How Does Targeted Grassing of Arable Land Influence Drainage Water Quality and Farm Economic Indicators?

How Does Targeted Grassing of Arable Land Influence Drainage Water Quality and Farm Economic Indicators?

Antonín Zajícek Petr Fucík Renata Duffková Jana Maxová

Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic

Page: 
344–352
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/EI-V1-N3-344-352
Received: 
N/A
|
Revised: 
N/A
|
Accepted: 
N/A
|
Available online: 
N/A
| Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

A 7-year experiment with grassing of arable land in the catchment recharge zone was conducted in a small (60 ha) agricultural tile-drained catchment (Bohemian – Moravian Highlands, Czech Republic). Together with water quality, the effect of increasing grassland area on selected farm economic indicators was evaluated. The area for grassing was delimitated by the method of relative soil infiltration vulnerability based on the analysis of five-digit valuated soil ecological unit code, available as .shp file at the scale 1:5000. Effect of grassing on farm budget was estimated by comparison of revenues (crop sales and subsidies) with technology costs of three different grassland area proportion within the agricultural land managed by the farm (1 200 ha). It was proved that nitrate concentrations in drainage water were influenced predominantly by the land use of the recharge zones within the drainage subcatchment. The grassing of arable land focused into proper catchment area (recharge zone) demonstrated a significant decrease in both NO  concentrations and N loads by 35% and 25%, respectively. On the other hand, increasing areas of grasslands would lead to decrease of landscape productive service, farm turnover and profit and the bigger dependence on subsidies. That´s why it is necessary to consider the non-productive functions of grasslands also as public service, taking into account the savings in water cleaning costs and the price of increased water retention. Presented approach come forward when setting the subsidies dealing with soil and water protective measures in agrarian landscape.

Keywords: 

nitrate concentration subsidies, recharge area, targeted grassing, technological costs, tile drainage

  References

[1] Fucík, P., Kvítek, T., Lexa, M., Novák, P. & Bílková, A., Assessing the stream water quality dynamics in connection with land use in agricultural catchments of different scales. Soil and Water Research 2008(3), pp. 98–112, 2008.

[2] Doležal, F., Kulhavý, Z., Soukup, M. & Kodešová, R., Hydrology of tile drainage Run off. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B), 26(7–8), pp. 623–627, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S1464-1909(01)00059-4.

[3] Doležal, F. & Kvítek T., The role of recharge zones, discharge zones, springs and tile drainage systems in peneplains of Central European Highlands with regard to water quality generation processes. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2004(29), pp. 775–785, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2004.05.005

[4] Herrmann, A. & Duncker, D., Runoff formation in a tile-drained agricultural basin of the Harz Mountain Foreland, Northern Germany. Soil and Water Research, 3(3), pp. 83–97, 2008.

[5] Zajícek, A., Kvítek, T., Kaplická, M., Doležal, F., Kulhavý, Z., Byst  rický, V. & Žlábek, P., Drainage water temperature as a basis for verifying drainage runoff composition on slopes. Hydrological Processes, 2011(25), pp. 3204–3215, 2011. DOI 10.1002/hyp.8039.

[6] Griffiths, B.S., Hallett, P.D., Kuan, H.L., Gregory, A.S., Watts, C.W. & Whitmore, A.P., Functional resilience of soil microbial communities depends on both soil structure and microbial community composition. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44, pp. 745–754, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-007-0257-z.

[7] Fiala, J., Recent management systems of grasslands – (1st part). Úroda, 6, pp. 9–11, 2002. (In Czech).

[8] Hejduk, S., Grasslands Ecosystem, Perennial Grassland as Landscape Forming Tool. MZLU: Brno, pp. 45–50, 2007. ISBN 978–80–7375–045–9. in Slovak)

[9] Hönigová, I., Vacká  r, D., Lorencová, E., Melichar, J., Götzl, M., Sonderegger, G., Oušková, V., Hošek, M. & Chobot, K., Survey on grassland ecosystem services – Report of the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. Nature conservation agency of the Czech Republic, 78 p., 2012.

[10] Hauck, J., Schleyer, CH., Winkler, K. J. & Maes, J., Shades of greening: reviewing the impact of the new EU agricultural policy on ecosystem services. Change Adaptation Socioecological Systems, 1, pp. 51–62, 2014. DOI: 10.2478/cass-2014-0006

[11] Nováková, E., Karous, M., Zajícek, A. & Karousová, M., Evaluation of ground pen  -etrating radar and vertical electrical sounding methods to determine soil horizons and bedrock at the locality Dehtá re. Soil and Water Research, 8(3), pp. 105–112, 2013.

[12] Janglová, R., Kvítek, T. & Novák, P., Categorisation of soil infiltration capacity based on GIS proceeding of soil survey data (In Czech). Soil and Water Scientific Studies, 2, pp. 61–81, 2003.

[13] Zajícek, A. & Kvítek, T., The effect of grassland focused into recharge areas on nitrate concentration in drainage waters. Sovak, 22(9), pp. 14–17, 2013. (in Czech)

[14] Fučík, P., Zajíček, A., Duffková, R. & Kvítek, T., Chapter 11: Water quality of agricultural drainage systems in the Czech Republic – Options for its improvement. Research and Practices in Water Quality, ed. T.S. Lee, InTech: Rijeka, pp. 241–262, 2015. DOI: 10.5772/59298.

[15] Czech statistical office (CSÚ), www.czso.cz 

[16] Normatives for crop and food production (AGC), available at www.agronormativy.cz (in Czech)

[17] eAGRI Czech ministry of Agriculture (MZe), available at http://eagri.cz

[18] Duffková, R. & Zajícek, A., Evaluation of groundwater quality after mulching and using slurry on grassland. Vodní hospodá rství, 61(7), pp. 290–293, 2011. (in Czech).