Sustainable Cotton Production by Using Cattle to Graze Harvest Residues in Mexico

Sustainable Cotton Production by Using Cattle to Graze Harvest Residues in Mexico

H. Rubio Arias M.A. Flores M.K. Wood M. Gutierrez

INIFAP, Campo Experimental la Campana-Madera, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.

Water Resources Research Institute, New Mexico State University, USA.

Southwest Missouri State University, USA.

9 June 2006
| Citation



Twenty crossbred beef steers and twenty crossbred beef heifers were randomly allotted to two treatments to evaluate the effect of supplementation on animal performance in animals grazing cotton plant residues: (1) 10 steers and 10 heifers were allowed to graze ad libitum in an 8 ha cotton field after harvest, and (2) 10 steers and 10 heifers grazed in a similar field but received 1 kg day−1 of supplement.Water intake and mineral consumption were measured daily. Cotton plant residues were obtained from an adjacent 10 ha field by collecting 12 representative samples using a 1m2 frame, and separating leaves and cottonseeds for lab analysis. Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), cellulose, lignin, silica, calcium, phosphorus and nitrogen ADF were determined. Supplementation did not affect the total weight gain of the steers or the heifers during the 30-day grazing period. The unsupplemented steers gained 0.500 kg day−1, while the supplemented steers gained 0.466 kg day−1. The supplemented and unsupplemented heifers gained 0.266 kg and 0.233 kg day−1, respectively.Water intake did not differ between treatments, but mineral consumption was significantly greater for the unsupplemented calves. The total cotton residues in the soil accounted for about 2,100 kg ha−1 of DM. The economic analysis indicated an increased profitability when using steer calves without supplementation.


grazing, cotton residues, sustainability, economic impact, Chihuahua, Mexico


[1] Secretaría deAgsricultura, Ganadería y Desarrollo Rural (SAGAR), Estadísticas de producción, Anuario, Mexico City, D.F., Mexico, 2001.

[2] Conner, M.C. & Richardson, C.R., Utilization of cotton plant residues by ruminants. J. Anim. Sci., 65, pp. 1131–1138, 1987.

[3] Arndt, D.L., Richardson, C.R.,Albin, R.C. & Sherrod, L.B., Digestibility of chemically treated cotton plant by-product and effect on mineral balance, urine volume and pH. J. Anim. Sci., 51, pp. 215–223, 1980.

[4] Axe, D.E., Dunbar, J.R.,Addis, D.G., Clark, J.G., Curley, R.G. & Helmer, J.W., Feeding value of cotton gin trash in feedlot growing rations, Cattle Feeder’s Day, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, 1981.

[5] Ramalho, F.S., Cotton pest management: Part 4, A brazilian perspective. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 39, pp. 563–578, 1994.

[6] Salinas, G.H. & Saenz, E.P., Avances de Investigación Agrícola en zonas de riego y temporal. Campo Exp. La Laguna, Centro de Investigaciones Agricolas del Norte, Instituto Nacional de Iinvestigacionses Agricolas, Secretaria de Agricultura y Recursos Hidraulicos, Vol. 8, pp. 122–136, 1983.

[7] Ben-Ghedalia, D., Shefet, G. & Miron, J., Effect of ozone and ammonium hydroxide treatment on the composition and in-vitro digestibility of cotton straw. J. Sci. Food Agric., 31, pp. 1337–1342, 1980.

[8] AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 15th edn, Association of Official Agricultural Chemists: Washington, DC, 1990.

[9] Guering, H.K. & Van Soest, P.J, Forage Fiber Analysis, USDA Agr. Sci. Handbook, No. 379, Washington, DC, 1970.

[10] Easly, J.F., McCall, J.T., Davis, G.K. & Shirley, R.I., Analytical Methods for Food and Tissues,NutritionLaboratory,DepartmentofAnimalScience,UniversityofFlorida,Gainesville, FL, 1965.

[11] Boltz,D.F.&Mellon,M.G.,Spectrophotometricdeterminationofphosphorousasmolybdiphosphoric acid. Anal. Chem., 20, p. 749, 1948.

[12] Steel, R.G.D. & Torrie, J.H., Principles and Procedures of Statistics a Biometrical Approach, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill: NewYork, NY, 1980.

[13] CIMMYT,FromAgronomicDatatoFarmerRecommendations:AnEconomicTrainingManual, Vol. 1, Centro Internacional para el Mejoramiento del Maiz y del Trigo, Mexico City, D.F., Mexico, 1988.

[14] McCann, M.A., Craddock, B.F., Preston, R.L. & Ramsey, C.B., Digestibility of cotton plant by-product diets for sheep at two levels of intake. J. Anim. Sci., 68, pp. 285–295, 1990.

[15] Whiting, F.M. & Schuh, J.D., Use of cotton gin trash in the diets of growing dairy heifers. Proceedings,Western Section, American Society of Animal Science,Vol. 39, pp. 399–401, 1988.

[16] Miron, J.D. & Ben-Ghedalia, D., Effect of chemical treatment on the degradability of cotton straw by rumen microorganisms and by fungal cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng, 23, pp. 2863–2865, 1981.

[17] Arndt, D.L. & Richardson, C.R., Digestibility by lambs and performance of lambs and steers fed sodium hydroxide-treated cotton plant by-product. J. Anim. Sci., 54, pp. 377–383, 1982.

[18] Woodman, H.E., & Evans, R.E., The nutritive value of fodder cellulose from wheat straw. I. Its digestibility and feeding value when fed to ruminants and pigs. J. Agri. Sci., 37, pp. 202–206, 1947.

[19] McNally, R.A., Digestion of straw by the ruminant. Biochem. J., 36, p. 392, 1942.

[20] Rodriguez, R. & Rubio, H.O., Incidencia de gusano rosado y picudo del algodón en variedades de tres niveles de maduración y su control con el pastoreo de bovinos en el esquilmo agrícola, Informe Técnico del proyecto PRECI, 2293, Chihuahua, Mexico, 2000.