Reduction in the Emission Rate of Greenhouse Gases and the Increase in Crop Production by Using Compost on Marginal Land

Reduction in the Emission Rate of Greenhouse Gases and the Increase in Crop Production by Using Compost on Marginal Land

IsrunUswah Hasanah Syamsuddin Laude Muhammad Basir-Cyio Fadhliah Effendy 

Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu 94118, Indonesia

Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Tadulako University, Palu 94118, Indonesia

Department of Agriculture Economics, Agriculture Faculty of Tadulako University, Palu 94118, Indonesia

Corresponding Author Email: 
isrun.isrun@yahoo.com
Page: 
583-591
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.160513
Received: 
8 July 2021
|
Revised: 
24 August 2021
|
Accepted: 
3 September 2021
|
Available online: 
29 October 2021
| Citation

© 2021 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Greenhouse gases dominated by CO2, CH4, CFC, and N2O come from human (anthropogenic) activities. Efforts to increase the production of rice and corn crops require organic and inorganic fertilizers. The use of chemical fertilizers, which can increase greenhouse gas emissions, is higher than that of organic fertilizers. This study aimed to investigate the reduction in the greenhouse gas emission rate and the increase in crop production caused by organic fertilizer from rice straw and cocoa peel, a community-based sustainable development approach based on education. This research used the mixed method, a descriptive and simple experimental design with the following treatments: t0 = without Compost; ta = straw rice compost dosage of 3 t ha-1; tb = cocoa pod husk dosage of 3 t ha-1; Bta = maize crops + without compost (t0); Btb = maize crops + cocoa pod husk compost (tb); Sta = bare soil + without compost (t0); Stb = rice crops + straw compost (ta); Stc = rice crops + cocoa pod husk compost (tb); and Std = rice crops + without compost (t0). The application of compost reduced agricultural waste and greenhouse gas emissions of CH4 and N2O in both maize and rice fields. Greenhouse gas emissions were reduced by 30 percent compared to those under the application of chemical fertilizers. The utilization of compost as organic fertilizer also increased the production of corn and rice crops compared to that without the application of agricultural waste up to 10.3 tons per ha.

Keywords: 

greenhouse gases, emission, agricultural production, straw rice compost, cocoa pod husk

1. Introduction

The role of the agricultural sector is to produce food for the entire population of a country, which is especially challenging for countries with a large population. Based on the results of the 2017 population census, Indonesia, which has 262 million people, requires the availability of sustainable food so that community needs can be fulfilled. Indonesia’s growing population continues to increase, making it the fourth most populous country after China, India and the United States. Due to population growth, the amount of food demand is getting bigger and bigger [1]. The loss of food production capacity and the loss of soil fertility will become increasingly serious problems. To support food security, it is necessary to develop strategies in the field of food through the improvement of agricultural practices on paddy fields and corn crops on dry land with organic fertilizer from agricultural waste. This process is very beneficial since it improves the soil both physically and chemically. However, high utilization of agricultural waste with carbon and nitrogen contents can be a source of greenhouse gases, especially methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), which increases global warming [2, 3]. Agriculture as a source of CH4 and N2O emissions is a topic that has been studied by many countries, mainly developed countries in Europe and the United States. N2O emissions from synthetic fertilizers and CH4 emissions from fermented materials stimulate carbon accumulation in soil [4].

Soil inundation under reductive conditions stimulates decomposition and methanogenic microorganisms to become more active so that CH4 gas synthesis in the rhizosphere also increases [5, 6]. Agricultural waste such as straw and cocoa pod husk is the primary choice for rice and cocoa production in Central Sulawesi and addresses the limited availability of fertilizer in Indonesia. The average rice production in Indonesia 2010-2016 reached 432 thousand tons, mainly in Palu Valley, indicating the potential for the production of straw waste that can be utilized as organic fertilizer [7, 8]. Technically, the use of rice straw as an organic fertilizer has been considered unfavorable when it is immersed directly into rice fields, stimulating greenhouse gas emissions, mainly CH4, in stagnant conditions because of its high C/N ratio [9].

The use of agricultural waste is part of the effort to utilize local resources in accordance with the principle of sustainable development, which is considered integral to social, economic, and environmental health [10]. These three strategic components have their own challenges, although they cannot be separated, with the social, economic and environmental systems involved in the provision of human needs [11].

Education is one of the crucial processes that is expected to build a framework for the success of sustainable development [12, 13]. Since 2005, the United Nations (UN) has declared the “Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, 2005-2014”, which has the purpose of empowering people to utilize existing resources, including agricultural wastes, that can be processed into organic fertilizer in the form of compost [14]. The amount of agricultural waste that can provide a source of organic fertilizer is very abundant; in Java, this waste has been applied as organic fertilizer, mainly in Northern Coast (Pantura) regions, although the handling process is not in accordance with expectations. For the Sulawesi region, agricultural waste material in the form of rice straw and cocoa pod husk has not been widely used.

Central Sulawesi cocoa bean production reached 149.5 thousand tons in 2014, which can potentially produce cocoa pod husk waste. Similarly, large areas of rice crops produce many plant residues (straw); if the straw is not properly handled, it potentially becomes waste. Conversely, if it is handled properly as raw material for organic fertilizer through a variety of scientifically informed processes then it can be developed and used by the community itself, a process empowered through informal education.

In contrast to the description above, the study of agricultural waste utilization as a raw material for compost-based organic fertilizer is an effort to reduce the rate of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from paddy fields and dry lands and increase the quality of marginal land to support sustainable food security and environmentally friendliness, as one aspect of the Education for Sustainable Development mission.

2. Materials and Methods

The data and information collection used integrated methods, namely, the descriptive method, simple experimental design, and survey method. To identify the nutrient content of each agricultural waste, laboratory tests were conducted at the Environmental Laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University. Human Ecosystem Analysis--HESA was used to determine the involvement of the farmer community [15] in the process of making compost from agricultural waste and how to use it.

The soil fertility and greenhouse gas emissions were measured from wet and dry lands using standardized testing methods that have been applied for both soil and gas analyses. Specifically, the analysis of CH4 and N2O greenhouse gas emissions was conducted in the Laboratory of Greenhouse Gases of Agriculture Research (Lolittan), Jekanan, Pati, Central Java in cooperation with the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).

The study started from June to September 2019 and continued by field implementation monitoring in 2020 at three locations in Palu Valley of Central Sulawesi Province. To determine the nutrients, compost was analyzed in the Laboratory of the Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, while the treatment of rice straw compost was conducted on marginal land with alkaline soil. Straw and cocoa pod husk compost treatments were conducted in the area of corn fields in the Sigi Biromaru subistrict, Sigi District.

The field data required for the purposes of interpretation (justification) were acquired through the prepared treatments as follows:

  • t0 = without compost;      
  • ta = straw rice compost dosage of 3 t ha-1;
  • tb = cocoa pod husk dosage of 3 t ha-1;
  • Bta = maize crops + without compost (t0);
  • Btb = maize crops + cocoa pod husk compost (tb);
  • Sta = bare soil + without compost (t0);
  • Stb = rice crops + straw compost (ta);
  • Stc = rice crops + cocoa pod husk compost (tb);
  • Std = rice crops + without compost (t0).

CH4 and N2O gas emission data were collected in the form of time series to see the cross-treatment emission rate and not the cross-section. To determine the effect of rice straw and cocoa pod husk application on the nutrient release rate, pH, KTK, N, P, K, Ca, S, Mg, and Na were measured.

Data collection was conducted one week after compost treatment or two weeks after transplanting (WAT). To collect the gas samples in the rice fields, a flux collecting box was used, which was coupled with a plastic syringe with a volume of 5 ml. CH4 and N2O emission rates were calculated by using the mathematical approach proposed by Rolston [16-18] as follows:

$F=\left(\frac{V}{A}\right)\left(\frac{\Delta C}{\Delta t}\right)$             (1)

where,

F    =   CH4 and N2O gas emission rates (mg m-2 h-1),

V    =   emission box container volume (m3),

A    =   large box (m2),

ΔC =   concentration difference of t1-to (mg m-3/ppm),

Δt   =   gas collecting period (h).

The analyzed soil characteristics in the test location included soil acidity (pH), exchangeable bases (Ca, Mg, K and Na), cation exchange capacity (CEC), base saturation (BS), available P, total N, available K, and organic C contents. The results of the soil analysis before the experiments for the dry land/mixed gardens indicated a pH (H2O) of 6.4-6.8, and it was categorized as slightly acidic to neutral; for the rice field soil, it was categorized as slightly acidic to acidic (5.5-5.7). The contents of soil C-organic and N-total in both the mixed garden and rice field were generally low, and P2O5 and K2O ranged from very low to low. Other soil characteristics examined were the cation exchange capacity (CEC), base saturation (BS) and exchangeable bases, which are presented in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Nutrient contents of cocoa pods and rice straw

The results of the nutrient content analysis of the organic fertilizers made from cocoa pod husk and rice straw are presented in Table 2.

The data in Table 2 show that the nitrogen content (N) in rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost exceeded the critical values of the compost, so it was easily mineralized. According to Khan [19], mineralization in compost occurs when the N content is above the N-critical value, which is between 1.5% and 2.5%. Enzai and Ata [20, 21] emphasized that the critical value of nitrogen (N) of compost ranges from 1.9% to 1.1%; when the value is below that critical point, immobilization may occur.

Table 1. Soil characteristic analysis of dry land/mixed garden (KC) and rice field (SW) sites

Sample Code

pH (1:2.5)

C Organic (%)

C Total (%)

N Total (%)

C/N

HCl 25% mg/100g (HCl 25%)

K2O 25% mg/100g (HCl 25%)

H2O

KCl

KC1

6.6

5.5

1.13

1.5

0.11

13.64

14.39

57.44

KC2

6.4

5.3

1.25

1.66

0.13

12.92

26.98

16.56

                 

KC3

6.6

5.7

1.01

1.35

0.15

6.96

16.43

12.76

                 

SW1

5.5

4.4

2.74

3.65

0.29

12.58

14.44

49.79

                 

SW2

5.5

4.3

1.54

2.05

0.17

12.08

20.46

10.54

SW3

5.7

4.6

2.2

3.05

0.27

12.7

20.73

11.27

Sample Code

P2O5 ppm (Bray-l)

Exchangeble Bases (me/100g Soil)

CEC me%

BS me%

Al-Ex me%

Ca

Mg

K

Na

KC1

8.13

3.39

0.88

1.01

0.2

7.5

73.07

0.37

KC2

16.98

5.1

1.09

0.54

0.27

8.4

83.33

0.32

             

145.4

 

KC3

14.67

7.91

1.32

0.32

0.24

6.73

0

0.26

             

127.6

 

SW1

8.16

18.3

3.85

0.87

0.21

18.24

1

0.5

             

118.6

 

SW2

16.22

9.01

2.11

0.87

0.19

10.27

4

0.52

SW3

13.97

11.3

2.18

0.2

0.21

15.25

91.16

0.51

Source: Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University

Table 2. Chemical composition of cocoa pod husk and rice straw composts

Number

Compost Type

Content (%)

C-org

N-total

P

K

C/N Ratio

1.

2.

Cocoa pod husk

Rice straw

41.79

43.08

4.59

4.60

0.019

0.021

0.20

0.20

9.10

9.37

Source: Laboratory of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, 2019

Table 3. Average dry land content of C-organic, N-total, P and K-available in soil

 

Location

Treatment

Without Compost (T0)

Rice Straw (Ta)

Cocoa Pod Husk (Tb)

 

 

Dry Land

 

 

C-organic (%)

1.81 a

2.17 b

2.11 b

N-total (%)

0.19 a

0.39 b

0.32 b

P-available (mg kg-1 P2O5)

12.3 a

19.18 b

18.53 b

K-available (me/100 g)

0.17 a

0.22b

0.20b

 

 

Rice Field

 

 

 

C-organic (%)

2.01 a

2.53 b

2.44 b

N-total (%)

0.20 a

0.36 b

0.33 b

P-available (mg kg-1 P2O5)

14.7 a

19.32 b

19.16 b

K-available (me/100 g)

0.19 a

0.26 b

0.23 b

Note: Lowercase letters in the same line indicate similarity with an HSD test = 0.05

3.2 Soil C-organic, N-total, P and K-available

The experimental results showed that the treatment with rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost could increase the C-organic, N-total, P and K-available in soil (Table 3).

Table 3 shows the treatment given was significantly different from the control. All observed response variables obtained the highest values under rice straw compost application for both rice and maize crops but were not significantly different from cocoa pod husk compost application. This is in accordance with the findings of Mahmoud et al. [22] which showed that the application of rice straw and animal wastes could increase the C-organic, N-total, P and K-available in soil. The application of compost increased the soil C-organic, N-total and P available contents. C-organic increased from the low to moderate category, which was in the range of 1.81% to 2.17% on dry land and 2.01% to 2.53% on rice fields. The same also applied to N-total and K-available, but not P-available, for which there was a marked increase in the control even though the overall level was low. Compost increased the N-total in soil with the addition of organic compounds that can produce organic acids. When amino acids undergo hydrolysis, they produce ammonium (NH4+) or nitrate (NO3-), making them available to crops. According to Huang [23], nitrogen-containing compounds produce ammonium, the first N- form derived from the decomposition of proteins through enzymatic processes assisted by heterotrophs. Ammonium is further converted into nitrate by microorganisms or plants.

3.3 CH4 greenhouse gas emissions

The emission rate of methane (CH4) tended to follow the growth pattern of plants; at the beginning of the growth, it tended to increase, and at 56-days-old, approximately 6 weeks after transplanting (MSTp), the rice crop showed the highest emissions, which then tended to decline after the primordial stage. The methane emissions under the rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost treatments were lower than those in soils without treatment, both in fields with crops and without crops, as illustrated in Figure 1.

The high cumulative emissions of CH4 in rice fields without compost is an indicator of a high carbon source, which stimulates methane emissions in rice fields without straw compost or cocoa pod husk compost. The low methane emissions in the composted field are the result of the low C/N ratio of the organic matter undergoing mineralization processes. According to Jimenez and Xiong [24, 25], further mineralization of organic matter will minimize the formation and emissions of methane gas into the atmosphere. Bare soil had higher emission rates, similar to rice fields with crops but without compost. The higher emission trends under both conditions were due to the presence of remaining straw from the previous harvest season, which was partly decomposed, in addition to the habit of farmers to allow the straw to remain stacked without burning the straw or moving it to other places.

The average methane emissions during the rice cultivation period under the four soil conditions are presented in Table 4.

The average methane emissions during the rice cultivation period under the four soil conditions (Table 4) were highest in bare soil (0.6723 mg M-2 hour-1) and the lowest was in flooded rice fields with crops and straw compost during plant growth, i.e., 0.1430 mg M-2 Hour-1.

In rice fields, methane production and emissions are affected by the availability of substrates for methanogenic bacteria through litterfall production and root exudates that contain many carbohydrates and amino acids [26]. This position is supported by Khosa, Sidhu, and Benbi [27], who found that methane emissions from rice fields depend on anaerobic conditions, types of plants, and the application of organic matter.

The pattern of methane gas emissions between irrigated rice fields and dry land is basically the same; however, dry land with maize crops had a lower emission level, including total accumulation during the growth period of maize plants (Figure 2). The application of cocoa pod husk compost can reduce the rate and level of methane gas emissions more than those without cocoa pod husk compost.

Table 4 shows that the average rate of methane gas emissions in the composted corn field was only -0.1283 mg M-2 hour-1. This negative emission of methane gas proves that the amount emitted from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere is far less than the amount of methane consumed by microorganisms. Research on the microbial consortia consuming methane is still limited, but Demirtepe [28] mentions that marine sediments under anaerobic conditions are believed to contain methane-consuming microbes as long as sulphate is available as the electron acceptor and methane is converted as an energy source.

In maize fields without cocoa pod husk compost, the emissions tended to be higher, that is, 0.034495 mg M-2 hour-1. This result indicates that even without the addition of organic matter to the maize field, the emissions remained higher than those in the composted maize fields. The release of organic compounds containing carboxyl groups via root exudation is suspected to stimulate methane gas emissions, so on dry land without cocoa pod husk compost, the emissions appeared higher than on lands with compost.

Root exudates potentially promote the formation and emission of methane gas into the atmosphere, which will increase when supported by methane-forming microorganisms. In addition, although the methane emission rates on dry land tend to increase as plants age, the rate of increase remains lower than that in irrigated rice fields. On dry land, soil temperatures are commonly higher than in wetlands (anaerobic soil), so the process of methane assimilation and the formation of methane gas is slower. The rate of oxidation and assimilation of methane in soil increases as soil temperatures increase from 5 to 20℃ but decreases as temperatures increase from 20 to 30℃ [29]. The soil temperature at the research location outside the mulch was approximately 35 to 37℃, whereas that inside the mulch reached 41℃ (Table 5).

(A)                                                            (B)

Figure 1. The emission rates (A) and accumulation (B) of methane gas in the irrigated rice field

Note: STa = bare soil + without compost (T0); STb = rice crops + straw compost (Ta); STc = rice crops + cocoa pod husk compost (Tb); STd = rice crops + without compost (T0); MSTp = weeks after transplanting

(A)                                                            (B)

Figure 2. Emissions rates (A) and accumulation (B) of methane gas on dry maize crop land.

Note: BTa = Maize crops + without compost (T0); BTb = Maize crops + Cocoa Pod Husk Compost (Tb); MSTp = Week After Transplanting

Table 4. Methane emission rates (mg CH4 M-2 Hour-1) in irrigated rice fields with organic fertilizer application

Treatment

Week After Transplanting (MSTp)

2

4

6

8

10

Rata-rata

BTa

BTb

STa

STb

STc

STd

-0.0799

0.0285

0.2193

0.0696

0.2284

0.3712

-0.0376

0.1016

0.7675

0.2307

0.3163

0.3906

0.1816

-0.0788

0.8463

0.2569

0.4637

0.5528

0.1119

-0.5311

0.9023

0.1324

0.1758

0.2661

-0.0034

-0.1621

0.6259

0.0251

0.0057

0.1701

0.0344

-0.1283

0.6723

0.1430

0.2380

0.3502

Note: BTa = maize crops + without compost (T0); BTb = maize crops + cocoa pod husk compost (Tb); STa = bare soil + without compost (T0); STb = rice crops + straw compost (Ta); STc = rice crops + cocoa pod husk compost (Tb); STd = rice crops + without compost (T0); MSTp = weeks after transplanting

Table 5. Environmental temperature (℃) of rice fields and dry lands

Measurement Time

Environmental Temperature ()

Rice Field

Dry Field

Outside Mulch

Inside Mulch

Outside Mulch

Inside Mulch

2 MSTp/T

34

38

33

39

4 MSTp/T

33

39

34

40

6 MSTp/T

32

39

32

39

8 MSTp/T

35

41

33

38

10 MSTp/T

33

38

31

39

Average

33.3

39.0

32.6

38.4

A relatively high temperature will inhibit the methane genesis process since methanogenic microbes require an optimal temperature between 5 and 20℃.

3.4 N2O greenhouse gas emissions

The highest nitrous oxide (N2O) GHG emissions in rice fields occurred when the rice crops were at the 6th MSTp in all treatments and subsequently decreased from that point until harvest time. The emission pattern of N2O appears to follow the growth of rice crops in line with the growth of the active tillering phase to the maximum tillering phase and peaks at the time of primordial flower development (Figure 3). The application of rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost decreased the N2O emission rate compared to other treatments.

The pattern of N2O emissions in maize fields also followed the growth of maize crops, and at the 8th and 10th MSTp, emissions tended to decrease again (Figure 4A), while the cumulative emissions during the growth period until harvest appeared lower in cocoa pod husk-composted areas (Figure 4B).

The application of rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost to both rice and maize fields (Figure 5) shows that both treatments can reduce the level of N2O emissions. In the maize field, N2O emissions decreased to 71.42% compared to those in the field without compost, and N2O emissions were significantly different based on the actual levels with LSD tests, α =0.05. Similarly, the application of rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost in paddy fields suppressed N2O emissions by 30.39% to 42.62% compared to that in land with rice crops without compost (Std), and the difference was statistically significant based on the actual LSD test level of α= 0.05.

The high N2O emissions in the primordial flower growth stage or 6 MSTp that will decline during the productive stage mark the beginning of generative or reproductive growth in rice crops, during which root exudation is especially pronounced. This is the result of translocation of photosynthates from the leaves as a sink to the roots as a sink. [30] Root exudates serve as a source of energy for microorganisms, especially denitrifying bacteria in anaerobic soil conditions during metabolic processes [29]. Root exudates are rich in organic matter such as carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids fermented into acetate or CO2 and H+, some of which are used as electron acceptors of certain microorganisms.

Rice fields potentially show increased N2O gas emissions when the amount of N is available for the microorganism transformation process, either from fertilizers, organic matter, or N in the soil, including N fixed from the air by the symbiosis of crops and N-fixing microbes. Rice fields under anaerobic conditions are an ideal habitat for facultative anaerobic bacteria such as denitrifying bacteria that function well under adequate oxygen conditions or under N-depleted conditions to emit N2O and fix N2. The application of rice straw to rice field soil tends to increase the rate of nitrogen fixation, denitrification and N2O emissions, but composting, including with both straw compost and cocoa pod husk compost, can reduce N2O gas emissions (Figure 5B).

The application of inorganic N fertilizer without rice straw compost and cocoa pod husk compost resulted in higher N2O emissions than compost application without inorganic fertilizer. The low N2O emissions in paddy fields treated with rice straw and cocoa pod husk compost were associated with declining populations of denitrifiers. In addition, compost fertilizer will inhibit the nitrification of NH4+ to NO2-1 so that N2O [31] does not form. In addition, flooded soil conditions during the growth of plants create anaerobic soil conditions with a low Eh value that can reduce the content of NO3-1 and increase NH4+ and its content, including the content of polyphenols in the soil [6]. The increase in the polyphenol content in the soil may inhibit the activity of nitrifying bacteria and denitrifying bacteria despite the availability of NO3-1, even when the population of denitrifying bacteria around the roots of rice crops is relatively high.

(A)                                                            (B)

Figure 3. Emission rates (A) and accumulation (B) of dinitrous oxide gas in irrigated rice fields

Note: Note: STa = bare soil + without compost (T0); STb = rice crops + straw compost (Ta); STc = rice crops + cocoa pod husk compost (Tb); STd = rice crops + without compost (T0); MSTp = weeks after transplanting

(A)                                                            (B)

Figure 4. Emission rates (A) and accumulation (B) of nitrous oxide gas in the maize field

Note: BTa = maize crops + without compost (T0); BTb = maize crops + cocoa pod husk compost (Tb); MSTp = weeks after transplanting

(A)                                                            (B)

Figure 5. Total emissions of nitrous oxide in the maize field (A) and rice field (B)

Note: Sta= Rice field without crops without compost (BS); Stb= Rice field with crops+straw compost (T1); Stc= rice field with crops + cocoa pod husk compost (T2); and Std= rice field with crops without compost (T0)

Table 6. Average weight of sweet corn cobs without husks (t ha-1) with cocoa pod husk compost

Explanation

Treatment

Without Compost (T0)

Rice Straw Compost and Cocoa Pod Husk (Ta and Tb)

Yield Productivity (t ha-1)

6.3a

13.3b

Difference with the control

0

3.0

% Efficiency compared to the control

-

48.6%

Note: Lowercase letters in the same line represent similarities with HSD test, a=0,05

Table 7. Average yield of dried rice husk (t ha-1) with compost treatment

Explanation

Treatment

Without Compost (T0)

Rice straw (Ta)

Cocoa Pod Husk (Tb)

Yield Productivity (t ha-1)

6.2a

9.2b

8.8b

Difference to control

0

3.0

2.6

% Efficiency to control

-

32.6%

29.5%

Note: Lowercase letters in the same line represent similarities with HSD test, a=0.05

3.5 Maize yield

Sweet corn cultivated in Entisols Palu Valley is very responsive to organic fertilizer, as measured by the result of cob weights without husks. The response of sweet corn to cocoa pod husk compost application is presented in Table 6.

Table 6 shows the highest yield of sweet corn achieved in the administration of 5 tons ha-1 of cocoa pod husk compost of 400 g plant-1 or equivalent to 13.3 t ha-1. The highest yield achieved in Table 6 that exceeds the average yield of sweet corn farmers is 4.0-5.5 t ha-1 and has reached the average yield standard range based on the description of sweet corn, which is 10 t ha-1.

The efficiency of yield increases with the application of organic fertilizer cocoa pod husk compost. The highest yield efficiency was 48.6%, which was achieved from a dose of 5 t ha-1 cocoa pod husk compost. In line with the results of research [32], the application of cocoa pod husk compost can increase the yield of sweet corn crops by 45.20%.

The increase in yield as an effect of compost application reflects fairly good growth. This is because compost is an organic fertilizer that contains relatively complete nutrients that can provide essential elements for plants. Furthermore, [33] pointed out that organic matter can increase soil fertility and add nutrients and humus. It also affects the life of microorganisms that live in the soil, in addition to increasing the ability of the soil to reserve water. In soils with high organic content, nutrients become more available so that fertilization is more efficient.

The results of the economic analysis on the production of early harvested sweet corn are presented by taking into account the total cost of both fixed cost and variable cost. The value of B/C ratio obtained was 1.9.

3.6 Yield of rice field

The results show that organic fertilizer in rice fields has a positive effect on increasing rice production. The results obtained show that the productivity of rice fields increased up to 10.3 t ha-1 DUP (dry unhusked paddy) compared to that without organic fertilizer (control) with the production of 6.22 t ha-1 DUP. The highest production was obtained from the use of rice straw compost at 10.3 t ha-1 DUP, followed by the use of cocoa pod husk compost at 9.6 t ha-1, as shown in the Table 7.

The highest yield was obtained from the rice straw compost treatment, with an efficiency of 32.6%, while that of the cocoa fruit compost treatment was 29.5%. This means that compost fertilizer acts as a source of nutrients to increase the availability of nutrients for plants so that the yield increases. The application of organic material in the form of chicken manure fertilizer to rice fields can increase yield by 15% [33].

4. Conclusion

It was obtained that the average CH4 emissions during the rice growing period for the four land conditions showed that the highest was in rice field without crop (unplanted soil), was 0.6723 mg m-2 h-1 followed by rice fields with rice crops but without additional compost, was 0.3502 mg m-2 h-1, rice cultivation paddy with cocoa compost in puddle condition during plant growth, that was 0.2380 mg m-2 h-1 while the lowest in rice field with rice straw compost which was applied in a stagnant condition during plant growth, i.e., 0.143 mg m-2 h-1. The highest average yield of sweet corn was 5.5 t ha-1, and the yield of rice fields was 10.3 t ha-1 compared to that without organic fertilizer (control), with a production of 6.22 t ha-1, followed by fruit skin compost treatment cocoa at 9.6 t ha-1.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Tadulako University for providing funding for this study.

  References

[1] Fancello, G., Paddeu, D., Fadda, P. (2017). Investigating last food mile deliveries: A case study approach to identify needs of food delivery demand. Res Transp Econ., 65: 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.09.004

[2] Gardner, N., Manley, B.J.W., Pearson, J.M. (1993). Gas emissions from landfills and their contributions to global warming. Appl Energy, 44(2): 165-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(93)90059-X

[3] Yu, X.Y., Barnett, J.M., Amidan, B.G., Recknagle, K.P., Flaherty, J.E., Antonio, E.J., Glissmeyer, J.A. (2018). Evaluation of nitrous oxide as a substitute for sulfur hexafluoride to reduce global warming impacts of ANSI/HPS N13.1 gaseous uniformity testing. Atmos Environ, 176: 40-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.015

[4] Shao, H., Yang, S., Cai, F., Li, C., Liang, J., Li, Q., Hyun, S., Kao, S.J., Dou, Y., Hu, B., Dong, G., Wang, F. (2016). Sources and burial of organic carbon in the middle Okinawa Trough during late Quaternary paleoenvironmental change. Deep Sea Res Part Oceanogr Res Pap, 118: 46-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.10.005

[5] Luo, J.Y., Zhang, S., Zhu, X..Z., Lu, L.M., Wang, C.Y., Li, C.H., Cui, J.J., Zhou, Z.G. (2017). Effects of soil salinity on rhizosphere soil microbes in transgenic Bt cotton fields. J Integr Agric, 16(7): 1624-1633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61456-9

[6] Zhu, J., Qu, B., Li, M. (2017). Phosphorus mobilization in the Yeyahu Wetland: Phosphatase enzyme activities and organic phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere soils. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 124: 304-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.05.010

[7] Basir-Cyio, M. (2003). Studi Perubahan Karakteristik Kimia Ultisol Palolo Akibat Lama dan Tinggi Genangan. Agroland J Ilmu-Ilmu Pertan, 10: 222-228.

[8] Basir-Cyio, M., Hasanah, U., Nur, I., Serikawa, Y. (2012). Gold mining activities and its impacts on land degradation in Central Sulawesi Indonesia. J Ecotechnology Res, 16(3-4): 79-83.

[9] Nurliyana, M.Y., H’ng, P.S., Rasmina, H., Kalsom, M.S.U., Chin, K.L., Lee, S.H., Lum, W.C., Khoo, G.D. (2015). Effect of C/N ratio in methane productivity and biodegradability during facultative co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent and empty fruit bunch. Ind Crops Prod, 76: 409-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.047

[10] Shen, W., Liu, Y., Yan, B., Wang, J., He, P., Zhou, C., Huo, X., Zhang, W., Xu, G., Ding, Q. (2017). Cement industry of China: Driving force, environment impact and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 75: 618-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.033

[11] Bokhorst, S., Berg, M.P., Wardle, D.A. (2017). Micro-arthropod community responses to ecosystem retrogression in boreal forest. Soil Biol Biochem, 110: 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.009

[12] Annan-Diab, F., Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the sustainable development goals. Int J Manag Educ, 15(2): 73-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006

[13] Faham, E., Rezvanfar, A., Movahed-Mohammadi, S.H., et al. (2017). Using system dynamics to develop education for sustainable development in higher education with the emphasis on the sustainability competencies of students. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 123: 307-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.023

[14] Narodoslawsky, M. (2017). Bioenergy provision: utilizing contextual resources. Curr Opin Chem Eng, 17: 93-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2017.07.002

[15] Fedele, G., Locatelli, B., Djoudi, H. (2017). Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosyst Serv, 28: 43-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.011

[16] Rolston, D.E. (1986). Gas flux. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. ASA SSSA Madison Wis, 9: 1103-1119.

[17] Yang, S.S., Lai, C.M. (2002). Development and extension of the mitigationtechnology on greenhouse gases in agriculture sector, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University.

[18] IPCC. (2006). Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. IGES Jpn IPCC Natl Greenh Gas Invent Programme Tech Support Unit Inst Glob Environ Strateg, 2018: 240-0115.

[19] Khan, N., Clark, I., Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., Shea, S., Meier, S., Qi, F., Kookana, R.S., Bolan, N. (2016). Physical and chemical properties of biochars co-composted with biowastes and incubated with a chicken litter compost. Chemosphere, 142: 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.065

[20] Du, E. (2017). Integrating species composition and leaf nitrogen content to indicate effects of nitrogen deposition. Environ Pollut, 221: 392-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.001

[21] Ata-Ul-Karim, S.T., Zhu, Y., Cao, Q., Rehmani, M.I.A., Cao, W., Tang, L. (2017). In-season assessment of grain protein and amylose content in rice using critical nitrogen dilution curve. Eur J Agron, 90: 139-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.08.001

[22] Mahmoud, E., Ibrahim, M., Robin, P., Akkal-Corfini, N., El-Saka, M. (2009). Rice straw composting and its effect on soil properties. Compost Science & Utilization, 17(3): 146-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2009.10702415

[23] Huang, H., Huang, L., Zhang, Q., Jiang, Y., Ding, L. (2015). Chlorination decomposition of struvite and recycling of its product for the removal of ammonium-nitrogen from landfill leachate. Chemosphere, 136: 289-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.078

[24] Jimenez, J., Lei, H., Steyer, J.P., Houot, S., Patureau, D. (2017). Methane production and fertilizing value of organic waste: Organic matter characterization for a better prediction of valorization pathways. Bioresour Technol., 241: 1012-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.176

[25] Xiong, J., Liu, X., Liang, L., Zeng, Q. (2017). Adsorption of methane in organic-rich shale nanopores: An experimental and molecular simulation study. Fuel, 200: 299-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.083

[26] Brye, K.R., Nalley, L.L., Tack, J.B., Dixon, B.L., Barkley, A.P., Rogers, C.W., Smartt, A.D., Norman, R.J., Jagadish, K.S.V. (2016). Factors affecting methane emissions from rice production in the Lower Mississippi river valley, USA. Geoderma Reg, 7: 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.04.005

[27] Khosa, M.K., Sidhu, B.S., Benbi, D.K. (2010). Effect of organic materials and rice cultivars on methane emission from rice field. J Environt Biol., 31(3): 281-5.

[28] Demirtepe, H., Kjellerup, B., Sowers, K.R., Imamoglu, I. (2015). Evaluation of PCB dechlorination pathways in anaerobic sediment microcosms using an anaerobic dechlorination model. J Hazard Mater., 296: 120-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.033

[29] Faye, A., Sine, B., Chopart, J.L., Grondin, A., Lucas, M., Diedhiou, A.G., Gantet, P., Cournac, L., Min, D., Audebert, A., Kane, A., Laplaze, L. (2019). Development of a model estimating root length density from root impacts on a soil profile in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br). Application to measure root system response to water stress in field conditions. PLOS ONE, 14(7): e0214182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214182

[30] Banke-Thomas, A., Banke-Thomas, O., Kivuvani, M., Ameh, C.A. (2017). Maternal health services utilisation by Kenyan adolescent mothers: Analysis of the Demographic Health Survey 2014. Sex Reprod Healthc, 12: 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2017.02.004

[31] Girón-Rojas, C., Gil, E., Garcia-Ruiz, A., Iglesias, N., López, M. (2020). Assessment of biowaste composting process for industrial support tool development through macro data approach. Waste Manag., 105: 364-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.019

[32] Isrun, B. (2016). Study of Specific Fertilization Recommendation Locations in Sigi District., Center for Assessment of Natural Resources and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, Tadulako University, Palu, Central Sulawesi. Unpub.

[33] Peigné, J., Vian, J.F., Payet, V., Saby, N.P.A. (2018). Soil fertility after 10 years of conservation tillage in organic farming. Soil Tillage Res., 175: 194-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.09.008