OPEN ACCESS
This article deals with the importance of European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development through the implementation of afforestation schemes in rural communities. The main aim of the article is to investigate the spatial patterns of afforestation in Greece, the driving factors behind these patterns as well as the degree of the success of the EU policy for forest expansion through afforestation of arable land. Therefore, the focus is on providing a concrete appraisal regarding the contribution of EU 2080/92 and 1257/99 Regulations to the improvement of regional forest status by means of increasing forest areas and improving the local people’s standard of living. The study area covers the entire Greek territory which consists of 51 administrative prefectures. Methodologically speaking, the empirical analysis is based on a multinomial logistic regression model targeted at providing a thorough understanding of the major driving factors that influence rural communities’ response to the regulations. The environmental importance of arable land afforestation is highlighted as well as the extent to which the regulations has met the initial expectations.
afforestation, EU Regulation 2080/92, EU Regulation 1257/99, forest resources, Greece, multifunctional agriculture, multinomial logistic regression, rural development, rural land, spatial analysis
[1] Buttoud, G., Forest policy evaluation in Europe: state of art. Forest Policy and Economics,
8(5), pp. 499–501, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.07.001
[2] Croitoru, L., How much are Mediterranean forests worth? Forest Policy and Economics, 9(5), pp. 536–545, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2006.04.001
[3] Arabatzis, G. & Christopoulou, O., Afforestation of agricultural land as a measure of management and development of rural areas. Sustainable World, Vol. 6, eds E. Beriatos, C.A. Brebbia, H. Coccossis et al., Skiathos Island, 2003.
[4] Kassioumis, K., Papageorgiou, K., Christodoulou, A. et al., Rural development by afforestation in predominantly agricultural areas: issues and challenges from two areas in Greece. Forest Policy and Economics, 6(5), pp. 483–496, 2004. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00079-5
[5] Madsen, L.M., New woodlands in Denmark: the role of private landowners. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 1(3), pp. 185–195, 2003. doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00018
[6] Santos, T., Telleria, J.L., Diaz, M. et al., Evaluating the benefits of CAP reforms: can afforestations restore bird diversity in Mediterranean Spain? Basic and Applied Ecology, 7(6), pp. 483–495, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.baae.2005.11.001
[7] European Union, Assessment of the Application of Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 on the measures of afforestation in the agricultural sector, Luxembourg, EU, 1997.
[8] NSSG, Statistical Yearbook of Greece, Athens, Hellenic Republic, 2004.
[9] Petrakos, G. & Polyzos, S., Regional inequalities in Greece: literature review and estimations of inequalities. Studies in Greek Economy, Vol. 1, eds M. Chletsos, C. Kollias & H. Naxakis, Patakis: Athens, 2005.
[10] NSSG, Yearly Data on Construction Activity in Greece, Pireas, Hellenic Republic, 2005.
[11] NSSG, The Structure of Agricultural Holdings, Pireas, Hellinic Rebuplic, 2003.
[12] Epilogi, The Greek Prefectures, Athens, 1998.
[13] Norusis, M., SPSS 13.0 Advanced Statistical Procedure Companion, Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 2004.
[14] Norusis, M., SPSS 14.0 Statistical Procedures Companion, Prentice Hall Inc.: New Jersey, 2005.