Planning of Human Activities Based on the Views of Local Authorities in Protected Areas: the Case of Mountain Pelion, Greece

Planning of Human Activities Based on the Views of Local Authorities in Protected Areas: the Case of Mountain Pelion, Greece

O. Christopoulou
E. Trizoni

Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Greece.

Page: 
44-56
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V2-N1-44-56
Received: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Published: 
9 March 2007
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The subject of this paper is the research into the opinions of the local authorities in the region of Pelion, which is a part of the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, with regard to zoning and planning in the region. In particular, the objectives of the present research are: local authorities’ views on current planning and zoning (positive and negative), and on theories for future planning and zoning and the desirability/undesirability of their outcomes; the problems (developmental, environmental and social problems concerning the implementation of Natura 2000) faced in the area; the targets local communities would like to see accomplished by Natura 2000 and their suggestions on how these targets could be achieved; and how to solve local problems. The findings and the conclusions of this research reveal a conflict between policymakers and local ommunities. Much closer collaboration between the two is required before any long-term policy of development can have any chance of success. From this research it was found that local authorities propose: (a) zoning with moderate levels of protection, (b) terms and conditions of protection which focus on hunting and tree-felling and (c) mixed management teams (European, state and local agents.)

Keywords: 

local authorities, protected areas, zoning.

  References

[1] Faust,B.&Smardon,R.,Introductionandoverview:environmentalknowledge,rightsandethics: co-managing with communities. Environmental Science and Policy, 4, pp. 147–151, 2001.

[2] Bess, R., New Zealand’s indigenous people and their claims to fisheries resources. Marine Policy, 25, pp. 23–32, 2001.

[3] Songorwa,A.,Community-basedwildlifemanagement(CWM)inTanzania:arethecommunities interested? World Development, 27(12), pp. 2061–2079, 1999.

[4] Castro, A. & Nielsen, E., Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environmental Science and Policy, 4, pp. 229–239, 2001.

[5] European Committee, Natura 2000 – Managing our Inheritance, Information Leaflet, European Community Department of Academic Publications: Luxemburg, 1998.

[6] Vabizos, G., Zannaki, K, Zafeiropoulos, D. et al., Specialised Environmental Study of the PeninsulasofMagnesia,Volos(inGreek),UniversityofThessalyDepartmentofPlanningandRegional Development, 1996.

[7] Christopoulou, O., Production activities in the ‘Natura 2000’region of Pelion (in Greek). Development Issues the ‘Natura 2000’Region of Pelion, Conference presentation, 7 July 2003.

[8] Christopoulou, O., Network NATURA 2000: Awareness and attitudes of mountain people (the case of a Greek mountain). XVI AESOP Congress, Planning in Border Regions, 10–15 July, Volos, Greece, 2002.

[9] Duquenne, M.N., ed., Local specificities – local dynamics: guide for its investigation (in Greek), act III, University of Thessaly, p. 108.