Preserving, Reconstructing and Enhancing the Place Identity: Identifying Principles of Urban Sustainability with Placemaker Method

Preserving, Reconstructing and Enhancing the Place Identity: Identifying Principles of Urban Sustainability with Placemaker Method

M. SEPE

IRAT-National Research Council, DiARC – University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Page: 
277-300
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V9-N2-277–300
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
30 April 2014
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The changes that are occurring as a result of mutations in interpersonal and intergenerational relationships, globalisation and new technologies have led to phenomena of homogenisation of territorial specificities, but by the same token have also prompted further discussion concerning the importance of identity of place. Present-day urban conditions appear rich in differentiation with regard to the times and ways in which the city is used, for the new typologies of spaces and the change in the modalities of use of those already existing. In order to identify, represent and design the complex transformations in the contemporary city transversal and multi-level methods of analysis and design are being elaborated and experimented capable of representing and making leg-ible the urban complexity that confronts us today.

Starting from these premises, the aim of this paper is to illustrate PlaceMaker method of urban analysis and design, whose flexibility, as is apparent in the three emblematic case studies which will be illustrated, enables it to be used in widely varying contexts and for a range of objectives.

In particular, the experiments were carried out in order to identify the current place identity to be preserved, reconstructed and enhanced. The investigation protocol serves as a guide to be adapted and reinforced at some points, according to the characteristics of the place and the intended purposes. The case studies gave rise to 12 principles for place identity enhancement, created from a reasoned set of blueprints for the various experiments carried out using the original PlaceMaker method which conclude the paper.

Keywords: 

Contemporary city, place identity, PlaceMaker, urban design, urban planning, urban sustainability principles

  References

[1] Lynch, K., The Image of the City, Mit Press: Cambridge, 1960.

[2] Hague, C. & Jenkins, P. (eds), Place Identity, Participation and Planning, Routledge: Abingdon, 2005.

[3] Vale, L.J. & Warner jr., S.B., Imaging the City. Continuing Struggles and New Direction, Center for Urban Policy Research: New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2001.

[4] Butina Watson, G. & Bentley, I., Identity by Design, Architectural Press: Oxford, 2007.

[5] Cullen, G., Townscape, The Architectural Press: London, 1961.

[6] Rose, G., Place and identity: a sense of place. A Place in the World? Place, Cultures and Globalization, ed. D. Massey & P. Jess, Open University/Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1995.

[7] Carter, E., Donald, J. & Squires, J. (eds), Space & Place, Theories of Identity and Place, Lawrence & Wishart: London, 1993.

[8] Christensen, K.S., Cities and Complexity, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1999.

[9] Castells, M., The Power of Identity, Blackwell: Malden, 1997.

[10] Nasar, J.L., The Evaluative Image of the City, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, 1998.

[11] Appleyard, D., Livable Streets, University of California Press: Berkeley, 1981.

[12] Whyte, W.H., The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, Project for Public Spaces Inc.: New York, 1980.

[13] Urry, J., Consuming Places, Routledge: London, 1995.

[14] Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T. & Tiesdell, S., Public Places-Urban Spaces, Architectural Press: Oxford, 2010.

[15] Banerjee, T. & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (eds), Companion to Urban Design, Routledge: London, New York, 2010.

[16] Gospodini, A., Urban space morphology and place-identity in European cities; built heritage and innovative design. Journal of Urban Design, 9(2), pp. 225–248, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/1357480042000227834

[17] Gehl, J., Life between Buildings: Using Public Space, Arkitektens Forlag: Copenhagen, 2001.

[18] Sepe, M., Complex analysis for the sustainable planning and construction of the place identity: the sensitive relief method. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 1(1), pp. 14–31, 2006a. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V1-N1-14-31

[19] Sepe, M., Place and Planning the City: Mapping Place identity, Routledge: London-New York, 2013.

[20] Sepe, M., PlaceMaker: supporting sustainable urban planning. Planning Practice and Research, 21(3), pp. 349–366, 2006b. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02697450601090856

[21] Sepe, M., Anthropic risk and place identity: a method of analysis and a case study. Journal of Urbanism. International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 3(1), pp. 95–121, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17549171003765675

[22] Sepe, M., PlaceMaker method: planning walkability by mapping place identity. Journal of Urban Design, Routledge 14(4), 2009.

[23] Gehl, J., Cities for People, Island Press: Washington, DC, 2010.

[24] Jones, P., Marshall, S. & Boujenko, N., Link and Place: A Guide to Street Planning and Design, Landor Publishing: London, 2008.

[25] Sepe, M., Principles for place identity enhancement: a sustainable challenge for changes to the contemporary city. Proceeding of Sustainable City 2012, WIT Press - Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst, Southampton, 2012.