‘The Management Indicator’ from The Point of View of An Urban Assessment

‘The Management Indicator’ from The Point of View of An Urban Assessment

J.E.R. Nieto L.S. Da Silva V. Murtinho C. Rigueiro 

ISISE, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Portugal

CES, Department of Architecture, University of Coimbra, Portugal

ISISE, School of Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Portugal

Page: 
457-467
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-457-467
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The ‘Management indicator’ is one of the less prioritized indicators when we analyze the existing urban sustainable assessment methods. Nevertheless, and according to the opinion of some experts, this indicator should be one of the main as it deals with the involvement of local entities (communities, agencies and government) working together to improve the public services and quality of life of the inhabitants of a specific area. It recognizes the uniqueness of each place, ensuring that the community facilities are properly maintained and are appropriate to the existing population density (PD) of the area, so that a sense of ownership and responsibility is promoted. The main contribution of this paper is to give a complete panorama of the analysis and evaluation for the management indicator, as well as emphasize the importance of this indicator when we are making a sustainable assessment for urban areas or when we are trying to rehabilitate existing neighborhoods.

Keywords: 

management indicator, rehabilitation of urban areas, sustainable assessment tools

  References

[1] Kyrkou, D. & Karthausa, R., Urban sustainability standards: predetermined checklists or adaptable frameworks? Procedia Engineering, 21, pp. 204–211, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2005

[2] Reyes Nieto, J.E., Simões da Silva, L., Murtinho, V, Rigueiro, C. & Gonçalves, A., Ejemplificación de la problemática actual de las ciudades latinoamericanas, a través del análisis de Santiago de Querétaro, Euro-ELECS 2015 Latin-American and Europena Conference on Sustainable Buildings and Communities, Connecting People and Ideas, Guimarães. Portugal, pp. 1837–1846, 2015.

[3] Reyes Nieto, J.E., Simões da Silva, L., Murtinho, V. & Rigueiro, C., An overview of existing methodologies for evaluating sustainability at the urban level. In X Congresso de Construção Metálica e Mista, eds. L. Simões da Silva, P. Vila Real, J. Rocha de Almeida, R. Gonçaves, cmm Press, Coimbra, Portugal. pp. 81–90, 2015.

[4] Moussiopoulos, N., Achillas, C., Vlachokostas, C. & Spyridi, D., Environmental, social and economic information management for the evaluation of sustainability in urban areas: a system of indicators for Thessaloniki, Greece. Cities, 27, pp. 377–384, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.06.001

[5] UNESCO. Educating for a Sustainable Future: A Transdisciplinary Vision for Concerted Action, 1997. EPD-97/CONF.401/CLD.l

[6] Salat, S., Cities and Forms: on Sustainable Urbanism, Editions Hermann: France, 2011. 

[7] BREEAM Communities, Technical Manual: SD202, BRE Global Limited, 2012.

[8] International Organizational for Standardization. ISO 9000: International Standards for Quality Management, International Organization for Standardization: Genéve, Switzerland, 1992.

[9] Lopes, C., City center revitalization in Portugal. Lessons from two medium size cities. Cities, 17, pp. 19–31, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(99)00049-9

[10] Nieto, J., da Silva, L., Murtinho, V., Rigueiro, C. & Gonçalves, A., Conceptual model for the sustainable rehabilitation of medium-size inner cities in Europe: Coimbra, Portugal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000303