District Heating System: Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Aspects

District Heating System: Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Aspects

M. Ravina D. Panepinto M. Zanetti

Politecnico di Torino, DIATI Department, Italy

Available online: 
| Citation



With the need for limiting pollutant emissions, careful management of energy plants should be considered to reduce the footprints that can be caused by these systems. Advantages of district heating (DH) systems have been linked to a decrease in local and global emissions, centralized heat production located outside urban centres, possible utilization of renewable heat sources.

District heating, consisting of the distribution of hot water by means of underground networks for the buildings’ heating and sanitary water, is an ever-expanding technology that allows the optimization of energy resources, with positive consequences in terms of both economic savings and environmental impacts.

The aim of this work is to analyse the district heating system from an environmental point of view, in way to realize a general procedure of evaluation. To this end, the Italian city of Turin is taken as case study. Turin has long been subject to high concentration levels of pollutants, especially NOx and particulate. The environmental compatibility of extending the district heating network is evaluated. Two different tools are used: first, the environmental balance is defined to perform an evaluation of the flux modification at the emission sources; secondly, the atmospheric impacts of emissions are estimated using CALPUFF dispersion model. The results show a future reduction in overall NOx  emission, as well as a reduction of ground level average NOx concentration ranging between 0.2 and 4 μg/m3. This study provides important information on the effects of a change of the energy configuration on air quality in an urban area. The proposed comprehensive methodology is applicable for other similar cases. 


[1] Lake, A., Rezaie, B., Beyerlein, S., Review of district heating and cooling systems for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, pp. 417–425, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.061.

[2] Ravina, M. & Genon, G., Global and local emissions of a biogas plant considering the production of biomethane as an alternative end-use solution. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, pp. 115–126, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.056.

[3] Brattebø, H. & Reenaas, M., Comparing CO2 and NOx emissions from a district heating system with mass-burn waste incineration versus likely alternative solutions – City of Trondheim, 1986–2009. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 60, pp. 147–158, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.11.001

[4] Genon, G., Torchio, M.F., Poggio, A. & Poggio, M., Energy and environmental assessment of small district heating systems: Global and local effects in two case-studies. Energy Conversion and Management, 50, pp. 522–529, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2008.11.010.

[5] Torchio, M.F., Comparison of district heating CHP and distributed generation CHP with energy, environmental and economic criteria for Northern Italy. Energy Conversion and Management, 92, pp. 114–128, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.052.

[6] Jarre, M., Noussan, M. & Poggio, A., Operational analysis of natural gas combined cycle CHP plants: Energy performance and pollutant emissions. Applied Thermal Engineering, 100, pp. 304–314, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.040.

[7] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CALPUFF Modeling System User’s Manual, Version 6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division (MD-14), Research Triangle Park: North Carolina, 2011.

[8] Istat, Italian Population Census, available at http://www.istat.it, 2011 (accessed 6 May 2016).

[9] Fracastoro, G.V. & Serraino, M., A methodology for assessing the energy performance of large scale building stocks and possible applications. Energy and Buildings, 43, pp. 844–852, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.004.

[10] Iren Energia, Torino Nord Plant Continuous Monitoring System, available at http://smetonord.irenenergia.it/tonord/default.asp, 2014 (accessed 20 April 2016).

[11] European Environmental Agency. EMEP/EEA, Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook. Technical Guidance to Prepare National Emission Inventories. EEA Technical Report, ISSN 1725-2237, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2013.

[12] Poggio, A., Maga C. & Benedetti P., Pre-Feasibility Study for the Further Development of the District Heating Network Connected to Cogeneration in the Turin Area. Province of Turin, Italy. Report (In Italian), 2009.432 M. Ravina et al., Int. J. Environ. Impacts, Vol. 1, No. 4 (2018)

[13] Finney, K.N., Chen, Q., Sharifi, V.N., Swithenbank, J., Nolan, A., White, S. & Ogden, S., Developments to an existing city-wide district energy network: Part II – Analysis of environmental and economic impacts. Energy Conversion and Management, 62, pp. 176–184, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.005.

[14] Rezaie, B. & Rosen, M.A., District heating and cooling: Review of technology and potential enhancements. Applied Energy, 93, pp. 2–10, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.020.

[15] Åberg, M., Widén, J. & Henning, D., Sensitivity of district heating system operation to heat demand reductions and electricity price variations: A Swedish example. Energy,41, pp. 525–540, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.02.034.

[16] Fratianni, S., Cagnazzi, B. & Cremonini, R., Wind in Piedmont Region. Series on Climate studies in Piedmont, Vol. 5. Piedmont’s Environmental Protection Agency: Turin, Italy. (In Italian), 2007.

[17] Hanna, S.R., Briggs, G.A., Hosker, R.P., Handbook on Atmospheric Diffusion, Jean S. Smith Publication Editor, 1982.