OPEN ACCESS
Steam cycles are a mature technology that has been used for many decades to produce power from heat. Novel expanders that can expand in the two-phase region have been developed for years but only recently have achieved a level of maturity that makes them commercially interesting.
In this study wet and dry steam cycles recovering heat from gas turbines in offshore industry are compared in a thermodynamic basis. Three different cycle configurations are studied in three scenarios with different combinations of power and heat demand. Every case is optimized with and without restrictions for two-phase steam expansion.
It is shown that wet expansion cycles can achieve higher steam pressures which increase steam cycle efficiency. Steam cycle power increase has been found to be large for single expansion cases (20%) due to the low pressures that can be achieved by the dry cycles.
Optimization of two-stage wet expansion does not produce significant improvements and in some cases results are equivalent to single stage wet expansion cycles.
Energy savings and CO2 emissions reduction when comparing with the reference cases without steam cycle installation are found to be in the range of 17%–26%.
offshore industry, steam cycles, wet expansion
[1] Nguyen, T-V., Pierobon, L., Elmegaard, B., Haglind, F., Breuhaus, P. & Voldsund, M., Exergetic assessment of energy systems on North Sea oil and gas platforms. Energy, 62, pp. 23–26, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.011
[2] Kehlhofer, R.H., Warner, J., Nielsen, H. & Bachman, R., Combined-Cycle Gas and Steam Turbine Power Plants, PennWell Publishing Company, 1999.
[3] Mazzetti, M.J, Nekså, P., Walnum, H.T. & Hemmingsen, A.K.T., Energy-efficient technologies for reduction of offshore CO2 emissions. Oil and Gas Facilities, 3(01), pp. 40–47, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/169811-PA
[4] Mazzetti, M., Kus, B., Walnum, H., Nekså, P., Skaugen, G., Hagen, B. & Ladam, Y., Flexible combined heat and power systems for offshore oil and gas facilities with CO2 bottoming cycles. Proceedings of the ASME Power Conference, 2, 2014.
[5] Skaugen, G., Walnum, H.T., Hagen, B., Kus, B., Clos, D., Mazzetti, M. & Nekså, P., Design and optimization of waste heat recovery unit using carbon dioxide as cooling fluid. Proceedings of the ASME Power Conference, 2, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/power2014-32165
[6] Welch, P., Boyle, P., Sells, M. & Murillo, I., Performance of new turbines for geothermal power plants. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 34, pp. 1091–1096, 2010.
[7] Welch, P. & Boyle, P., New turbines to enable efficient geothermal power plants. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 33, pp. 765–772, 2009.
[8] Welch, P., Boyle, P., Giron, M. & Sells, M., Construction and startup of low temperature geothermal power plants. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 35, pp. 1351–1356, 2011.
[9] Öhman, H. & Lundqvist, P., Comparison and analysis of performance using low temperature power cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 52(1), pp. 160–169, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.11.024
[10] Smith, I.K., Stosic, N. & Kovacevic, A., Screw expanders increase output and decrease the cost of geothermal binary power plant systems. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 29, pp. 787–794, 2005.
[11] Smith, I.K., Stosic, N. & kovacevic, A., Power recovery from low cost two-phase expanders. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 25, pp. 601–605, 2001.
[12] Conference, Purdue University, Indiana, USA.
[13] Smith, I., Stosic, N. & Aldis, C., Trilateral flash cycle system: a high efficiency power plant for liquid resources. World Geothermal Congress, Florence: Italy, 1995.
[14] http://www.opcon.se/web/Opcon_Powerbox_WST-CU_2.aspx
[15] Thermoflow. GT MASTER 21.0; 2011.