Parametric Sensitivity Comparison of Simulation Models for Flyer Plate Impact Experiments

Parametric Sensitivity Comparison of Simulation Models for Flyer Plate Impact Experiments

D. Somasundaram S. K. Roy M. Trabia B. O’toole R. Hixson 

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, USA

National Security Technologies, LLC, USA

Page: 
305-315
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V3-N4-305-315
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

This article presents a study of the sensitivities of different parameters that affect the accuracy of simulating flyer plate impact experiments. Two approaches are explored: the CTH hydrodynamic and the LS-DYNA smoothed particle hydrodynamic (SPH) codes. Simulations using these two methods are compared to experimental data from a single-stage gas gun experiment in which a copper flyer plate impacted another copper target plate. The experiment was designed to cause spall in the target plate. The numerical simulations are conducted using these combined physics models: the Mie–Grüneisen equation of state, the Johnson–Cook compressive strength model, and spall rupture. Effects of artificial viscosity, spall strength, and computational cell size are studied and discussed with the objective of improving the accuracy of these simulations. The results are verified by applying the proposed simulation approach to other flyer plate experiments.

Keywords: 

CTH, Johnson–Cook material model, smoothed particle hydrodynamics, spall strength, SPH

  References

[1] Johnson, J. N., Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids. Journal of Applied Physics, 52(4), pp. 2812–2825, 1981. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.329011

[2] Curran D. R., Seaman, L., & Shockey, D. A. Dynamic failure of solids. Physics Reports, 147(5–6), pp. 253–388, 1987. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(87)90049-4

[3] Molinari, A. & Wright, T. W., A physical model for nucleation and early growth of voids in ductile materials under dynamic loading. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 53(7), pp. 1476–1504, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2005.02.010

[4] Yu, Y., Chen, D., Tan, H., Wang, H., Xie, S. & Zhang, M., Spall investigations for LY12 Al using triangular waves. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 34(3), pp. 395–404, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.11.006

[5] Kanel, G. I., Spall fracture: methodological aspects, mechanisms, and governing factors. International Journal of Fracture, 163(1–2), pp. 173–191, 2010. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9438-0

[6] Escobedo, J. P., Dennis-Koller, D., Cerreta, E. K., Patterson, B. M., Bronkhorst, C. A., Hansen, B. L. & Lebensohn, R. A., Effects of grain size and boundary structure on the dynamic tensile response of copper. Journal of Applied Physics, 110(3), 033513, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3607294

[7] Bat’kov, Y. V., Ignatova, O. N., Kondrokhina, I. N., Malyshev, A. N., Nadezhin, S. S., Podurets, A. M. & and Preston, D. L., Specific features of the damage nucleation stage under severe loading of copper. Physics of the Solid State, 53(4), pp. 768–772, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1063783411040068

[8] Richter, H., Simulating transient effects of pulsed beams on beam intercepting devices, Doctoral dissertation, CERN, 2011.

[9] Hallquist, J. O., LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual, Version 971, 1, Livermore Software and Technology Corporation: Livermore, CA, 2008.

[10] Hertel, Jr., E. S., CTH: a software family for multi-dimensional shock physics analysis, Shock Waves @ Marseille I, Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 377–382, 1995.

[11] Hixson, R. S., Private communication, 9 September 2013, National Security Technolo- gies, LLC: USA.

[12] Barker, L. M. & Hollenbach, R. E., Shock-wave studies of PMMA, fused silica, and sapphire. Journal of Applied Physics, 41(10), pp. 4208–4226, 1970.

[13] Somasundaram, D., Trabia, M., O’Toole, B., & Hixson, R., Variables affecting smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of high velocity flyer plate impact experiments. WIT Transactions on Structures Under Shock and Impact XIII, WIT Press, ISSN 174-4498, 2014.

[14] Hixson, R. S., Gray, G. T., Rigg, P. A., Addessio, L. B., & Yablinsky, C. A., Dynamic damage investigations using triangular waves, Shock Compression of Condensed Matter – 2003: Proceedings of the Conference of the American Physical Society Topical Group on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, 706 (1), 2004.

[15] Marsh, S. P., LANL Shock Hugoniot Data, University of California Press: Oakland, CA 1980.

[16] Johnson, G. R. & Cook, W. H., A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperature, Proc. of 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 541–547, 1983.

[17] Grady, D., The spall strength of condensed matter. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 36(3), pp. 353–384, 1988. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(88)90015-4

[18] Mukherjee, D., Ray, A., Sur, A., Joshi, K. & Gupta, S., Shock induced spall fracture in polycrystalline copper. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1591, pp. 608, 2014. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4872691

[19] Sapphire Properties, http://www.roditi.com/SingleCrystal/Sapphire/Properties.html