© 2020 IIETA. This article is published by IIETA and is licensed under the CC BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
OPEN ACCESS
The current development of renewable energies has originated a number of new structural typologies that are the physical support of the energy production systems. Photovoltaic energy is a very mature source and it is obtained using rows of panels implemented in a longitudinal grillage. Many studies have been carried out in the past with an aim to improve the capacity to obtain electrical power, but another important issue is the need to guarantee the performance of these industrial facilities under the phenomena induced by the turbulent wind flow, taking into account the fact that they are usually built in wide open spaces. This paper describes an extensive research carried out on two configurations of solar trackers by experimental and computational methods. The former was composed of a number of tests of reduced models of segments of the solar trackers, which were carried out in an aerodynamic wind tunnel. The latter consisted of a series of structural analyses worked out through a finite element model of the full panel subjected to aerodynamic and aeroelastic loads. Several angles of attack of the wind flow and a wide range of wind speeds were included in the study. This approach allowed to clearly evaluate the structural and dynamic performance of both the configurations of solar trackers under the most important wind-induced phenomena such as vortex shedding, torsional divergence, and flutter. The paper relates the phases of the study and informs about the more relevant numerical results obtained in the experiments and the computer analysis.
aerodynamic and aeroelastic loads, finite elements models, flutter, photovoltaic energy, solar trackers, structural analysis, torsional divergence, vortex shedding, wind tunnel test
[1] Simiu, E. & Scanlan, R.H., Wind effects on structures. Fundamentals and Applicationsto Design. Wiley & Sons: New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto and Singapore,1996.
[2] Dyrbye, C. & Hansen, S.O., Wind loads on structures. Fundamentals and Applicationsto Design. Wiley & Sons: Chichester, New York, Brisbane, Toronto and Singapore,1997.
[3] Bibin, C., Selvaraj, M.J. & Sanju, S., Flutter analysing over an aircraft wing duringcruise speed. Procedia Engineering, 38, pp. 1950–1961, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.238
[4] Shubov, M.A., Flutter phenomenon in aeroelasticity and its mathematical analysis.Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 19(1), pp. 1–12, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0893-1321(2006)19:1(1)
[5] Yoon, N.K., Chung, C.H., Na, Y.-H. & Shin, S.J., Control reversal and torsional divergenceanalysis for a high-aspect-ratio wing. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology,26(12), pp. 3921–3931, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0889-2
[6] Bruce Ralphin Rose, J. & Jinu, G.R. Influence of aeroelastic control reversal problem inthe airplane lateral stability modes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 229(3), pp. 517–533, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410014537241
[7] Mondal, T., Das, M.K. & Guha, A. Periodic vortex shedding phenomenon for variousseparation distances between two plane turbulent parallel jets. International Journal ofHeat and Mass Transfer, 99, pp. 576–588. 2016.
[8] Sikien, E.R., Abdullah, A., Zulkafli, M.F. & Rahim, M.Z. The effects of vortex sheddingon the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. ARPN Journal of Engineering andApplied Sciences, 13(24), pp. 9344–9351, 2018.
[9] Scott, R., In the Wake of Tacoma. Suspension Bridges and the Quest for AerodynamicStability. ASCE Press: USA, 2001.
[10] Scanlan, R.H., Studies of suspension bridge deck flutter instability. CASI/AIAA SubsonicAero-and Hydro-Dynamics Meeting, p. 9, 1969.
[11] Larsen, A., Aerodynamic aspects of the final design of the 1624 m suspension bridgeacross the Great Belt. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,48(2–3), pp. 261–285, 1993.
[12] Jurado, J.A. & Hernández, S., Sensitivity analysis of bridge flutter with respect tomechanical parameters of the deck. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization,27(4), pp. 272–283, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-003-0374-8
[13] Larsen, A. & Wall, A., Shaping of bridge box girders to avoid vortex shedding response.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 104–106, pp. 159–165,2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.018
[14] Yuan, W., Laima, S., Chen, W., Li, H. & Hu, H., Investigation on the vortex-and-wakeinducedvibration of a separated-box bridge girder. Journal of Fluids and Structures,70, pp. 145–161, 2017.
[15] Laima, S., Li, H., Chen, W., & Ou, J., Effects of attachments on aerodynamic characteristicsand vortex-induced vibration of twin-box girder. Journal of Fluids and Structures,77, pp. 115–133, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.12.005
[16] Boonyapinyo, V., Lauhatanon, Y. & Lukkunaprasit, P., Nonlinear aerostatic stabilityanalysis of suspension bridge. Engineering Structures, 28, pp. 793–803, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.008
[17] Cheng, J., Jiang, J., Xiao, R.C, & Xiang, H.F., Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysisJiang Yin suspension bridge. Engineering Structures, 24, pp. 773–781, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00006-8
[18] Qian, C. & Zhu, L. Study on the mechanism of aerostatic instability of long-span cablestayedbridges. In the 15th Int. Conf. on Wind Eng. Beijing, China, 1–6 September 2019.
[19] Jonsson, E., Riso, C., Lupp, C.A., Cesnik, C.E.S., Martins, J.R.R.A. & Epureanu, B.I.,Flutter and post-flutter constraints in aircraft design optimization. Progress in AerospaceSciences, 109, Art. No. 100537, 2019.
[20] Dillinger, J., Abdalla, M., Klimmek, T. & Gürdal, Z., Static Aeroelastic Stiffness Optimizationand Investigation of Forward Swept Composite Wings. 10th World congress onstructural and multidisciplinary optimization, Orlando, FL, 2013.
[21] Kusano, I., Baldomir, A., Jurado, J.A. & Hernandez, S., Reliability based design optimizationof long-span bridges considering flutter. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 135, pp.149–162, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.10.006
[22] Cid Montoya, M., Hernandez, S., & Nieto, F., Shape optimization of streamlined decksof cable-stayed bridges considering aeroelastic and structural constraints. J. Wind Eng.Ind. Aerod., 177, pp. 429–455, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.018
[23] Cid Montoya, M., Hernandez, S., Nieto, F., Kareen, A. & Jurado, J.A. Aerostructuralshape and size optimization of a long span cable stayed bridge considering serviceloads, static wing loads, torsional divergence, flutter and buffeting constraints. In the15th Int. Conf. on Wind Eng. Beijing, China, 2–6 September 2019.
[24] Jurado, J.A., Hernández, S., Nieto, F. & Mosquera, A., Bridge Aeroelasticiy. SensitivityAnalysis and Optimal Design. WIT Press: Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst. Southampton, 2011.
[25] Rizk, J. & Chaiko, Y., Solar Tracking System: More Efficient Use of Solar Panels.World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 41, 2008.
[26] Vieira, R.G., Guerra, F.K.O.M.V., Vale, M.R.B.G. & Araújo, M.M., Comparative performanceanalysis between static solar panels and single-axis tracking system on a hotclimate region near to the equator. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, pp.672–681, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.089
[27] Aziz, S. & Hassan, S., On improving the efficiency of a solar panel tracking system.Procedia Manufacturing, 7, pp. 218–224, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.12.053
[28] Racharla, S. & Rajan, K., Solar tracking system–a review. International Journal ofSustainable Engineering, 10(2), pp. 72–81, 2017.
[29] Hernandez, S., Mendez, J., Nieto, F. & Jurado, J.A., Aerodynamic analysis of a photovoltaicsolar tracker. EACWE5. The Fifth European & African Conference on WindEngineering, Firenze, July 2009.
[30] Ibrahim, S.R., Fundamentals of Time Domain Modal Identification. In Silva, J.M.M.,& Maia N.M.M. eds., Modal Analysis and Testing. NATO Science Series (Series E:Applied Sciences), Vol. 363. Springer, Dordrecht, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4503-9_11
[31] Smith, W.R., Least squares time-domain method for simultaneous identification ofvibration parameters from multiple free-response records. Proceedings of 22nd AIAAStructures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 194–201, 1981.
[32] Chen, A., He, X. & Xiang, H., Identification of 18 flutter derivatives of bridge decks.Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamic, 90, pp. 2007–2022, 2002.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6105(02)00317-3
[33] Diana, G., Resta, F., Zasso, A., Belloli, M. & Rocchi, D., Forced motion and freemotion aeroelastic tests on a new concept dynamometric section model of the Messinasuspension bridge. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamic, 92(6),pp. 441–462, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.01.005
[34] Jurado, J.Á., Kusano, I., Hernández, S. & Nieto, F., Improvement of multimodal flutteranalysis code, FLAS. EACWE. Proc. European and African Congress in Wind EngineeringCambridge, UK, 7–11 July, 2013.
[35] Øiseth, O., Rönnquist, A. & Sigbjörnsson, R., Simplified prediction of wind-inducedresponse and stability limit of slender long-span suspension bridges, based on modifiedquasi-steady theory: A case study. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,98(12), pp. 730–741, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2010.06.009
[36] Chopra, A.K., Dynamic of structures. Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering,Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1995.