Phenomena of Functional Differentiation and Fractal Functionality

Phenomena of Functional Differentiation and Fractal Functionality

Irina Trofimova

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

Page: 
508-521
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V11-N4-508-521
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The phenomena of vertical and horizontal emergence are analysed in terms of functional differentiation (FD), the concept of fractal functionality (FF), the concept of the zone of proximate development and an application to iterative map techniques. These theoretical components are used to trace an evolution of structures at various levels of organization and to derive several universal evolutionary principles. The implications of these principles are: (1) “building blocks” of natural systems are performed uniquely and only once, they emerge, change and disappear, and therefore cannot be considered as Lego-like “bricks” for these systems; (2) “building blocks” develop not prior to, but simultaneously with the emergence of a macro-system, to which they are associated, and may continue to change even after the macro-system is established; (3) the existence of functional groups “on the diagonal” affects the subdivisions of horizontal distributions; (4) soft associations of elements to functional systems of several levels of complexity speaks against a vertical division of complexity levels and against a horizontal division of building blocks.

Keywords: 

diagonal evolution, emergence, functional differentiation FD-3 operators, functionality, neurotransmitters, zone of proximate development

  References

[1] Whitehead, A.N., Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. Gifford Lectures Delivered in the University of Edinburgh During the Session 1927–1928, Cambridge University Press: Macmillan, New York, 1929.

[2] Rosen, R., Effective processes and natural law. In The Universal Turing Machine. A HalfCentury Survey, ed. R.Herken, Oxford University Press, pp. 523–537, 1988.

[3] Goldstein, J., Emergence as a construct: history and issues. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 1(1), pp. 49–72, 1999.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327000em0101_4

[4] Trofimova, I., Universals and specifics in psychology. In Nonlinear Dynamics in Life and Social Sciences, eds. W. Sulis & I. Trofimoval, IOS Press: Amsterdam, pp. 286–307, 2001.

[5] Trofimova, I.N., Who is in charge of science: men view “Time” as more fixed, “Reality” as less real, and “Order” as less ordered. Cognitive Systems Research, 15–16, pp. 50–56, 2012.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2011.07.001

[6] Trofimova, I., Observer bias: how temperament matters in semantic perception of lexical material. PLoS One, 91, p. e85677, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085677, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085677

[7] Cairns-Smith, A., Genetic Takeover, Cambridge University Press, 1982

[8] Gould, S.J., The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. pp. 365–382, 2002.

[9] Vrba, E. & Gould, S., The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology, 122, pp. 217–228, 1986.

[10] Trofimova, I., How people of different age, sex and temperament estimate the world. Psychological Report, 85, pp. 533–552, 1999.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.85.6.533-552

[11] Trofimova, I., Understanding misunderstanding: a study of sex differences in meaning attribution. Psychological Research, 776, pp. 748–760, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0462-8

[12] Dawkins, R., The Blind Watchmaker, Norton & Company: New York, 1986.

[13] Stoltzfus, A., On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 49, pp. 169–181, 1999.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00006540

[14] Stoltzfus, A., Constructive neutral evolution: exploring evolutionary theory’s curious disconnect. Biology Direct, 7, p. 35, 2012.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-35

[15] Gould, S.J. & Lewontin, R.C., The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: 

a critique of the adaptationist program. Proceeding of the Royal Socirty London B, 205, pp. 581–598, 1979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086

[16] Dawkins, R., Climbing Mount Improbable, Norton & Company: New York, 1996.

[17] Barkow, J.H., Darwin, Sex, and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture, University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ON, 1989.

[18] Trofimova, I., Principles, concepts and phenomena of Ensembles with variable structure. In Nonlinear Dynamics in Life and Social Sciences, eds. W. Sulis & I. Trofimoval, IOS Press: Amsterdam. pp. 217–231, 2001.

[19] Sulis, W., Stochastic phase decoupling in dynamical networks. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Science, 124, pp. 327–358, 2008.

[20] Wilson, D.S. & Wilson, E.O., Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 824, pp. 327–348, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/522809

[21] Sulis, W., Collective intelligence: observations and models. In Chaos and Complexity in Psychology, eds. S.J. Guastello, M. Koopmans & D. Pincus, Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–72, 2009.

[22] Trofimova, I., Functional differentiation in developmental systems. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems, ed. Y. Bar-Yan, Perseus, pp. 557–567, 2000.

[23] Trofimova, I., Potapov, A. & Sulis, W., Collective effects on individual behavior: in search of universality. International Journal of Chaos Theory and Applications, 3, pp. 53–63, 1998.

[24] Thompson, J.N., The Coevolutionary Process, University Chicago Press, 1994.

http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226797670.001.0001

[25] Heckman, T.M. & Kauffmann, G., The coevolution of galaxies and supermassive black holes: 

a local perspective. Science, 333(6039), pp. 182–185, 2011.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1200504

[26] Sober, E. & Wilson, D.S., Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1998.

[27] Leontiev, A.N., Problems of the Development of the Mind, Trans. M. Kopylova. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1981.

[28] Altman, J., Three levels of mentation and the hierarchic organization of the human brain. In Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought, eds. G.A. Miller & E. Lennerberg, Academic Press: New York, pp. 90–107, 1978.

[29] MacLean, P., The Triune Brain in Evolution, Plenum: New York, 1989.

[30] Trofimova, I.N., Universal principles of evolution as a foundation for analysis of human nature. Philosophy Research, 3, pp. 5–23, 1995 in Russian.

[31] Trofimova, I., Sociability, diversity and compatibility in developing systems: EVS approach. In Formal Descriptions of Developing Systems, eds. J. Nation, I. Trofimova, J.D. Rand & W. 

Sulis, Kluwer Press. pp. 231–248, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0064-2_13 [32] Geodakyan, V.A., Sexual dimorphism. In Evolution and Morphogenesis, eds. J. Mlikovsky & V.J. Novak, Academia, Praha, pp. 467–477, 1985.

[33] Geodakyan, S.V., Two Sexes. Why? The Evolutionary Theory of Sex, Wilmington, USA, 2012.

[34] Trofimova, I., Do psychological sex differences reflect evolutionary bi-sexual partitioning? 

American Journal of Psychology, 1284, pp. 485–514, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.4.0485

[35] Azmitia, E., Evolution of serotonin: sunlight to suicide. In Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology of Serotonin, eds. C. Muller & B. Jacobs, Elsevier: New York, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1569-7339(10)70069-2

[36] Trofimova, I. & Robbins, T.W., Temperament and arousal systems: a new synthesis of differential psychology and functional neurochemistry. Neurosciences & Biobehavioural Reviews, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.008, 2016.

[37] Trofimova, I., The interlocking between functional aspects of activities and a neurochemical model of adult temperament. In Temperaments: Individual Differences, Social and Environmental Influences and Impact on Quality of Life, ed. M.C Arnold, Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, pp. 77–147, 2016.

[38] Stefano, G.B. & Kream, R., Endogenous opiates, opioids, and immune function: evolutionary brokerage of defensive behaviors. Seminars in Cancer Biology, 18, pp. 190–198, 2008.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2007.12.001

[39] Bodnar, R.J., Endogenous opiates and behavior. Peptides, 32, pp. 2522–2552, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.09.020

[40] Barnsley, M., Superfractals, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2006.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590168