Comparative experiment of enhanced heat transfer performance between water-based magnetic fluid heat pipe and ordinary water heat pipe under magnetic field

Comparative experiment of enhanced heat transfer performance between water-based magnetic fluid heat pipe and ordinary water heat pipe under magnetic field

Yulin JiaoXinhua Wang 

Shangqiu Polytecnic, Shangqiu 476000, China

Corresponding Author Email: 
gyxxwxh@163.com
Page: 
1116-1120
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.360344
Received: 
15 January 2018
| |
Accepted: 
18 June 2018
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Based on the author’s previous related research and numerical simulation, in this paper the experimental study and theoretical analysis were conducted about the heat transfer characteristics of ordinary heat pipe and water-based magnetic fluid heat pipe under the DC magnetic field by combining the unique properties of magnetic fluid and magnetic field in heat transfer, to verify another new technology and improve the heat transfer enhancement of heat pipes. The comparative experimental results show that under the action of DC magnetic field, the heat transfer performance of the two pipes is directly proportional to the applied magnetic field strength; when the strength of the applied DC magnetic field is 150Gs, the heat transfer rate of the magnetic fluid heat pipe is increased by 15% more than that with no magnetic field; the heat transfer rate of the ordinary water heat pipe is increased by 9% more than that with no magnetic field.

Keywords: 

heat pipe, enhanced heat transfer, heat transfer rate

1. Introduction
2. Experiments
3. Experimental Results and Analysis
4. Result Analysis
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Henan Science and Technology Research Project (152102310236; 162102210362).

  References

[1] Barzi YM, Assadi M. (2015). Evaluation of a thermosyphon heat pipe operation and application in a waste heat recovery system. Experimental Heat Transfer 28(5): 493-510. 

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08916152.2014.913089

[2] Park CD, Chung KY, Tanaka H. (2013). Performance and availability of seawater distiller with heat pipe utilizing low-grade waste heat. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers 37(1): 81-86. https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2013.37.1.081

[3] Djafar Z, Putra N, Koestoer RA. (2013). The utilization of heat pipe on cold surface of thermoelectric with low-temperature waste heat. Mechanics and Materials 302: 410-415. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.302.410

[4] Kezza M, Tabet I, Chieul M, Nafir N, Khentout A. (2018). Analytical investigation of heat transfer of solar air collector by Adomian decomposition method. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems 5(1): 40-45. 

https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.050106

[5] Yakomaskin AA, Afanasiev VN, Zubkov NN, Morskoy DN. (2013). Investigation of heat transfer in evaporator of microchannel loop heat pipe. Journal of Heat Transfer 135(10): 539-546.

[6] Wang Zb, Zhang YB, Wang ZD, Xie SS, Hao Y. (2012). Study on heat pipe sink for cooling high power LED. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 8419: 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1117/12.976018

[7] Fiaschi D, Manfrida G. (2012). Model of vacuum glass heat pipe solar collectors. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Efficiency 1: 194-205.

[8] Du B, Hu E, Kolhe M. (2013). An experimental platform for heat pipe solar collector testing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 17(1): 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.009

[9] Chougule SS, Sahu SK, Pise AT. (2014). Thermal Performance of Two Phase Thermosyphon Flat-Plate Solar Collectors Using Nanofluid. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 136(1): 014503. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025591

[10] Moraveji MK, Razvarz S. (2012). Experimental investigation of aluminum oxide nanofluid on heat pipe thermal performance. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 39(9): 1444-1448.

[11] Jung JY, Kim H, Kim MH. (2012). Effect of ionic additive on pool boiling critical heat flux of titania/water nanofluids. Heat Mass Transfer 49(1): 1-10.

[12] Mohammadi M, Mohammadi M, Shafii MB. (2012). Experimental Investigation of a Pulsating Heat Pipe Using Ferrofluid (Magnetic Nanofluid). Journal of Heat Transfer 134(1): 014504.

[13] Zhang C, Guo Q, Sun J, Liu C. (2018). Comparative analysis for heat transfer performance of heat exchanger single tube model with and without plug-in. Chemical Engineering Transactions 66: 301-306. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1866051

[14] Cao JG, Ding Y, Ma C. (2014). Aqueous Al2O3 nanofluids: The important factors impacting convective heat transfer. Heat and Mass Transfer 50(12): 1639-1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-014-1374-5

[15] Yin SY, Wu ZJ. (2014). Heat transfer characteristics of Fe3O4-H2O nanofluids by external magnetic field. Applied Mechanics and Materials 487: 50-53. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.487.50

[16] Abdolbaqi MK, Azwadi CSN, Mamat R. Heat transfer augmentation in the straight channel by using nanofluids. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 3(3): 59-67.

[17] Wang R, Liu P, Qian Y, Zhan J. (2018). On the integrated design of existing multi-storey residential building and integral solar water heater. Chemical Engineering Transactions 66: 313-318.

https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1866053