A Parametric Study for Euler-Granular Model in Dilute Phase Vertical Pneumatic Conveying

A Parametric Study for Euler-Granular Model in Dilute Phase Vertical Pneumatic Conveying

W.K. Hiromi Ariyaratne | Prasanna Welahettige Morten C. Melaaen 

Faculty of Technology, Natural Sciences and Maritime Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, Norway

Page: 
46-58
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N1-46-58
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The Euler-Granular approach was used to predict pneumatic conveying characteristics of vertically upward dilute phase flow. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulations were carried out for 8 m long and 30.5 mm diameter circular pipe. The density of conveyed materials was 1020 kgm-3. Simulations for different particle diameters: 200 µm, 500 µm and 3 mm were performed. The air velocities ranged from 7 to 16 ms-1 and solid to air mass flow ratios ranged from 1.2 to 3.6. The main objective of this study was to analyse the sensitivity of specularity coefficient in Johnson and Jackson particle-wall boundary conditions on conveying characteristics. It was found that there is a significant sensitivity of certain ranges of specularity coefficients on pressure drop, air and particle velocities and solid distribution in pipe cross section. Among the tested range of the specularity coefficient values, some values are recommended for different particle sizes by comparing the predicted results with experimental data from existing literature. Moreover, it was also found that the coefficient of restitution for particle-wall collisions which counts the momentum loss by the walls in normal direction has less sensitivity on the results compared to that of specularity coefficient which counts the momentum loss by the walls in tangential direction.

Keywords: 

air velocity, computational fluid dynamics, particle velocity, pressure drop, solid distribution, specularity coefficient

  References

[1] Ratnayake, C., A comprehensive scaling up technique for pneumatic transport systems [PhD], Telemark University College, Norway, 2005.

[2] Chandra, K.A., Ariyaratne, W.K.H. & Melaaen, M.C., Prediction of Dilute Phase Pneu- matic Conveying Characteristics Using MP-PIC Method. Proceedings of EUROSIM 2016, September 13–16 2016; Oulu, Finland. Published by IEEE, ISBN 978-1-5090- 4119-0, pp. 593–598, 2016, available at: http://eurosim2016.info.

[3] Ariyaratne, W.K.H., Manjula, E.V.P.J., Ratnayake, C. & Melaaen, M.C., CFD Approaches for Modeling Gas-Solids Multiphase Flows – A Review. Proceedings of EUROSIM 2016, September 13–16 2016 2016; Oulu, Finland. Published by IEEE, ISBN 978-1-5090-4119-0, pp. 629–634, 2016, available at: http://eurosim2016.info

[4] Patro, P. & Dash, S.K., Two-fluid modeling of turbulent particle–gas suspensions in verti- cal pipes. Powder Technology, 264, pp. 320–331, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.05.048

[5] Azizi, S., Mowla, D. & Ahmadi, G., Numerical evaluation of turbulence models for dense to dilute gas–solid flows in vertical conveyor. Particuology, 10(5), pp. 553–561, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.12.006

[6] Zhao, Y., Ding, T., Zhu, L. & Zhong, Y., A specularity coefficient model and its appli- cation to dense particulate flow simulations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 55(5), pp. 1439–1448, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03792

[7] Loha, C., Chattopadhyay, H. & Chatterjee, P.K., Euler-Euler CFD modeling of fluid- ized bed: Influence of specularity coefficient on hydrodynamic behavior. Particuology, 11(6), pp. 673–680, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.08.007

[8] Zhong, H., Lan, X., Gao, J., Zheng, Y. & Zhang, Z., The difference between specularity coefficient of 1 and no-slip solid phase wall boundary conditions in CFD simulation of gas–solid fluidized beds. Powder Technology, 286, pp. 740–743, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.08.055

[9] Johnson, P.C. & Jackson, R., Frictional–collisional constitutive relations for granular mate- rials, with application to plane shearing. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 176, pp. 67–93, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112087000570

[10] Tsuji, Y., Morikawa, Y. & Shiomi, H., LDV measurements of an air-solid two-phase flow in a vertical pipe. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 139, pp. 417–434, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112084000422

[11] Ariyaratne, W.K.H., Ratnayake, C. & Melaaen, M.C., Eularian-Eularian Approach for Modeling Dilute Phase Pneumatic Conveying in a Horizontal Pipe. Proceedings of ICBMH 2016 July 11–14 2016; Darwin, Australia, pp. 409–416, 2016.

[12] Benyahia, S., Syamlal, M. & O’Brien, T.J., Evaluation of boundary conditions used  to model dilute, turbulent gas/solids flows in a pipe. Powder Technology, 156(2–3), pp. 62–72, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2005.04.002

[13] Ariyaratne, W.K.H., Ratnayake, C. & Melaaen, M.C., CFD Modelling of dilute phase pneumatic conveying in a horizontal pipe using Euler-Euler approach. Advanced Powder Technology, submitted, 2016.