Urban Road Pricing and Sustainable Transportation Systems: The Thessaloniki Central Area Case

Urban Road Pricing and Sustainable Transportation Systems: The Thessaloniki Central Area Case

S. Basbas I. Politis 

Department of Transportation and Hydraulic Engineering, School of Technology, Faculty of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Page: 
1-15
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V3-N1-1-15
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Urban road pricing involves direct charging of drivers for the use of the road network, usually during peak periods. The main objectives for the introduction of a road pricing scheme, in a congested city network, include reduction of delays, environmental improvement and revenue increase. These objectives are closely associated with the concepts of sustainable mobility in urban areas with respect to social equity, economic effi ciency and environmental responsibility. This paper attempts to estimate the potential interrelation between urban road pricing and sustainable mobility management policy by modelling the impacts (traffic network operation, environmental indices and revenue) of a hypothetic implementation of cordon tolls in the city centre of Thessaloniki (situated in northern Greece), which faces severe traffic and environmental problems. The evaluation was carried out using the SATURN traffic simulation model, which was developed at the Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, UK. SATURN is a well-known transport analysis model which is widely used. In order to assess the impacts of traffic scenarios, the software runs a simulation-assignment procedure simultaneously using commonly accepted algorithms that originate from transport theory such as all-or-nothing assignment, Wardorp’s principles. The road network used in SATURN for the purposes of this research consists of 813 nodes and 293 zones. Furthermore, an analysis was carried out regarding the contribution of the extracted model indicators to the establishment of an overall strategy concerning sustainable transportation and mobility in Thessaloniki’s central area. Various scenarios were examined depending on the year of the analysis and the alternative transport mode in use. These scenarios were compared with different road charging scenarios. Parameters such as traffic volumes, speed, vehicle emissions were estimated. A comparative analysis of these values in conjunction with the definition of sustainable mobility and development in general was performed, concluding that innovative measures can reassign the trip patterns in urban areas, thereby improving the transport system operation in terms of sustainability. Undoubtedly, the use of powerful assessment tools such as SATURN for the evaluation of the impacts of various Transportation Demand Management measures like road charging will provide valuable assistance to policy makers and the transportation planners involved in the specific process.

Keywords: 

road pricing, sustainable transportation systems, Transportation Demand Management

  References

[1] Shepherd, S.P., Zhang, X., Emberger, G., Hudson, M., May, A.D. & Paulley, N., Designing optimal urban transport strategies: the role of individual policy instruments and the impact of fi nancial constraints. Transport Policy, 13, pp. 49–65, 2006.

[2] Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Sustainable transportation and TDM: planning that balances economic, social and ecological objectives. Online TDM Encyclopedia, updated 9 May 2005, available at www.vtpi.org.

[3] Goldman, T. & Gorham, R., Sustainable urban transport: four innovative directions. Technology in Society, 28, pp. 261–273, 2006.

[4] Litman, T., Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Comprehensive and Sustainable Transport Planning, Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Canada, June 2005.

[5] TransPrice (Trans-Modal Integrated Urban Transport Pricing for Optimum Modal Split), Final Report for Publication, December 1999.

[6] Wong, W., Noland, R. & Bell, M., The theory and the practice of congestion pricing. Transportation Research Part A, 39, pp. 567–570, 2005.

[7] Organization for the Master Plan and Environmental Protection of Thessaloniki, General Transport Study (GTS) of Thessaloniki Metropolitan Area, Denco, Trademco, Infodim, Aggelidis, Truth, SDG, WS-Atkins, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2000.

[8] Urban Transport Organization of Thessaloniki website, www.oasth.gr.

[9] IMPRINT-EUROPE (Implementing Reform in Transport Effective Use of Research on Pricing in Europe), Road Pricing Singapore’s Experience, Brussels, October 2002.

[10] Orange County Transportation Authority, Success in the Fast Lanes – Fiscal Year 2004, Annual Report, January 2005.

[11] Litman, T., London Congestion Pricing – Implications to Other Cities, Victoria Transport Policy Institute: Canada, February 2004.

[12] Shaffer, B. & Santos, G., Preliminary Results of the London Congestion Charging Scheme, Paper no. 04-3979, November 2003.

[13] Van Vliet, D., SATURN v10.4 – User Manual, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, July 2003.

[14] Hellenic Institute of Transportation Engineers (H.I.T.E.), The Aspects of H.I.T.E. on the Occasion of Completion of 25 Years of the Institute’s Establishment, Athens, July 2003.

[15] PROGRESS Project (Pricing Road Use for Greater Responsibility, Effi ciency and Sustainable in Cities), Main Project Report, Version 1.0, July 2004.