Finer Theoretical Aspects of the Drift Flux Family of Equations for Simulating Averaged Volume Fraction in Multiphase Flows

Finer Theoretical Aspects of the Drift Flux Family of Equations for Simulating Averaged Volume Fraction in Multiphase Flows

A.S. Nagoo | M.M. Sharma 

Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas, Austin, USA

Page: 
240-250
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N2-240-250
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The drift flux formulation is widely regarded as being amenable to computationally efficient calculation of averaged slip between phases (i.e. averaged volume fraction) in multiphase flows. However, contrary to the common perception in practice that this formulation provides two simple data-fitting parameters for describing averaged slip, it is shown that these parameters cannot be mathematically disassociated from each other and are intricately related to both the averaged and local phase velocities and volume fractions. This derived fact also provides a rational explanation for the extreme difficulty in the past to resolve the influence of the local lateral distribution (multidimensional) effects of the dispersed phase in the flow on the averaged flow characteristics. Of further significance from this derivation is the fact that correlations for drift flux parameters in which these terms are expressed explicitly from each other cannot claim a better understanding of the flow physics unless they capture this inherent analytical bidirectional dependency. All of the multiphase flow variables that affect the drift velocity parameter also affect the distribution parameter. In terms of simulation applications, the new analytical derivations presented enable a re-formulation and unification of prior volume fraction models and an explanation for field observations of why a reduction in the drift velocity parameter will lead to reduction in the distribution parameter. As much as numerical computing and simulation methods are invaluable tools, the results of this work show that it is equally important to explore their mathematical basis and scientific understanding that can help to advance more efficient simulation of multiphase flow behaviors in the field.

Keywords: 

analytical prediction, drift flux parameters, fractional flow theory, multiphase flow simulation, pipe, pipeline, slip ratio, volume fraction, wellbore

  References

[1] Zuber, N. & Findlay, J.A., Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. Journal of Heat Transfer, 87, pp. 453–468, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3689137

[2] Chexal, B. & Lellouche, G., Void fraction correlation for generalized applications. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 27(4), pp. 255–295, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-1970(92)90007-P

[3] Armand, A.A., The resistance during the movement of a two-phase system in horizontal pipes. Atomic Energy Research Establishment Transactions, 828(1), pp. 16–23, 1946.

[4] Bankoff, S.G., A variable density single-fluid model two-phase flow with particular reference to steam-water. Journal of Heat Transfer, 11(Series B), pp. 265–272, 1960.

[5] Franca, F. & Lahey, Jr., R.T., The use of drift-flux techniques for the analysis of horizontal two-phase flows International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 18(6), pp. 787–801, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(92)90059-P

[6] Guet, S. & Ooms, G., Fluid mechanical aspects of the gas-lift technique. Annual Reviews of Fluid Mechanics, 38, pp. 255–249, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.061505.093942

[7] Garnier, C., Lance, M. & Marie, J.L., Measurement of local flow characteristics in buoyancy-driven bubbly flow at high void fraction. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 26, pp. 811–815, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1777(02)00198-X

[8] Clark, N.N. & Flemmer, R.L., Predicting the holdup in two-phase bubble upflow    and downflow using the Zuber and Findlay Drift-Flux model. AIChE Journal, 31(3), pp. 500–503, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690310323

[9] Guet, S., Ooms, G., Oliemans, R.V.A. & Mudde, R.F., Bubble size effect on low liquid input drift-flux parameters. Chemical Engineering Science, 59, pp. 3315–3329, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.03.036

[10] Hibiki, T. & Ishii, M., Distribution parameter and drift velocity of drift-flux model in bubbly flow. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 45, pp. 707–721, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00195-8

[11] Butterworth, D., A comparison of some void-fraction relationships for co-current gasliquid flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1, pp. 845–850, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(75)90038-5

[12] Lockhart, R.W. & Martinelli, R.C., Proposed correlation of data for isothermal twophase, twocomponent flow in pipes. Journal of Chemical Engineering Progress, 45(1), pp. 39–48, 1949.

[13] Fauske, H., Critical two-phase, steam–water flows. Proceeding of the 1961 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, Stanford University Press, 1961.

[14] Zivi, S.M., Estimation of steady state steam void fraction by means of the principle of minimum entropy production. Journal of Heat Transfer, 86, pp. 247–252, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3687113

[15] Nicklin, D.J., Wilkes, J.O. & Davidson, J.F., Two-phase flow in vertical tubes. Transaction of Institution Chemical Engineers, 40(61), 1962.

[16] Ishii, M., Thermo-Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two-Phase Flow, Eyrolles, Paris, 1975.

[17] Greskovich, E.J. & Cooper, W.T., Correlation and prediction of gas liquid holdups in inclined upflows. AIChE Journal, 21, pp. 1189–1192, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690210619

[18] Garcia, F., Garcia, R. & Joseph, D.D., Composite power law holdup correlations in horizontal pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 31, pp. 1276–1303, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2005.07.007

[19] Chen, J.J. & Spedding, P.L., An analysis of holdup in horizontal two-phase gas liquid flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2, pp. 147–159, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(83)90049-6

[20] Premoli, A., Francesco, D. & Prima, A., An empirical correlation for evaluating twophase mixture density under adiabatic conditions. European Two-Phase Flow Group Meeting, Milan, Italy, 1970.

[21] Hetsroni, G., Handbook of Multiphase Systems, Hemisphere Publ. Co., 1982.

[22] Watterson, J.K., Cooper, R.K. & Spedding, P.L., Prediction of pressure loss and holdup in two-phase horizontal stratified roll-wave pipe flow. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 41, pp. 6621–6622, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010749y

[23] Woldesmayat, M.A. & Ghajar, A.J., Comparison of void fraction correlations for different flow patterns in horizontal and upward inclined pipes. Internatioanal Journal of Multiphase Flow, 33, pp. 347–370, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.09.004

[24] Spedding, P.L. & Nguyen, V.T., Data on holdup, pressure loss and flow pattern for twophase, air-water flow in an inclined pipe. Report 122, U. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 1976.