Adjustment of Reactor Model in Organic Matter Removal from Wastewater Applying Numerical Residence Time Distribution Analysis

Adjustment of Reactor Model in Organic Matter Removal from Wastewater Applying Numerical Residence Time Distribution Analysis

Tamas Karches

Institute of Water Supply and environmental engineering, National university of Public Service, hungary

Page: 
347-335
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V14-N4-347-355
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Mass balance models in wastewater treatment may overpredict the organic matter degradation in aerated basins, because the simulation tools apply simplified reactor models, which could not represent the actual hydrodynamic and mixing conditions in the reactors. Ineffective reactor zones, short hydraulic circuits could have an effect on the actual performance of treatment process. In this paper, a wastewater treatment plant with a capacity of 10 MLD was investigated, where residence time distribution (RTD) analysis performed with computational fluid dynamics tools determined the actual time for biodegradation, and the biokinetic model could be updated. For the numerical RTD analysis 3D transient multiphase flow with turbulence closure was applied, whereas mass balance modelling used GPS-X simulation tool calibrated by field data. The model results were in good agreement with the measured chemical oxygen demand, total suspended solid values in treated effluent, and this method highlighted the importance of extension of mass balance modelling with hydrodynamic calculations. 

Keywords: 

mass balance modelling, organic matter, reactor models, wastewater treatment

  References

[1] Somogyi, V., Pitas, V., Domokos, e. & fazekas, b., On-site wastewater treatment  systems and legal regulations in the european union and hungary. Agriculture and Environment, 1, pp. 57–64, 2009.

[2] Tchobanoglus, g., burton, f. & Stensel, h.D., Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. American Water Works Association Journal, 95(5), p. 201, 2003.

[3] henze, m., gujer, W., mino, T. & van loosdrecht, m.c., Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, IWA Publishing, 2000.

[4] Samstag, r.W., Ducoste, j.j., griborio, A., Nopens, I., batstone, D.j., Wicks, j.D. & laurent, j., cfD for wastewater treatment: an overview. Water Science and Technology, 74(3), pp. 549–563, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.249

[5] Wicklein, e., batstone, D.j., Ducoste, j., laurent, j., griborio, A., Wicks, j.... &  Nopens, I., good modelling practice in applying computational fluid dynamics for WWTP modelling. Water Science and Technology, 73(5), pp. 969–982, 2016. https:// doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.565

[6] Alvarado, A., Vedantam, S., goethals, P. & Nopens, I., compartmental models to  describe hydraulics in full-scale waste stabilization ponds. Water Research, 46(2), pp. 521–530, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.038

[7] le moullec, y., gentric, c., Potier, O. & leclerc, j.P., comparison of systemic, compartmental and cfD modelling approaches: application to the simulation of a biological reactor of wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Science, 65(1), pp. 343–350, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.035

[8] rehman, u., maere, T., Vesvikar, m., Amerlinck, y. & Nopens, I., hydrodynamicbiokinetic model integration applied to a full-scale WWTP. In 9th IWA World Water Congress and Exhibition, 2014.

[9] meister, m. & rauch, W., Wastewater treatment modelling with smoothed particle  hydrodynamics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75, pp. 206–211, 2016. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.010

[10] Karpinska, A.m. & bridgeman, j., cfD-aided modelling of activated sludge systems–a critical review. Water Research, 88, pp. 861–879, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.008

[11] bencsik, D. & Karches, T., modelling greenhouse gas emissions of a hybrid fixedfilm anammox process treating sludge dewatering centrate in wastewater treatment.  British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 6(4), pp. 250–258, 2016. https:// doi.org/10.9734/bjecc/2016/26725

[12] launder, b.e. & Spalding, D.b., The numerical computation of turbulent flows.  Numerical Prediction of Flow, Heat Transfer, Turbulence and Combustion, Pergamon, pp. 96–116, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-030937-8.50016-7

[13] ferziger, j.h. & Peric, m., computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer  Science & Business Media, 2012.

[14] Pfleger, D., gomes, S., gilbert, N. & Wagner, h.g., hydrodynamic simulations of  laboratory scale bubble columns fundamental studies of the eulerian–eulerian modelling approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 54(21), pp. 5091–5099, 1999. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00261-4

[15] fogler, h.S., Essentials of Chemical Reaction Engineering: Essential Chemical Reaction Engineering, Pearson education, 2010.

[16] Ke, T., Tao, T.W.Z.y .j. & Tian, l.X.l., Impact of Peclet number on heat transfer of oscillatory flow in circular channel. Cryogenics, 3, p. 2, 2011.

[17] Khudenko, b.m. & Shpirt, e., hydrodynamic parameters of diffused air systems. Water Research, 20(7), pp. 905–915, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(86)90180-6