Seismic Response Analyses of RC Portal Frames with Large Deformable Elastic Braces

Seismic Response Analyses of RC Portal Frames with Large Deformable Elastic Braces

Kiichiro Sawada

Shimane University, Japan

Page: 
880-886
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N5-880-886
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Large deformable elastic braces (LDEBs) are devices which do never yield subject to large deforma-tion under great earthquakes. In structures with LDEBs, elastic restoring force by LDEBs can improve seismic response under great earthquakes. In previous works, the effectiveness of LDEBs for the steel structures was confirmed by experimental tests and seismic response analyses. Here, the topology of LDEBs is determined by an optimization method, and seismic response analyses of RC portal frames with LDEBs are conducted. The effectiveness of LDEBs for the RC structures is discussed. RC portal frame are designed by Japanese seismic design code. LDEBs are equipped with the frame as knee braces. Seismic responses of not only the frame with LDEBs but also that without LDEBs are computed by dynamic nonlinear analysis software. In the analysis LDEBs are regarded as elastic bar elements. An input earthquake is JMA Kobe NS wave (1995 Kobe earthquakes). Hysteresis of story shear force and story drift, axial deformation of LDEBs, maximum and residual story drift are investigated. It is observed from computational results that LDEBs show remarkable improvements on maximum and residual story drifts of RC portal frame under a very large amplitude earthquake such as 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan.

Keywords: 

an optimization method, large deformable elastic braces, RC frames, seismic response analyses

  References

[1] Dargush, G.F. & Soong, T.T., Behavior of metallic plate dampers in seismic passive energy dissipation systems. Earthquake Spectra, 11(4), pp. 545–568, 1995.https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585827

[2] Takewaki, I., Murakami, S., Yoshitomi, S. & Tsuji, M., Fundamental mechanism of earthquake response reduction in building structures with inertial dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 19(6), pp. 590–608, 2012.https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.457

[3] Takeya, N. & Shioya, S., Discussion for depressing a residual deformation of RC beam flexural yielded after Earthquake (Part.1). Proceeding AIJ Annual Meeting, 2011.

[4] Harada, Y. & Akiyama, H., Seismic design of flexible-stiff mixed frame with energy concentration. Engineering Structures, 20(12), pp. 1039–1044, 1998.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00201-0

[5] Sawada, K., Nishida, G., Nakamura, K., Eto, H. & Tsuruda, M., Computational study on seismic steel structures with large deformable elastic braces. Eighth International Conference on Steel and Aluminum Structures, Hong Kong, China, December 2016 (USB).

[6] Sawada, K., Matsuo, A. & Shimizu, H., Randomized line search techniques in com-bined GA for discrete sizing optimization of truss structures. Structural and Multidisci-plinary Optimization, 44(3), pp. 337–350, 2011.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0629-8

[7] Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. & Park, R., Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), pp. 1804–1826, 1988.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)

[8] www.seismosoft.com/seismostruct