Social Sustainable Development or Sustainable Social Development - Two Sides of the Same Coin? The Structure of Social Justice as A Normative Basis for the Social Dimension of Sustainability

Social Sustainable Development or Sustainable Social Development - Two Sides of the Same Coin? The Structure of Social Justice as A Normative Basis for the Social Dimension of Sustainability

THILO J. KETSCHAU 

Department of Business Education and Human Resource Development, Georg-August-University Göttingen

Page: 
338-347
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V12-N3-338-347
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The development of the social dimension of sustainability is discussed in the terminological dualism, which is essential to the concept itself: Sustainable social development (SuSoDe), addressing the idea of a socially sustainable society, and social sustainable development (SoSuDe), regarding the imple-mentation of sustainability in the structure of society. Thereby, the precarious interdependency of both concepts becomes obvious, revealing the necessity of a multidimensional model of social justice as a normative foundation. This model is described in its functional idea as a merging point for the dualism of the development of the social dimension of sustainability and therefore as a framework for social sustainability theory.

Keywords: 

normative, reflexive-dialectical approach, social sustainability, social justice, social develop-ment.

  References

[1] Pufé, I., Nachhaltigkeit, 2nd edn., UVK Verlag: Konstanz/Munich, 2014.

[2] Grunwald, A. & Kopfmüller, J., Nachhaltigkeit, 2nd edn., Campus Studium: Frankfurt a.M., 2012.

[3] Trainer, T., Social responsibility: the most important, and neglected, problem of all? Int. J. Soc. Econ, 32, pp. 682–703, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290510608200

[4] Elkington, J., Cannibals with Forks, Capstone Publishing: Oxford, UK, 1999.

[5] Enquete-Kommission, “Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt” Konzept Nachhaltig-keit. Vom Leitbild zur Umsetzung“ des 12. Deutschen Bundestages, Bonn, Germany, 1998.

[6] Enquete-Kommission, “Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität – Wege zu nachhaltigem Wirtschaften und gesellschaftlichem Fortschritt in der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft” des 17. Deutschen Bundestages, Bonn, Germany, 2013.

[7] UNCSD, Indicators of Sustainable Development. Framework and Methodologies, New York, 1996.

[8] UN World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future: From One Earth to One World. An Overview, Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.

[9] United Nations, Agenda 21, available at http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/ Default.asp?documentid=52, 1993 (accessed 17 August 2016).

[10] United Nations, The future we want. Resolution 66/288, 2012.

[11] Opielka, M., Soziale Nachhaltigkeit aus soziologischer Sicht. Soziologie, 45. Jg., 1, pp. 33–46, 2016.

[12] Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J. & Behrens, W.W., III, The Limits to Growth, Universe Books: New York, 1972.

[13] Meadows, D., Meadows, D. & Randers, J., Beyond the Limits. Global Collapse or a Sustainable Future, Earthscan Publications: London, 1992.

[14] Meadows, D., Meadows, D. & Randers, J., Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update, Chelsea Green: White River Junction, VT, 2004.

[15] Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R. & Grunwald, A., Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet - Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren, Edition Sigma: Berlin, 2012.

[16] Horkheimer, M., Traditionelle und kritische Theorie, Gesammelte Schriften, Band 4, Fischer: Frankfurt am Main, 1988.

[17] Haubach, C. & Held, B., Ist ökologischer Konsum teurer? Statistisches Bundesamt: Wiesbaden, 2015.

[18] Hartman, E., Wie viele Sklaven halten Sie? Campus Verlag: Frankfurt a.M. / New York, 2016.

[19] Horkheimer, M. & Adorno, T. W., Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente, 

21st edn., Fischer Verlag: Frankfurt a.M., 2013.

[20] Marcuse, H., The One-Dimensional Man. Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Indus-trial Society, Beacon Press: Boston, 1964.

[21] Cramme, C., Social Justice in the Global Age, Polity: Cambridge, UK, 2009.

[22] Ekardt, F., Theorie der Nachhaltigkeit. Rechtliche, ethische und politische Zugänge - am Beispiel von Klimawandel, Ressourcenknappheit und Welthandel, Nomos: Baden-Baden, 2016.

[23] Ketschau, T.J., Social Justice as a Link between Sustainability and Educational Sci-ences. Sustainability, 7, pp. 15754–15771, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115754

[24] Winn, M. & Kirchgeorg, M., Sustainability Marketing for the Poorest of the Poor. Bus. Strategy Environ, 15, pp. 171–184, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.523

[25] Oxfam International, An Economy for the 1%. How privilege and power in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped, available at https://www.oxfam. org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf, 2016 (accessed 14 October 2016).

[26] Spannagel, D., Trotz Aufschwung: Einkommensungleichheit geht nicht zurück. WSI-Verteilungsbericht 2015. In WSI-Mitteilungen, Band 68(2015), S. 622–629, 2015.

[27] Kersting, W., Theorien der Sozialen Gerechtigkeit, Metzler: Stuttgart, Germany, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-01668-3

[28] Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Revised edn., Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1999.

[29] Sen, A., Commodities and Capabilities, North-Holland: New York, NY, 1985.

[30] Nussbaum, M.C., Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen & Social Justice. Fem. Econ., 9, pp. 33–59, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926

[31] Sen, A., The Idea of Justice, Penguin Books: London, 2009.

[32] Fichtenbaum, R. & Welty, G., Capitalist morality and social justice: a Marxist Critique. Forum Soc. Econ., 15, pp. 1–17, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751474