M.L., Ribas, A., López, E. & Ojea, E., Estimated costs and admissible claims linked to the Prestige oil spill. Ecological Economics, 59, pp. 48–63, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.001
[16] Denis, J., Développement et validation de méthodes de classification de la zone côtière (une contribution à sa gestion intégrée). Doctoral thesis, Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III): 342 pp, 1997.
[17] Duffa, C., Mercat-Rommens, C. & Thébault, H., Radioecological sensitivity project on the French Mediterranean coastal environment. CIESM, Rapport Commission International Mer Mediterranee, 38, p. 666, 2007.
[18] REMPEC (Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea). Protecting the Mediterranean against maritime accidents and illegal discharges from ships. REMPEC: Malta, p. 38, 2002. www.rempec.org.
[19] Ferraro, G., Bulgarelli, B., Meyer-Roux, S., Muellenhoff, O., Tarchi, D. & Topouzelis, K., The use of satellite imagery from archives to monitor spills in the Mediterranean Sea. Remote Sensing of the European Seas, eds. V. Barale & M. Gade, Springer Verlag: Berlin, pp. 371–382, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6772-3_28
[20] Scheurle, C., Thébault, H. & Duffa, C., Towards a decision support tool: sensitivity mapping of the French Mediterranean coastal environment. Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment III. WIT Transaction on Ecology and the Environment, 131, pp. 135–145, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/eeia100121
[21] http://www.pescarecreativaresponsable.es/docs/synthese_finale_peche_recreative.pdf
[22] Polomé, P., Marzetti, S. & Van der Veen, A., Economics and social demands for coastal protection. Coastal Engineering, 52, pp. 819–840, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. coastaleng.2005.09.009
[23] CGDD (Commissariat Général au Développement Durable). Le littoral : chiffres-clés. Etudes & Documents no. 32. SOES, MEDDTL, 35 pp, 2010.
[24] Mangos, A., Bassino, J.P. & Sauzade, D., Valeur économique des bénéfices soutenables prove-nant des écosystèmes marins méditerranéens. Les Cahiers du Plan Bleu. Plan Bleu : Valbonne, 95 pp., 2010.
[25] http://sih.ifremer.fr/
[26] CIESM. Economic valuation of natural and marine ecosystem. CIESM Workshop Monograph no. 37, CIESM: Monaco, 112 pp, 2008.
[27] Levratto, N. & Clemenceau, I., Elaboration d’un indice de vulnérabilité socio-économique d’un littoral: une application au cas de la Corse. VertigO, 6(3), pp. 1–16, 2005. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.2470