Floristic Inventory and Preliminary Diversity Assessment of the Al-Tar Caves Area, Karbala, Iraq

Floristic Inventory and Preliminary Diversity Assessment of the Al-Tar Caves Area, Karbala, Iraq

Khansaa R. Al-Joboury Ali K. Wannas* Zainab G. Sadeq

Iraq Natural History Research Center and Museum, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq

Corresponding Author Email: 
ali.k@nhm.uobaghdad.edu.iq
Page: 
437-449
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.210212
Received: 
22 December 2025
|
Revised: 
9 February 2026
|
Accepted: 
17 February 2026
|
Available online: 
28 February 2026
| Citation

© 2026 The authors. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Plant diversity in arid and semi-arid regions is strongly shaped by climatic and environmental conditions. This study documented and analyzed the floristic composition of Al-Tar Caves, Karbala, Iraq, and assessed the influence of climatic factors on plant distribution. Field surveys were conducted in 2024 across 17 geo-referenced stations using stratified sampling to represent major habitat types. Species were identified using standard taxonomic keys. Diversity was evaluated using three indices: species richness (S), the Shannon–Wiener index (H′), and Pielou’s evenness (J). Species richness ranged from 5 at Station 16 to 12 at Station 9. H′ varied between 1.49 and 2.31, indicating moderate to relatively high diversity across the study area. J ranged from 0.88 to 0.97, suggesting a generally even distribution of individuals among species. These results reflect spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure among the surveyed stations. Climatic data obtained from the Iraqi Meteorological Organization were compared descriptively with the observed vegetation patterns. A total of 106 plant species belonging to 34 families were recorded, including 96 species from 32 dicotyledon families. Asteraceae was the dominant family (15 species), followed by Amaranthaceae (11 species), while 15 families were represented by a single species, particularly in riparian habitats. Reduced vegetation cover was observed in sites characterized by higher temperatures and low rainfall. Despite harsh environmental conditions, the region supports notable plant diversity, with temperature and rainfall identified as key drivers of spatial variation in species distribution.

Keywords: 

Al-Tar Caves, plant diversity, floristics, species richness, arid zone, limestone terrain

1. Introduction

Karbala is situated in central Iraq, between latitudes 32°10′15″ N and 32°50′15″ N, and longitudes 43°09′41″ E and 44°18′56″ E. The city encompasses 4,987 km². Geologically, the governorate forms part of the unstable shelf of the sedimentary plain zone and the Al-Salman zone. Additionally, it is generally characterized by a topography that gradually declines from the southwest towards the northeast [1]. Due to its strategic location, Holy Karbala is considered one of the most important regions in Iraq in terms of its historical, religious, touristic, and agricultural importance. However, the branch of the Euphrates River that flows through the governorate, together with several irrigation channels, contributes significantly to the groundwater recharge, making groundwater one of the main water resources in the area [2]. The Tar Al-Sayed area, also known as the Al-Tar Caves, is one of the important geological areas in Iraq. It is situated approximately 100 km southwest of Baghdad, in the western part of Karbala Governorate, and south of Al-Razzaza Lake. Covering an area of about one square kilometre, this location possesses unique geological and historical features, which make it a potential candidate for Geopark designation [3].

Plants are essential for land resources, as they play a crucial role in sustaining nature, wildlife, conservation, and ecological balance [4]. However, technological advancement, population growth, industrialization, and various other anthropogenic factors have strained natural resources to their limits [5]. The conservation of plant diversity has received considerably less attention than the conservation of animals, possibly because plants lack the widespread public appeal associated with many animal species [6]. As a result, plant conservation is greatly under-resourced compared with animal conservation [7]. Nevertheless, plants are much more important to humans. Also, animals can provide meat, fur, leather, and other products, but none of these are necessities of human survival and well-being. In contrast, many plant products are essential, as plants supply food for humans and livestock, as well as provide a huge diversity of other products and ecosystem services. These include timber, fibers, clean water regulation, and erosion control. Despite these varieties of products, most commercial plant products are derived from a very narrow range of plant species [8].

Floristic inventories are used to get basic information about the trends in biodiversity, ecosystem performance, and conservation effectiveness [9]. The vegetation structure in the arid and semi-arid ecosystems depends mostly on variation in precipitation, temperature extremes, salinity of soil, and composition of the substrate [10]. Limestone topography, like the Al-Tar Caves region, can tend to create microhabitats that affect species assemblages by having a greater or lesser ability to retain moisture and provide shade. Despite the botanical history of Iraq [11], new regional floristic evaluations are still scarce, especially in centrally located limestone and cave-linked habitats. It has already been mentioned that desert vegetation and riverine systems have been studied in the past [12], but no floristic inventory has been performed regarding the Al-Tar Caves.

Climate change represents a major global challenge addressed at multiple governmental and non-governmental levels. Rising greenhouse gas emissions and increasing atmospheric CO₂ concentrations (eCO₂), along with associated changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, are expected to affect plant ecophysiology, distribution, and ecological interactions. The soils of the Karbala area are characterized by sparse natural vegetation cover and a predominantly arid climate. High evaporation rates, coupled with low annual rainfall, contribute significantly to the depletion of soil organic matter, particularly in uncultivated lands. Furthermore, most soils in the region are calcareous and derived from riverine sedimentary deposits, and they are frequently affected by salinity [2]. In general, Iraq experiences hot, dry summers, during which mean maximum temperatures often exceed 48 ℃ in the hottest months, particularly in the central and southern regions. Winters range from cool to cold, with mean minimum temperatures dropping to near freezing in the north and to approximately 5 ℃ in the south. Annual rainfall varies considerably across the country, reaching up to 1000 mm in the northern mountainous areas but declining to less than 100 mm in the southern and southwestern regions. Approximately 90% of the annual rainfall occurs between November and April [13].

Overall, the Iraqi climate is characterized by two contrasting seasonal extremes. The summer season is long, intensely hot, and dry, with extremely low relative humidity and persistent dry winds that further accelerate evaporation. In contrast, winter is relatively short in the lower plains and is marked by occasional frosts and limited rainfall. These climatic conditions are particularly harsh for plant life, especially in the lowland regions. By the time winter rains arrive, temperatures are often too low to support optimal plant growth. Significant vegetative growth typically occurs only during the brief spring season, just as rainfall begins to decline. During the prolonged summer months, surface water becomes unavailable, and extreme heat combined with low humidity results in severe desiccation [14]. Consequently, only certain plant types can survive in the lower plains of Iraq, notably ephemeral annuals, which rapidly complete their life cycle during spring and remain dormant as seeds for the rest of the year, and deep-rooted, highly xerophytic perennials capable of accessing underground water reserves and withstanding the harsh summer conditions [15].

In line with this, the present study sought to compile a thorough list of the vascular plant species that are present in the Al-Tar Caves region. It also aimed to analyze the floristic structure of the vegetation in the form of family composition, dominant taxa, and to evaluate the spectrum of life forms. Besides this, the research measured the spatial change in species richness among various habitat types. Lastly, it gave an initial explanation of the observed trends in vegetation depending on the current climatic and topographical conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Collection of plants

The current study on plant diversity and habitat characteristics in the Al-Tar Caves region, Karbala, Iraq, was conducted through six field surveys carried out during 2024. Field visitation was arranged to coincide with the flowering and fruiting periods of the recorded plant species. A total of 17 geographical locations were surveyed and georeferenced to provide a distribution map of the collection areas. Upon completion of all research requirements, the dry specimens were deposited in the Natural History Museum’s herbarium / Iraq Natural History Research Center and Museum, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Figure 1. A map of the plant collection stations in the riparian area of the Al-Tar Caves, Karbala, Iraq

Table 1. Coordinates of the stations in the study areas

Station

Coordinate of Stations

1

32°28'53.7"N 43°46'43.1"E

2

32°28'51.7"N 43°46'39.7"E

3

32°28'49.7"N 43°46'40.8"E

4

32°28'47.3"N 43°46'48.5"E

5

32°28'50.3"N 43°46'42.5"E

6

32°28'57.9"N 43°46'49.4"E

7

32°29'06.2"N 43°46'38.3"E

8

32°29'01.6"N 43°47'11.2"E

9

32°28'41.7"N 43°46'54.3"E

10

32°28'41.3"N 43°46'43.3"E

11

32°28'56.5"N 43°45'59.5"E

12

32°28'46.8"N 43°46'17.1"E

13

32°29'22.0"N 43°46'25.7"E

14

32°29'02.6"N 43°45'49.7"E

15

32°29'29.0"N 43°45'52.4"E

16

32°29'52.9"N 43°46'34.3"E

17

32°29'42.8"N 43°47'18.6"E

2.2 Habitat classification

Four types of specimens stations were considered: (1) cave entrance/shaded calcareous slopes (Transitional microhabitats located in or near cave openings with adjacent limestone slopes which is characterized by: reduced solar radiation, higher moisture retention, thin calcareous soils and rock crevices); (2) calcareous plateau (high terrain that may be relatively flat and possibly gently undulating, dominated by exposed limestone rocks which is characterized by flat or gently undulating limestone surface, high temperature and evaporation rates, very shallow and poorly developed soils); (3) riparian margins (zones immediately adjacent to permanent and seasonal watercourses influenced with periodic water flow also higher soil moisture which is characterized by higher soil moisture and alluvial soils); (4) wadi depressions (low-lying channels and basins within ephemeral drainage systems, that water accumulates temporarily following rainfall events which is characterized by Seasonal runoff accumulation and moderate soil depth and sediment deposition).

2.3 Specimens design

The stratified specimens method was used to represent all the types of habitats. In each station, there were three quadrats that were randomly selected, since we have 17 stations, then 17 stations × 3 quadrats = 51 quadrats in total. The size of quads in open habitats was 10 by 10 m, and in cave-related microhabitats, 5 by 5 m, to consider the space limitation.

2.4 Diversity analysis

Species richness (S), the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′), and the evenness of Pielou (J):

H′ = −Σ (pi ln pi)

J = H′ / ln S

2.5 Climatic data

The data on climate (temperature, rainfall, wind speed, sunshine duration) during the years 2019-2023 in the case of Iraq was received at the Iraqi Meteorological Organization and Seismology in Karbala, located approximately 20–30 km northeast for the study area at the Al-Tar caves, so the elevation for the meteorological station (~30–40 m a.s.l.) is lower than that for the specimens stations (~70–120 m a.s.l.), resulting in an elevation difference for about 40–80 m, a descriptive comparison for mean annual values with the distribution patterns for vegetation was made.

2.6 Taxonomic keys

The collected specimens were identified at the Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences Laboratory, Iraq Natural History Research Centre and Museum, University of Baghdad. Species identification was carried out using standard taxonomic keys [16-19]. The accepted scientific names and synonyms of the recorded species were verified according to research [7], while species distribution data were compiled following the methodology described in research [18].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Floristic composition

Plants were collected from 17 stations within the Al-Tar Caves, Karbala, Iraq. Variation was observed in the number of plant species. Several sites exhibited low plant diversity, which may be attributed to their distance from water sources and poor soil nutrient availability. A total of 106 plant species belonging to 34 families were recorded. Among these, 32 families were dicotyledons, comprising 97 species.

3.2 Dominant families

The family Asteraceae was the most species-rich, represented by 15 species, consistent with previous reports [19, 20]. Members of Asteraceae have long been utilized in traditional medicine and human diets. Despite their wide diversity, many species share similar phytochemical characteristics, which may explain their broad ethnobotanical applications. The second most represented family was Amaranthaceae, with 11 species. This family includes annual and perennial herbs, shrubs, and rarely trees. It has a cosmopolitan distribution, occurring in tropical and temperate regions worldwide. Many species within Amaranthaceae are economically important and are widely used as vegetables and in herbal medicine, in agreement with earlier studies [21, 22]. Dominance of Asteraceae and Amaranthaceae is consistent with arid floras of Southwest Asia, where C3–C4 adaptive strategies and drought tolerance enhance survival under seasonal rainfall regimes [23].

3.3 Life-form spectrum

Thirteen families were each represented by a single species in the riparian areas of Al-Tar Caves, Karbala, these families include Apiaceae, Apocynaceae, Capparaceae, Cistaceae, Cleomaceae, Frankeniaceae, Gentianaceae, Lythraceae, Malvaceae, Primulaceae, Rutaceae, Resedaceae, Oxalidaceae, Solanaceae, and Urticaceae. Regarding life-form classification, the study recorded 63 annual herbs, 25 perennial herbs, and 12 shrubs distributed across the study area, indicating the dominance of herbaceous vegetation in this arid environment. Several species were widely distributed across multiple sampling stations. For example, Ammi majus L. (Apiaceae) was recorded in several locations. This species has been described as a wild medicinal plant rich in bioactive compounds and has historically been used as a therapeutic alternative for various diseases [24].

The family Brassicaceae was represented by eight species that were widely distributed among the sampling stations. Brassicaceae is an ecologically and economically important angiosperm family. Previous study [25] has highlighted the taxonomic significance of morphological characteristics such as fruit, seed, and cotyledon traits in the classification of tribes within the family. In particular, seed coat texture is considered a relatively stable taxonomic character, as it is minimally influenced by environmental conditions after seed maturation.

Comparisons and contrasts in the floristic composition recorded in this survey with the other arid and limestone-impregnated areas of Iraq are quite impressive. The national flora of Iraq has approximately 3300 species in 136 families, and the most species-rich families are represented by Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae, and Brassicaceae, which can be found in the deserts, steppes, and riverine plains [26]. On the same note, in the Western Desert District, wild flora was found to be predominantly Amaranthaceae and Asteraceae, regardless of the conditions of extreme ecological variability, and thereafter Brassicaceae and Poaceae. The patterns are congruent with the results of the present study, where drought-tolerant families were prevalent based on the general tendencies of desert vegetation in Iraq and neighbouring Saharo-Sindian and Mesopotamian shrub desert ecoregions including sparse open scrub, halophytic communities, and rapid-growing annuals in response to rain [27]. Nevertheless, the limestone and cave topography in this research site contains more microhabitat complexity than does a flat desert plain and therefore permits a higher richness of local species than would be anticipated by desert flora in the region alone.

3.4 Influence of climatic and topographical conditions on species distribution patterns

Climate is one of the most critical determinants of plant growth and spatial distribution. In the present study, climatic variables were examined to assess their influence on plant distribution within the region. It directly affects plant physiology and indirectly influences soil properties, which are fundamental for plant establishment and sustainability. The flowering periods of the recorded species varied according to environmental conditions, climatic characteristics, and species-specific adaptations, consistent with observations from similar studies [28]. The effects of climatic factors differ among plant families. For instance, rainfall may enhance growth in some species, while others are more adapted to dry conditions. Many members of Asteraceae prefer full sunlight or partial shade for at least six hours daily and thrive in well-drained, loamy soils that retain moderate moisture; excessive watering may lead to root rot. Consequently, variations in temperature and precipitation significantly influence plant diversity and distribution patterns in the study area. Among the most widespread families recorded in this study was Amaranthaceae, which is characterized in many species by efficient carbon fixation mechanisms that enhance adaptation to hot and arid environments, in agreement with previous findings [29], also species richness (S) ranged from 5 species at Station 16 to 12 species at Station 9, Shannon-Wiener index (H′) varied between 1.49 and 2.31, indicating moderate to relatively high diversity across the study area, and Pielou’s evenness (J) values (0.88-0.97) suggested a generally balanced distribution of individuals among species. These findings reflect spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure across the surveyed stations.

Table 2 and Figure 2 which present the Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′) also Pielou’s evenness (J) of the studied stations, are commonly used to describe the structure and distribution for biological communities, also the Shannon–Wiener index reflects the species richness and the relative abundance for species, but Pielou’s evenness measures how equally individuals are distributed in the recorded species.

Table 2. Diversity indices (species richness (S), Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′), and evenness of Pielou (J)) of plant species recorded across the studied stations

Station

Species Richness (S)

Shannon-Wiener Diversity Index (H′)

Evenness of Pielou (J)

St 1

8

1.94

0.93

St 2

6

1.73

0.97

St 3

9

2.01

0.91

St 4

8

1.87

0.90

St 5

7

1.85

0.95

St 6

10

2.05

0.89

St 7

11

2.12

0.88

St 8

11

2.17

0.91

St 9

12

2.31

0.93

St 10

11

2.29

0.95

St 11

10

2.03

0.88

St 12

11

2.10

0.88

St 13

9

2.01

0.93

St 14

7

1.82

0.93

St 15

8

1.89

0.91

St 16

5

1.49

0.93

St 17

6

1.66

0.93

Figure 2. Species richness (S), Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′), and Pielou’s (J) across the stations

Station 9 exhibited the highest diversity, while Station 16 showed the lowest diversity among all surveyed stations.

The results show noticeable variation in stations, the station 9 recorded the highest diversity (H′ = 2.31) and also high species richness, which indicating a more complex also balanced community structure that many species coexist in relatively similar abundances, also station 16 exhibited the lowest diversity (H′ = 1.49), that suggests lower species richness with the dominance for a few species, so resulting at a less diverse community, which differences may reflect local environmental conditions, and including soil characteristics, habitat heterogeneity, moisture availability, and levels for disturbance, that are known to influence species distribution also diversity patterns.

The evenness values (J) ranged from 0.88 to 0.97, indicating generally high evenness in stations, so these values explained that individuals are relatively well distributed in species, with no extreme dominance at most locations. Also, the slightly lower evenness values observed in some stations may indicate moderate dominance for certain species under specific environmental conditions.

When compared within the studies conducted at arid also semi-arid ecosystems, Shannon diversity values commonly range about 1.0 and 3.0, which depending with habitat complexity and environmental stress, because of that the diversity values recorded in the present study (H′ = 1.49–2.31) fall in the moderate diversity range typical for such environments, this is evident from the recording of 34 plant families that varied among annuals, perennials and shrubs (Table 3 and Figure 3).

Table 3. Floristic composition of the study area by family: numbers of genera and species, life-form composition, and representative species

No.

Family

No. of

Genera

No. of

Species

Life-Form Composition

Representative

Species

1

Amaranthaceae

8

11

Annual herbs (6), Perennial herbs (2), Shrubs (3)

Amaranthus albus, Suaeda aegyptiaca, Halothamnus iraqensis

2

Apiaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Ammi majus

3

Apocynaceae

1

1

Perennial herb (1)

Apocynum venetum

4

Asteraceae

13

15

Annual herbs (10), Perennial herbs (3), Shrubs (1), Biennial herbs (1)

Artemisia herba-alba, Silybum marianum, Senecio glaucus

5

Boraginaceae

5

5

Annual herbs (3), Perennial herbs (2)

Arnebia decumbens, Heliotropium bacciferum

6

Brassicaceae

7

8

Annual herbs (8)

Diplotaxis harra, Sinapis arvensis

7

Capparaceae

1

1

Perennial shrub (1)

Capparis spinosa

8

Convolvulaceae

1

2

Perennial herb (1), Shrub (1)

Convolvulus arvensis

9

Caryophyllaceae

4

5

Annual herbs (1), Perennial herbs/plants (4)

Herniaria hirsuta, Silene succulent

10

Cistaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Helianthemum salicifolium

11

Cleomaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Cleome glaucescens

12

Euphorbiaceae

2

3

Annual herbs (2), Perennial herb (1)

Euphorbia falcata, Ricinus communis

13

Fabaceae

8

10

Annual herbs (4), Perennial herbs (3), Shrubs/subshrubs (3)

Alhagi graecorum, Prosopis farcta, Trifolium resupinatum

14

Frankeniaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Frankenia pulverulenta

15

Gentianaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Centaurium tenuiflorum

16

Geraniaceae

1

2

Annual herbs (2)

Erodium glaucophyllum

17

Primulaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Lysimachia arvensis

18

Lamiaceae

3

3

Annual herbs (2), Subshrub (1)

Salvia spinosa, Teucrium polium

19

Lythraceae

1

1

Shrub/small tree (1)

Punica granatum

20

Plantaginaceae

1

3

Annual herbs (3)

Plantago lagopus, Plantago ovata

21

Papaveraceae

2

2

Annual herbs (2)

Fumaria parviflora

22

Malvaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Malva parviflora

23

Oxalidaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Oxalis corniculata

24

Resedaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Reseda arabica

25

Rubiaceae

2

2

Annual herbs (2)

Galium aparine

26

Rutaceae

1

1

Perennial herb/subshrub (1)

Haplophyllum tuberculatum

27

Polygonaceae

2

3

Annual herbs (3)

Rumex dentatus, Polygonum argyrocoleum

28

Salicaceae

2

3

Perennial trees (3)

Populus euphratica, Salix acmophylla

29

Solanaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Lycium barbarum

30

Tamaicaceae

1

3

Shrubs/small trees (3)

Tamarix aucheriana, Tamarix smyrnensis

31

Urticaceae

1

1

Annual herb (1)

Urtica urens

32

Zygophyllaceae

2

2

Annual herbs (2)

Fagonia glutinosa, Tribulus macropterus

33

Cyperaceae

1

2

Perennial herbs (2)

Cyperus rotundus

34

Poaceae

7

7

Annual grasses (6), Perennial grass (1)

Avena fatua, Cynodon dactylon, Enneapogon persicus

Previous studies indicate that in the lower parts of Iraq, the year is divided into two distinct seasons separated by short transitional periods: a long, hot, rainless summer (May to October) and a comparatively short, cool winter (December to February). In the lands, the summer season is shorter (June to September), while winter extends until March or April and is considerably longer than in the plains. The transitional seasons—spring (March and April) and autumn (November)—are less pronounced in the plains but remain distinguishable from the primary winter and summer seasons [30].

Figure 3. Life-form composition of the recorded flora in the study area

Figure 3 shows the distribution for plant types into three categories: Annual herbs: They represent the largest portion of the chart, approximately 60–65% of the total. Perennial herbs: They make up a moderate proportion, about 25–30%. And shrubs: They account for the smallest share, about 10–15%, so it indicates that annual herbs are the dominant plant type compared with perennial herbs and shrubs. This suggests that the studied area or environment favors plants that complete their life cycle within one year, but shrubs are less common.

Similarly, other studies confirm that the lower part of Iraq is characterized by two well-defined seasons with short transitional intervals: the extended hot, dry summer (May to October) and the relatively brief cool winter (December to February). In contrast, the highlands experience a shorter summer (June to September) and a longer winter lasting until March or April. The transitional seasons—spring (March and April) and autumn (November)—though less distinct in the plains, are still recognizable as intermediate periods between winter and summer [31]. This is also illustrated in Figure 4, which shows the maximum monthly temperatures from 2019 to 2023. Each group of bars represents one year (2019–2023), and within each group, twelve colored bars represent the months from January to December. Temperatures are lowest at the beginning and end of each year (winter months), rise during spring, and reach their highest levels in the middle of the year, particularly around June, July, and August (summer months). After summer, temperatures gradually decrease toward the end of the year. Overall, the chart shows a consistent seasonal pattern in all five years, with peak temperatures at summer and lower temperatures in winter.

Figure 4. Mean monthly maximum temperature at Karbala 2019–2023

Iraqi Meteorological Organization and Seismology

Figure 5 shows the average minimum temperatures of each month from 2019 to 2023, The highest minimum temperatures usually occur in December and January which ranging roughly between 6–12 degrees, temperatures gradually increase winter- summer Then gradually decrease from summer- winter, also the values are relatively consistent in the five years, with slight variations 2020 and 2021 appear to have slightly higher summer minimum temperatures when compared to the other years.

Figure 5. Average of minimum temperature in Karbala from 2019-2023

Iraqi Meteorological Organization and Seismology

The region experiences extremely high temperatures, particularly during summer, reaching up to 47 ℃, which results in elevated evaporation rates from both soil and vegetation. This is compounded by prolonged periods of low rainfall, leading to reduced groundwater levels and decreased soil moisture, thereby increasing susceptibility to erosion from seasonal winds. The Iraqi climate, especially in the southern regions, is characterized by hot summers and low winter precipitation, making it one of the driest areas in the region, Figure 6 showing sunshine levels in the month of 2019-2023, the horizontal axis (X-axis) represents the years: 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, while the vertical axis (Y-axis) shows the amount for sunshine (likely average hours per day or per month), so each year contains 12 colored bars, which representing the months January- December, so Sunshine is generally higher at the middle for the year (around June, July, and August), and lower sunshine levels appear in the beginning and end for the year (January, February, November, and December), some years (like 2019 and 2021) seem to have slightly higher peak sunshine which compared to 2020 and 2022, also it shows a clear seasonal pattern for sunshine, with the highest levels at summer months and the lowest at winter months, also only small differences between the years.

Figure 6. Average of sunshine in Karbala from 2019-2023

Iraqi Meteorological Organization and Seismology

High summer temperatures, combined with intense solar radiation, have adversely affected plant density and distribution in the study area, which exhibits characteristics typical of desert ecosystems. Long-term climatic stress has caused a significant decline in vegetation cover, rendering the region more vulnerable to wind erosion and sandstorms originating from nearby deserts. Wind plays a critical role in soil and plant water loss, as evaporation rates increase with higher wind speeds, which in turn are often associated with elevated temperatures, consistent with observations in Figure 7 which compares the amount for rainfall (in millimeters) across different months from 2019 to 2023 and the horizontal axis (X-axis) represents the years: 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, while the vertical axis (Y-axis) shows rainfall amounts, ranging 0-50 mm, so the different colored bars represent the different months (January to December), also 2019 had very high rainfall, especially at one month that reached about 45 mm., that is the highest value in the Figure, 2020 also shows noticeable rainfall, in some months around 20–25 mm., and 2021 and 2022 had relatively low rainfall when compared to other years, also 2023 shows moderate to high rainfall at some months, especially early at the year, Rainfall fluctuates from year to year, and the highest rainfall appears at 2019, but 2021 and 2022 seem to be the driest years in comparison.

Figure 7. Average of rainfall in Karbala from 2019 to 2023

Iraqi Meteorological Organization and Seismology

Recent decreases in seasonal rainfall, particularly during winter, have further contributed to a significant reduction in groundwater reserves, limiting plant growth and regeneration during spring and winter seasons. The soils in the study area exhibit considerable variability in their physical and chemical properties, reflecting differences in their general characteristics and affecting their overall composition (Figure 8). It shows the average monthly wind speeds of five years: 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, which each group of bars represents one year, and each colored bar in the group represents a different month (January-December), so the vertical axis shows the wind speed values (0-4), and the horizontal axis shows the years, 2019 had a very high wind speed at one month (around 3.8), that is the highest value on the chart, also 2022 and 2023 generally show moderate to high wind speeds when compared to other years, also 2021 and 2020 appear to have slightly lower wind speeds overall, and wind speed changes from month to month at every year.

Figure 8. Average of wind speed in Karbala from 2019-2023

Iraqi Meteorological Organization and Seismology

Although all the specimens stations are located in a relatively small geographic area, climatic factors such as temperature, rainfall, sunshine duration, and wind speed are of great importance in determining the vegetation pattern in the region. Climatic diagrams of the region.

Under these climatic conditions, the vegetation pattern in the region is greatly influenced by environmental stress factors, especially those related to water and high solar radiation. Some of the sampling stations may have relatively favorable microhabitat conditions compared with others. These may include slightly higher soil moisture content or lower wind exposure. These factors may have influenced the relatively high species richness found in Station 9, so Tables 3A–3D provide a comprehensive botanical inventory of the study area, documenting 106 plant species across multiple taxonomic families, along with their lifespans, local names, and spatial distribution across 17 specimens stations. The data show a clear dominance of annual herbaceous species, which constitute the majority of recorded species, demonstrating their adaptation to arid and semi-arid environmental conditions characterized by seasonal rainfall and ecological instability. Perennial grasses and shrubs are relatively less common but play a crucial role in maintaining vegetation structure and long-term ecosystem stability. Families such as Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Brassicaceae, and Amaranthaceae are well represented, reflecting their ecological diversity and tolerance to harsh conditions such as salinity and drought. The inclusion of local names reinforces ethnobotanical significance, while the distribution across stations highlights each species' habitat preferences and spatial diversity within the study area. Overall, these tables illustrate a diverse but stress-adapted plant community, shaped by environmental gradients and human influences, providing a valuable basis for environmental assessment, biodiversity conservation, and future vegetation studies.

On the other hand, some of the stations may have less favorable climatic conditions in the region. These may include high solar radiation, low soil moisture content, and high wind exposure. These factors may have influenced the relatively low species richness found in station 16.

The results have shown that climatic factors may have an indirect effect on the species richness in the region through factors related to soil moisture content and environmental stress factors. On the other hand, microhabitat factors may have an additional role in determining the pattern of species distribution in the sampling station [32].

There is an emphasis on annual herbs and stress-tolerant shrubs, which evidences obvious adaptation to arid conditions. The rapid completion of the life cycle of the annual forms of life in short favourable regimes is a typical survival strategy in the extremely seasonal rainfall regime and in the extreme heat of Iraq, and structural adaptations to save water during drought can be seen in perennial shrubs and deep-rooted taxa [26]. Localized damp microhabitats comprising woody riparian communities, including Populus euphratica and Salix acmophylla, also highlight the importance of the water availability and edaphic variation on community structure, a pattern also evident in riparian surveys in other parts of Iraq that possess the same taxa along water courses [32]. The special geology of the limestone and cave systems forms microhabitats that lack isolation and have high moisture retention in comparison with those of exposed plateaus. Most shade-tolerant and moisture-related species tend to be concentrated around the cave entrances and shady cliff bottoms, where the rate of evapotranspiration is reduced, whereas the annuals that are drought-tolerant can prevail in the exposed limestone scree and desert plains. This microtopographic effect on species turnover can be seen to be consistent with the larger vegetation patterns in semiarid landscapes where local refugia are higher than the surrounding harsh terrain.

Even though this study has made its contributions, it has some limitations. The survey was done in one year, and interannual weather variation can affect species occurrence and their abundance. Diversity measurement was based more on species richness and simple indices and did not quantitatively measure vegetation cover and biomass. Physicochemical properties of soil were not studied thoroughly at each station, but were only described, which made it difficult to directly relate the distribution of species to the parameters of the edaphic variable. The future studies must involve multi-year observations, the physical analysis of the soil, and the functional characteristics studies, as well as the remote images of the vegetation in response to climate change. Phytochemical and ecological research on significant and dominating species would further develop the ideas of adaptive and protective mechanisms of these species and their conservation importance.

4. Conclusion

The present study, based on plant collections from various sites around the Al-Tar Caves in Karbala, revealed significant variation in plant diversity across the area. Some locations exhibited high species richness, while others showed sparse vegetation. This variation is attributed to several factors, including harsh environmental conditions and the differential ability of certain plants to tolerate and adapt, enabling their survival and proliferation. A total of 106 plant species, representing 34 families, were documented. Among these, 97 species belonged to 32 dicotyledon families, with Asteraceae being the most diverse family in the study area. Additionally, 15 families were represented by only a single species in the riparian zones of Al-Tar Caves, including Apiaceae, Apocynaceae, Capparaceae, Cistaceae, Cleomaceae, Frankeniaceae, Gentianaceae, Lythraceae, Malvaceae, Primulaceae, Rutaceae, Resedaceae, Oxalidaceae, Solanaceae, and Urticaceae. The survey addresses a research gap in knowledge, which is that no previous specific floristic examination had been carried out in this limestone and cave-related scenery. A number of ecologically and medicinally important species were documented, which emphasized conservation importance. The findings highlight the necessity of preserving the habitat, conducting ecological studies over an extended period, and conducting additional taxonomic and phytochemical studies in the area.

Acknowledgment

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Iraq Natural History Research Center and Museum, University of Baghdad, Iraq, for their invaluable assistance in conducting this research.

Appendix

Table 3A. Floristic composition of the study area: Families, species, life duration, local names, and sampling stations (1-33)

No.

Family

Species

Duration

Local Names

Station

1

Amaranthaceae

Amaranthus albus L.

Annual herb

White pigweed

St 2, St 10

2

Atriplex hastata Geners. ex Steud

Annual herb

Hastate orache

St 4, St 2

3

Anabasis setifera Moq.

Perennial herb

Anabasis

St 3

4

Beta maritima L.

Perennial herb

Sea Beet

St 6

5

Halothamnus iraqensis var. hispidulus Botsch

Perennial shrub

Saltbush

St 11, St 15, St 17

6

Caroxylon jordanicola (Eig) Akhani & Roalson

Perennial shrub

Kanna bush

St 15

7

Cornulaca monacantha Delile

Perennial shrub

Had a djouri

St 10, St 16

8

Salsola kali L.

Annual herb

Windwitch

St12, St13

9

Soda inermis (Moench) Fourr.

Annual herb

almyra

St 5

10

Suaeda aegyptiaca (Hasselq.) Zohary

Annual herb

Tartai, Shuatan

St 1, St 5

11

Suaeda vermiculata Forssk. ex J.F.Gmel.

Annual herb

Juliman

St 3, St 12, St 14

12

Apiaceae

Ammi majus L.

Annual herb

Bishop's Weed

St 2, St 9, St10, St 11, St 14

13

Apocynaceae

Apoacynum venetum (L.) Mavrodiev, Laktionov & Yu.E.Alexeev

Perennial herb

Sword-leaf dogbane

St 1, St 7,

14

Asteraceae

Artemisia herba-alba Asso

Shrub

White wormwood

St 14

15

Calendula tripterocarpa Rupr.

Annual herb

Winged-fruited marigold

St13, St16

16

Carduus getulus Pomel

Annual herb

Western Negev

St 5, St9,

17

Centaurea sinaica DC.

Perennial herb

murrar

St 2, St 17

18

Hedypnois cretica (L.) Dum.Cours

Annual herb

Scaly hawkbit

St 4

19

Launaea angustifolia (Desf.) Kuntze

Annual herb

Bitter Lettuce

St 6

20

Launaea nudicaulis (L.) Hook.fil.

Perennial herb

bold-leaf launaea

St 8

21

Leontodon laciniatus (Bertol.) Widder

Annual herb

hawkbits

St 3

22

Picris babylonica Hand-Mazz.

Annual herb

Rough Hawkbit

St 17

23

Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth

Perennial herb

Coustelline

St15

24

Senecio glaucus L.

Annual herb

Jaffa groundsel

St 8, St 13

25

Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.

Biennial herb

blessed milkthistle

St1, St8

26

Taraxacum monochlamydeum Hand-Mazz.

Perennial herb

Ingle-flowered dandelion

St10, St11

27

Sonchus tenerrimus L.

Annual herb

Slender sow thistle

St 2, St 3, St 12

28

Xanthium strumarium L.

Annual herb

Hasach, lizzaij

St 3

29

Boraginaceae

Arnebia decumbens (Vent.) Coss. & Kralik

Annual herb

Shajaret el arneb

St 13

30

Arnebia hispidissima (Lehm.) DC., b

Perennial herb

Hasheshat al arnab

St16

31

Gastrocotyle hispida (Forssk.) Bunge

Annual herb

Hairy Bugloss

St 4

32

Heliotropium bacciferum Forssk.

Perennial herb

Monkey tail

St 6

33

Lappula spinocarpos (Forssk.) Asch.

Annual herb

Bluebur

St 9, St 15

St: Station

Table 3B. Floristic composition of the study area: Families, species, life duration, local names, and sampling stations (34-64)

No.

Families

Species

Duration

Local Names

Stations

34

Brassicaceae

Alyssum linifolium Stephan

Annual herb

Flaxleaf Alyssum

St 7

35

Cardaria draba (L.) Desv.

Annual herb

Whitetop

St 10, St 12

36

Carrichtera annua (L.) DC.

Annual herb

Ward's weed

St 7

37

Diplotaxis acris (Forssk.) Boiss.

Annual herb

White rocket

St 6, St 8

38

Diplotaxis harra (Forssk.) Boiss.

Annual herb

Sand Rocket,

St 2, St 5, St 11

39

Farsetia aegyptiaca Turra

Annual herb

Shiqara, Shikara

St 15

40

Sinapis arvensis L.

Annual herb

Wild mustard

St 7

41

Sisymbrium irio L.

Annual herb

London Rockets

St 1, St 4, St 7, St 15

42

Capparaceae

Capparis spinose L.

Perennial plant

Caper bush

St 7, St 8

43

Convolvulaceae

Convolvulus arvensis L.

Perennial herb

Morning glory,

St 4, St 6, St 10

44

Convolvulus oxyphyllus Boiss.

shrub

Bindweed

St 12

45

Caryophyllaceae

Herniaria hemistemon J.Gay

Perennial plant

Half-leaved Rock-rose

St 8

46

Gypsophila heteropoda Freyn & Sint.

Perennial plant

Baby's Breath

St 15

47

Herniaria hirsuta L.

Perennial herb

Hairy rupturewort.

St 7

48

Paronychia arabica (L.) DC.

Annual herb

Whitlow

St 9

49

Silene succulenta Forssk.

Perennial plant

Silène charnue - Succulent catchfly

St 11

50

Cistaceae

Helianthemum salicifolium (L.) Mill.

Annual herb

Willowleaf Frostweed

St 14

51

Cleomaceae

Cleome glaucescens DC.

Annual herb

Spider Flower

St 13

52

Euphorbiaceae

Euphorbia falcata L.

Annual herb

Spurge

St 5, St 13

53

Euphorbia peplus L.

Annual plant

Radium weed

St 3, St 8, St 16

54

Ricinus communis L.

Perennial herb

Castor oil plant

St 17

55

Fabaceae

Alhagi graecorum Boiss.

Perennial shrub

Manna tree

St 1, St 3, St 12, St 16

56

Astragalus spinosus (Forssk.) Muschl.

Shrub

Shadad

St 12

57

Hippocrepis areolata Desv.

Perennial plant

Horseshoe Vetch

St 6

58

Lathyrus odoratus L.

Annual herb

Sweet pea

St 14

59

Onobrychis ptolemaica (Delile) DC.

Perennial herb

Single-cut Sainfoin.

St 12, St 15

60

Prosopis farcta (Banks & Sol.) J. F.Macbr.

Subshrub or shrub

Syrian mesquite

St 1, St 5, St 12

61

Trifolium resupinatum L.

Annual herb

Reversed clover

St 11, St 16

62

Lotus corniculatus L.

Annual herb

bird's-foot trefoil

St 11

63

Medicago laciniata (L.) Mill.

Perennial herb

Cut leaf medick

St 6

64

Melilotus indicus (L.) All.

Annual herb

Sweet clover

St 5, St 6

Table 3C. Floristic composition of the study area: Families, species, life duration, local names, and sampling stations (65-87)

No.

Families

Species

Duration

Local Names

Stations

65

Frankeniaceae

Frankenia pulverulenta L.

Annual herb

European sea-heath wisp-weed.

St 9

66

Gentianaceae

Centaurium tenuiflorum (Hoffmanns. & Link) Fritsch

Annual herb

Slender centaury

St 10

67

Geraniaceae

Erodium glaucophyllum (L.) L'Hér.

Annual herb

Stork's-bill,

St 3

68

Erodium laciniatum (Cav.) Willd.

Annual herb

Cutleaf stork's bill

St 6

69

Primulaceae

Lysimachia arvensis subsp. arvensis

Annual herb

Scarlet pimpernel

St 9

70

Lamiaceae

Mentha longifolia (L.) L.

Annual herb

Horse mint

St 4

71

Salvia spinosa L.

Annual herb

Spiny-calyxed Sage

St 3, St 7

72

Teucrium polium L.

Sub-shrub

Felty germander

St 9

73

Lythraceae

Punica granatum L.

Shrub or small tree

Pomegranate

St 8

74

Plantaginaceae

Plantago lagopus L.

Annual herb

Hare-foot plantain

St 9, St 10

75

Plantago afra L.

Annual herb

Glandular plantain

St 4, St 10

76

Plantago ovata Forssk.

Annual herb

Blond plantain

St 5

77

Papaveraceae

Fumaria parviflora Lam.

Annual herb

Fine-leaf fumitory

St 9

78

Hypecoum pendulum L.

Annual herb

Hypécoum pendant

St 11

79

Malvaceae

Malva parviflora L.

Annual herb

cheeseweed,

St 13

80

Oxalidaceae

Oxalis corniculata L.

Annual herb

Yellow Wood Sorrel,

St 12

81

Resedaceae

Reseda arabica Boiss.

Annual herb

Love flower,

St 7

82

Rubiaceae

Crucianella membranacea Boiss.

Annual herb

Crossworts

St 8

83

Galium aparine L.

Annual herb

Bedstraw

St 9

84

Rutaceae

Haplophyllum tuberculatum (Forssk.) A.Juss.

Perennial or subshrub

Oblongleaf Rock-rose

St 17

85

Polygonaceae

Rumex spinosus L.

Annual herb

Devil's thorn

St10

86

Polygonum argyrocoleum Steud. ex-Kunze

Annual herb

Silver-sheath knotweed

St 13

87

Rumex dentatus L.

Annual herb

Toothed dock

St 5, St 7

Table 3D. Floristic composition of the study area: Families, species, life duration, local names, and sampling stations (88-106)

No.

Families

Species

Duration

Local Names

Stations

88

Salicaceae

Populus alba L.

Perennial tree

White poplar

St 15

89

Populus euphratica Olivier.

Perennial tree

Desert poplar,

St 9

90

Salix acmophylla Boiss.

Perennial tree

Brook willow

St 8

91

Solanaceae

Lycium barbarum L.

Annual herb

Matrimony vine

St 6, St 9

92

Tamaricaceae

Tamarix aucheriana (Decne. ex Walp.) B.R.Baum.

Shrub or a small tree

Salt Cedar

St 3, St 14

93

Tamarix brachystachys Bunge.

Shrub or a small tree

Athel tamarisk

St 8, St 9

94

Tamarix smyrnensis Bunge.

Shrub or a small tree

Tarfa

St 10, St 11

95

Urticaceae

Urtica urens L.

Annual herb

Annual nettle,

St 1, St 13

96

Zygophyllaceae

Fagonia glutinosa Delile

Annual herb

Dereima

St 15

97

Tribulus macropterus Boiss.

Annual herb

Bullhead

St 4

98

Cyperaceae

Cyperus rotundus L.

Perennial herb

Nut Grass,

St 7

99

Cyperus corymbosus Rottb

Perennial herb

Kok san suea

St 8

100

Poaceae

Eremopyrum bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski

Annual herb

Taper-tipped wheat

St 1

101

Avena fatua L.

Annual herb

Wild oat

St 6

102

Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.

Annual herb

Bermuda Grass

St 17

103

Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd.

Annual herb

Crowfootgrass,

St 14

104

Poa annua L.

Annual grass

Simply poa

St 13

105

Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.

Annual grass

Hairy crabgrass

St 12

106

Enneapogon persicus Boiss.

Perennial grass

Persian Pappus-Grass

St 11

  References

[1] Abdul-Razaq, M.I. (2023). The groundwater balance assessment in Holy Karbala, central Iraq. Iraqi Geological Journal, 56(2D): 234-244. https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.56.2D.18ms-2023-10-24 

[2] Al Waeli, A.M.T., Al-Azawi, F.W., Hamid, H.M. (2024). Evaluation of the sensitivity of Al-Husseiniya soils in Karbala to erosion using Landsat sensors. Environmental Challenges, 14: 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.100857 

[3] Al-Shakeri, A.J., Abdul-Qader, S.Z., Jasim, H.K. (2017). Tar Al-Sayed area suitability as a geopark. In Abstracts of the 70th Geological Congress of Turkey, p. 619. https://www.jmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/243955f3d88672b_ek.pdf.

[4] Jalil, S.J., Kateeb, A.I.A., Al-Juboory, H.H. (2025). Investigation of macrofungi in the middle of Iraq. Bulletin of the Iraq Natural History Museum, 18(3): 665-687. https://doi.org/10.26842/binhm.7.2025.18.3.0665

[5] Al-Ashbal, H.N., Al-Joboury, K.R., Jalil, S.J. (2025). Insects infestation for plants of Fabaceae in different areas in Iraq. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1449(1): 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1449/1/012057

[6] Khalaf, I.M., Hameed, A.T., Talak, A.O., Nasir, K.M. (2024). Phytoremediation of the heavy metals copper, lead, cadmium, nickel and cobalt using some plant species of the Asteraceae family. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(2): 1019-1032. https://doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2024.184465

[7] Hameed, A.T., Al-alh, N.M.A., Jumaa, A.W. (2021). Antioxidant activity and phytominerals study of some Asteraceae species growth in western Iraq. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(1): 2239-2245. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13736

[8] Hamad, S.H., Nasir, K.M., Hameed, A.T., Eskander, G. (2024). Resveratrol inhibits cell cycle dynamics, caspase activation, and programmed cell death: Implications for cancer treatment in MCF-7 cells. Egyptian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 55(6): 1659-1668. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejvs.2024.263893.1787

[9] Mora, C., Tittensor, D.P., Adl, S., Simpson, A.G.B., Worm, B. (2011). How many species are there on Earth and in the Ocean? PLoS Biology, 9(8): e1001127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127

[10] Noy-Meir, I. (1973). Desert ecosystems: Environment and producers. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000325

[11] Al-Joboury, K.R., Al-Dabbas, M.A. (2023). Geological and plant diversity in selected areas of Al Tib, Maysan, Iraq. Revis Bionatura, 8(3): 106. https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2023.08.03.106

[12] Muslih, K.D. (2014). Identifying the climatic conditions in Iraq by tracking cooling events in the North Atlantic Ocean during 3000–0 BC. Miscellanea Geographica, 18(3): 40-46. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0016

[13] Shubbar, R.M., Salman, H.H., Lee, D.I. (2017). Characteristics of climate variation indices in Iraq using a statistical factor analysis. International Journal of Climatology, 37(2): 918-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4749

[14] Ali, A.H., Marghany, M.R., Atito, E., Barutçular, C., Kamel, N.M., Ahmed, M.M., El-Sayed, M.A. (2022). Desert plant seed morphology and germination strategy. International Journal of Conservation Science, 13(4): 1249-1260. https://ijcs.ro/public/IJCS-22-91_Ali.pdf. 

[15] Ghazanfar, S., Edmondson, J., Hind, D.J.N. (2020). Flora of Iraq. Vol 6: Compositae. ‎Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338107989_Flora_of_Iraq_Volume_6_Compositae.

[16] Ismaeel, Z.A.L. (2022). Comparative anatomical study for some wild species belonging to Amaranthaceae and Compositae in Iraq. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 15(3): 1737-1743. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2512

[17] A., S.A., A., L.G., Al-Newani, H.R.H. (2023). Comparative taxonomical study for reproductive parts of eight species belonging to Brassicaceae family in Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 54(1): 25-31. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v54i1.1673

[18] Hameed, A.T., Dawd, S.M., Al Bahadly, Z.K. (2021). Ecological study and peroxidase activity of some medical plants (Asteraceae) growing wildly in Anbar Governorate – Iraq. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1818(1): 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1818/1/012037

[19] Qader, A.H.A., Hasan, H.H., Hameed, A.T., Houmady, H.Y. (2024). Heavy metal accumulation and phytochemical profiling of Brassicaceae and Amaranthaceae for phytoremediation and medicinal applications. Integrative Biomedical Research, 8(3): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.25163/angiotherapy.839498

[20] Al-Joboury, K.R., Wannas, A.K. (2025). Survey of plants for Brenaj, Wasit, Iraq. Journal of Bioscience and Applied Research, 11(4): 1199-1209.‏ https://doi.org/10.21608/jbaar.2025.468379

[21] Al-Kubaisi, A.A., Hameed, A.T., Al-Issawi, M.H. (2025). Comparative anatomical study of Chenopodiastrum murale (L.) S. Fuentes in different regions of Al-Anbar Governorate: Stem and epidermal variations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1538(1): 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1538/1/012055

[22] Kadereit, G., Borsch, T., Weising, K., Freitag, H. (2003). Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164(6): 959-986. https://doi.org/10.1086/378649

[23] Hamood, K., Hameed, A.T., Azzam, M.R., Mohammed, I.H. (2022). Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of the flavonoids Ammi majus L. growing broadly in western Iraq. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2547: 020012. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112686

[24] Al-Joboury, K.R., Zurgany, L.M. (2024). Investigation of wildland plants of the riparian area of the Dujail River, Salahaldin province, north of Baghdad, Iraq. Bulletin of the Iraq Natural History Museum, 18(2): 315-356. https://doi.org/10.26842/binhm.7.2024.18.2.0315

[25] Ghazanfar, S.A., McDaniel, T. (2016). Floras of the Middle East: A quantitative analysis and biogeography of the flora of Iraq. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 73(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428615000244

[26] Othman, O.M., Al-Kasiy, A.M.A., Al-Hazemawi, A.K.H., Shahatha, S.S., Abood, N.M., Mousa, M.O. (2025). Increasing wild plant species in the western desert district of Iraq. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 23(1): 596-613. https://doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2025.187543

[27] Hadinejad, M., Naghipour, A.A., Ebrahimi, A., Naimi, B. (2025). Modeling the effect of climate change on the distribution of plant communities in Zayandeh-Rud basin, Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197: 479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-13861-6

[28] Boussakouran, A., El Yamani, M., Sakar, E.H., Rharrabti, Y. (2024). Trend in yield and protein content relationship in a historical series of durum wheat varieties under rainfed and irrigated environments. Crop and Environment, 3(3): 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crope.2024.05.001 

[29] Muslih, K.D., Abbas, A.M. (2024). Climate of Iraq. In The Geography of Iraq. World Regional Geography Book Series, pp. 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71356-9_2

[30] Muhammad, S.A., Al-Dabba, M.A. (2022). Climatic water balance comparison for selected areas in the middle of Iraq. Iraqi Journal of Science, 63(10): 4328-4341. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2022.63.10.19

[31] Atrena, A., Banelytė, G.G., Bruun, H.H., Goldberg, I., Rahbek, C., Heilmann-Clausen, J. (2024). Plant communities and their relations to habitat and microhabitat features along a management gradient in beech forests in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management, 569: 122162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122162

[32] Al-Joboury, K.R. (2020). Taxonomical study for the species Volkameria inermis L. (Lamiaceae). Plant Archives, 20(1): 2550-2552.‏