OPEN ACCESS
Septic systems are found on many residential lots. Unfortunately, the lack of maintenance by households results in the failure of these systems. In turn, this has considerable negative environmental, public health, and fi scal consequences. Governments have responded with a plethora of education programs aimed at making households aware of their systems and of the need to maintain them. Nonetheless, failure rates remain high. This article uses public goods theory to show that households do not maintain their septic systems because it is not in their rational self-interest to do so. Educating households is an insuffi cient response. Similarly, it is not in the rational self-interest of local governments to establish effective regulations. State-established regulations, combined with incentives and sanctions to ensure implementation by local governments, appear to offer more environmentally and fi scally sustainable solutions to the problem.
[1] U.S. Census Bureau, American Housing Survey for the United States: 2005, U.S. Census Bureau: Washington DC, 2006.
[2] NESC, Septic systems: a practical alternative for small communities. Pipeline, National Environmental Services Center, 15(3), pp. 1–7, 2004.
[3] Halvorsen, K.E. & Gorman, H., Onsite sewage system regulation along the great lakes and the USEPA ‘homeowner awareness’ model. Environmental Management, 37(3), pp. 395–409, 2006.
[4] USEPA, Voluntary National Guidelines for Management of Onsite and Clustered (Decentralized) Wastewater Treatment Systems, USEPA: Washington, DC, 2003.
[5] Thompson, C.W., Nominees for board of directors. Onsite Journal: National Onsite Wastewater Recycling Association, 12(5), pp. 8–11, 2003.
[6] Chaffee, K.R., A cost-effective modular recirculating fi lter for on-site wastewater systems. Journal of Environmental Health, 63(4), p. 24, 2000.
[7] Rome, A.W., Building on the land: toward an environmental history of residential development in American cities and suburbs, 1870–1990. Journal of Urban History, 20(3), pp. 407–434, 1994.
[8] USEPA, Onsite wastewater treatment systems manual, USEPA: Washington, DC, 2002.
[9] Orfi eld, M., American metropolitics: The new suburban reality, Brookings Institution Press: Washington, D.C., 2002.
[10] Daniels, T.L., When city and country collide: Managing growth in the metropolitan fringe, Island Press: Washington, D.C., 1999.
[11] Harville, B., New tech, new trouble? Stepping up to the challenges of wastewater technology. Planning, 71(7), pp. 36, 2005.
[12] Schueler, T.R., Understanding watershed behavior. The Practice of Watershed Protection, eds T.R. Schueler & H.K. Holland, Center for Watershed Protection: Ellicott City, MD, 2000.
[13] NOAA, Wastewater: the hidden threat of our nation’s changing shoreline. Coastal Services, 7(3), pp. 5, 9, 2004.
[14] McKenzie, C.M., Onsite septic systems: educating the homeowner. Small Flows Quarterly, 3(1), pp. 14–17, 2002.
[15] Tonning, B., The beast in the backyard. State Government News, 44(2), pp. 22–24, 2001.
[16] Nelson, V.I., Dix, S.P. & Shepard, F., Advanced On-site Wastewater Treatment and Management Scoping Study: Assessment of Short-Term Opportunities and Long-Run Potential, Electric Power Research Institute, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, and the Water Environment Research Federation, 1999.
[17] Nelson, A.C., Characterizing exurbia. Journal of Planning Literature, 6(4), pp. 350–368, 1992.
[18] Hanson, M.E. & Jacobs, H.M., Private sewage system impacts in Wisconsin: implications for planning and policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(2), pp. 169–180, 1989.
[19] Lazarean, A., Septic system use in the U.S., unpublished paper, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 2006.
[20] Henderson, V., Urbanization in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 17(1), pp. 89–112, 2002.
[21] Nelson, A.C. & Sanchez, T.W., Debunking the exurban myth: a comparison of suburban households. Housing Policy Debate, 10(3), pp. 689–709, 1999.
[22] Nelson, A.C. & Dueker, K.J., Exurban living using improved water and waste-water technology. Journal of Urban Planning And Development-ASCE, 115(3), pp. 101–113, 1989.
[23] George, R.V., Formulating the right planning problem. Journal of Planning Literature, 8(3), pp. 240–259, 1994.
[24] NESC, Septic systems: a practical alternative for small communities. Pipeline, National Environmental Services Center, 6(3), pp. 1–2, 1995.
[25] Dowall, D.E., The Suburban Squeeze: Land Conversion and Regulation in the San Francisco Bay Area, University of California Press: Berkeley, 1984.
[26] Knaap, G., The price effects of urban-growth boundaries in Metropolitan Portland, Oregon. Land Economics, 61(1), pp. 26–35, 1985.
[27] Solomon, D. & Dersch, E., What to do if your septic system fails, Michigan State University Extension, East Lansing, 1993.
[28] Swann, C., The infl uence of septic systems at the watershed level. Urban Lake Management, 3(4), pp. 821–834, 2001.
[29] USEPA, Response to Congress on use of decentralized wastewater treatment systems, USEPA, Washington, DC, 1997.
[30] McQuillan, D. Groundwater quality impacts from one-site septic systems. 13th Annual Conference of the National Onsite Wastewater Recycling Association, Albuquerque NM, 2004.
[31] Pinnette, S.R., Noble, W.T. & Locke, D.B., Residential Septic System Impacts on Groundwater Quality in Maine: Characterization of Nitrate Concentrations in Domestic Wells at 18 Subdivisions, Maine Department of Environmental Protection: Augusta, ME, 1999.
[32] Evans, S., Hunt, S., Minahan, K. & Zuckerman, M., Recommendations for Effective Septic System Management in the Upper Etowah Watershed, University of Georgia Institute of Ecology: Athens, GA, 1999.
[33] Cramlet, R. & Turyk, N., An Evaluation of Past and Present Water Quality Conditions in Bear Lake, Waupaca County, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin: Stevens Point WI, 2002.
[34] Washington Sea Grant, Health Hazards Associated with Sewage System Failure, University of Washington: Seattle, WA, 2006.
[35] Harris, P.J., Water quality impacts from on-site waste disposal systems to coastal areas through groundwater discharge. Environmental Geology, 26(4), pp. 262–268, 1995.
[36] Matuszeski, W., Notes from Bayside: even at their best, septic systems are bad for the Bay. Bay Journal, 7(1), pp. 28–31, 1997.
[37] Horsley Witten Group, Coastal Protection Program Workshops in Innovative Management Techniques for Estuaries, Wetlands, and Near COastal Waters, Prepared for USEPA, Offi ce of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds: Sandwich, MA, 1994.
[38] Fagergren, D., Tools for turning the tide of deteriorating water quality in shellfi sh growing areas: a decade of experience in Puget Sound, Washington State, USA. Journal of Shellfi sh Research, 18(2), pp. 715, 1999.
[39] Taylor, C., Yahner, J. & Jones, D., An Evaluation of On-site Technology in Indiana, Purdue University: West Lafayette, IN, 1997.
[40] Burgan, M.A. & Sievers, D.M. On-Site Treatment of Household Sewage Via Septic Tank and Two Stage Submerged Bed Wetland, ASAE: Michigan, 1994
[41] Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, The Poisoned Well: New Strategies for Groundwater Protection, Sierra Club: Washington, DC, 1989.
[42] Costanza, R., An Introduction to Ecological Economics, St. Lucie Press; International Society for Ecological Economics: Boca Raton, FL, 1997.
[43] NSFC, So ... Now you Own a Septic System, National Small Flows Clearinghouse, West Virginia University: Morgantown, WV, 1995.
[44] Volusia County, Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Septic Systems ... But Didn’t Know Who to Ask! Volusia County, FL, 2003.
[45] NESC, What Do You Mean My House Has a Septic Tank? National Environmental Services Center: Morgantown, WV, 2003.
[46] University of Arizona Coop Extension, Inspecting Your Household Septic System, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona: Tucson, AZ, 2000.
[47] Silverman, G.S., The effectiveness of education as a tool to manage onsite septic systems. Journal of Environmental Health, 68(1), pp. 17–22, 2005.
[48] Gomez, A., Taylor, M. & Nicola, R.M., Development of effective on-site sewage disposal surveys in King County, Washington. Journal of Environmental Health, 54(5), p. 20, 1992.
[49] Swann, C., A survey of residential nutrient behavior in the Chesapeake Bay, Center for Watershed Protection: Ellicott City, MD, 1999.
[50] Laffont, J.J., Fundamentals of Public Economics, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1988.
[51] Cornes, R. & Sandler, T., The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1996.
[52] Heikkila, E.J., The Economics of Planning, Center for Urban Policy Research: New Brunswick, NJ, 2000.
[53] Hopkins, L.D., Urban Development: The Logic of Making Plans, Island Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
[54] Turvey, R., On Divergences between Social Cost and Private Cost, in Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings, eds R. Dorfman & N. Dorfman, W. W. Norton: New York, 1993.
[55] Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1990.
[56] Ostrom, E., Reformulating the commons. Swiss Political Science Review, 6(1), pp. 29–52, 2000.
[57] Hardin, G., The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), pp. 1243–1248, 1968.
[58] Dorfman, R. & Dorfman, N. (eds), Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings. W. W. Norton: New York, 1993.
[59] Davenport, D., Global Environmental Negotiations and US Interests, Palgrave Macmillan: New York, 2006.
[60] Massachusetts Attorney General & Massachusetts Association of Realtors, Title 5 Facts for Consumers: Important Information REgarding Changes in SEptic SYstem Regulations, Boston, MA, n.d.
[61] Simonson, A., A Snapshot of Septic System REpair Funding in North Carolina: A Comprehensive Catalogue of Policy Options and Funding Resources, unpublished thesis, School of Government, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2004.
[62] Basolo, V., US regionalism and rationality. Urban Studies, 40(3), pp. 447–462, 2003.
[63] Olson, M., The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1965.
[64] Massachusetts State Environmental Code Title 5, Standard requirements for the siting, construction, inspection, upgrade and expansion of on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems and for the transport and disposal of septage. 310 CMR 15.000, 1995.
[65] Corry, M., A case study illustrating the need for a model performance code. Onsite Journal: National Onsite Wastewater Recycling Association 12(5), p. 6, 2003.
[66] Boarnet, M.G. & Crane, R., Travel by Design: The Infl uence of Urban Form on Travel, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2001.
[67] Heikkila, E.J., Microeconomics and planning: using simple diagrams to illustrate the economics of traffi c congestion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(1), pp. 29–41, 1994.
[68] Scholz, J.T. & Stiftel, B., eds, Adaptive Governance and Water Confl ict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning, Resources for the Future: Washington, DC, 2005.
[69] Brueckner, J.K., Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: the case of growth controls. Journal of Urban Economics, 44(3), pp. 438–467, 1998.
[70] Nelson, A.C. & Dawkins, C.J., Urban Containment in the United States: History, Models and Techniques for Regional and Metropolitan Growth Management, American Planning Association: Chicago, IL, 2004.
[71] Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J.H. & Swanstrom, T., Place Matters: Metropolitics for the TwentyFirst Century, 2nd edn, University Press of Kansas: Lawrence, KS, 2004.