OPEN ACCESS
The safety and stability of the vehicle are some of the most important factors when the vehicle moves on the road. If the driver suddenly steers at high speed, it may cause instability (oversteering, understeering). One of the solutions used to limit this situation is to use a 4wheels steering system instead of the conventional 2wheels steering system. This article focuses on establishing the spatial dynamics model of the vehicle and simulating the trajectory of the vehicle in the case of 4wheels steering and 2wheels steering in different moving conditions. The results of the study show that when the vehicle was equipped with the 4wheels steering system, the stability of the vehicle was improved. Therefore, if the vehicles use the 4wheels steering system, the oversteering and understeering phenomenon can be reduced.
dynamic vehicle, 4wheels steering, understeering, oversteering
The automobiles are versatile vehicles commonly used around the world. With the development of technology, engineering, and infrastructure, vehicles can move at very high speeds. However, this has also increased the number of crashes, rollovers, … One of the leading causes of these accidents is instability when changing the direction of the movement of the vehicle. This instability is characterized by the steering system through two phenomena: oversteering and understeering [1, 2].
The oversteering phenomenon occurs mainly when the vehicle turns around at high speed. At this time, the turning radius of the vehicle is quite small. With the sudden appearance of the centrifugal force, the vehicle can be rollover in an extremely small amount of time. To limit this phenomenon, the trajectory of the vehicle (turning radius) needs to be increased.
The understeering phenomenon often occurs when the vehicle changes lanes at high speed. The trajectory of movement (lateral) of the vehicle is quite large. Therefore, the vehicle will be deviated from the lanes and risk hitting other obstacles such as median strips, adjacent vehicles, … To minimize this situation, it is necessary to reduce the trajectory (lateral) of the vehicle when changing lanes at high speed.
Several solutions have been introduced to improve the stability of the vehicle when steering such as equipping the Electronic Stability Program (ESP), Active Suspension (AS), … However, this problem has not been resolved yet. Today, modern vehicles are using the 4wheels steering system instead of the 2wheels steering system to improve safety and stability when steering. Actual results show that safety and stability have been significantly improved [3].
Rehan et al. [4] demonstrated that the turning radius of the vehicle equipped with the 4wheels steering system will be smaller than that of the conventional 2wheels steering system. Singh, A. et al also verified these problems in their study [5]. Spentzas et al. [6] introduced the dynamics model of the 4wheels steering that used simple modeling.
Many studies on 4wheels steering systems to improve stability and minimize the turning radius of the vehicles have been performed [79]. Gao et al. [10] introduced the algorithm to control the 4wheels steering system by the LQR controller. Ping, X. et al also showed a simulation method of the 4wheels steering system based on the PID control algorithm [11]. Besides, studies on control and coordination of the 4wheels electronic steering system have also been conducted [1224]. In general, the results of these studies show that the 4wheels steering system helps the vehicles move more safely and stably, limiting the effects of the oversteering and understeering at high speed.
This study focuses on establishing the dynamic model of the vehicle when steering and simulating the trajectory under different steering conditions to show the difference between the 4wheels steering system and the 2wheels steering system.
2.1 Establish the doubletrack dynamic model
To determine the vehicle's trajectory when steering, the doubletrack dynamic model was used (Figure 1). The movement of the vehicle is described based on the following 3 equations below.
The equation describing the longitudinal movement of the vehicle:
$M\left[ {{{\dot{v}}}_{x}}\left( \dot{\alpha }+\dot{\psi } \right){{v}_{y}} \right]=\sum\limits_{i,j=1}^{2}{\left( {{F}_{xij}}cos{{\delta }_{ij}}{{F}_{yij}}sin{{\delta }_{ij}} \right){{F}_{1}}}$ (1)
The equation describing the lateral movement of the vehicle:
$M\left[ {{{\dot{v}}}_{y}}+\left( \dot{\alpha }+\dot{\psi } \right){{v}_{x}} \right]=\sum\limits_{i,j=1}^{2}{\left( {{F}_{xij}}sin{{\delta }_{ij}}+{{F}_{yij}}cos{{\delta }_{ij}} \right){{F}_{2}}}$ (2)
The equation describing the rotation of the vehicle around the axis:
${{I}_{Z}}\ddot{\psi }=\sum\limits_{i,j=1}^{2}{\left[ \begin{align} & {{\left( 1 \right)}^{j}}\left( {{F}_{xij}}cos{{\delta }_{ij}}{{F}_{yij}}sin{{\delta }_{ij}} \right){{t}_{wi}}+{{F}_{i}}{{c}_{i}}+ \\ & {{\left( 1 \right)}^{i+1}}\left( {{F}_{xij}}sin{{\delta }_{ij}}+{{F}_{yij}}cos{{\delta }_{ij}} \right){{a}_{i}}{{M}_{zij}} \\ \end{align} \right]}$ (3)
Figure 1. Doubletrack dynamics model
The trajectory of the vehicle is determined based on the position of the center of gravity of the vehicle. Therefore, these values need to be calculated.
$X=\int{vcos\left( \alpha +\psi \right)dt}$ (4)
$Y=\int{vsin\left( \alpha +\psi \right)dt}$ (5)
The value of the slip angle a can be calculated according to (6):
$\alpha =arctan\frac{{{v}_{y}}}{{{v}_{x}}}$ (6)
2.2 Determine the forces of the tires
The value of the longitudinal force F_{x}, lateral force F_{y}, and moment M_{z} are the function that depends on the vertical force F_{z} of the tires.
${{F}_{x}},{{F}_{y}},{{M}_{z}}=f\left( {{F}_{z}} \right)$ (7)
To determine these values, the Pacejka tire model is used in this study [25].
The longitudinal force of the wheels:
${{F}_{x}}={{D}_{x}}sin\left( {{C}_{x}}arctan\left[ \begin{align} & {{B}_{x}}(1{{E}_{x}})({{s}_{x}}+{{S}_{hx}})+ \\ & {{E}_{x}}arctan\left\{ {{B}_{x}}({{s}_{x}}+{{S}_{hx}}) \right\} \\ \end{align} \right] \right)+{{S}_{vx}}$ (8)
The lateral force of the wheels:
${{F}_{y}}={{D}_{y}}sin\left( {{C}_{y}}arctan\left[ \begin{align} & {{B}_{y}}(1{{E}_{y}})(\alpha +{{S}_{hy}})+ \\ & {{E}_{y}}arctan\left\{ {{B}_{y}}(\alpha +{{S}_{hy}}) \right\} \\ \end{align} \right] \right)+{{S}_{vy}}$ (9)
The moment of the wheels:
${{M}_{z}}={{D}_{z}}sin\left( {{C}_{z}}arctan\left[ \begin{align} & {{B}_{z}}(1{{E}_{z}})(\alpha +{{S}_{hz}})+ \\ & {{E}_{z}}arctan\left\{ {{B}_{z}}(\alpha +{{S}_{hz}}) \right\} \\ \end{align} \right] \right)+{{S}_{vz}}$ (10)
The coefficients B, C, D, E, s, and S are referenced in [26]. The value of the vertical force F_{z} is calculated based on the spatial dynamics model of the vehicle.
2.3 Determine the vertical force
To calculate the vertical force of the wheels, the spatial dynamics model of the vehicle is established [27, 28].
The equations describe the oscillation of the vehicle with 7 degrees of freedom in space as below (Figure 2):
$m\ddot{z}={{F}_{C11}}+{{F}_{K11}}+{{F}_{C12}}+{{F}_{K12}}+{{F}_{C21}}+{{F}_{K21}}+{{F}_{C22}}+{{F}_{K22}}$ (11)
$\begin{align} & \left( {{I}_{x}}+m{{h}^{2}} \right)\ddot{\varphi }=\left( {{F}_{C11}}+{{F}_{K11}}{{F}_{C12}}{{F}_{K12}} \right){{t}_{w1}}+ \\ & \left( {{F}_{C21}}+{{F}_{K21}}{{F}_{C22}}{{F}_{K22}} \right){{t}_{w2}}+\left( gsin\varphi +{{a}_{y}}cos\varphi \right)mh \\ \end{align}$ (12)
$\begin{align} & \left( {{I}_{y}}+mh_{1}^{2} \right)\ddot{\theta }=\left( {{F}_{C11}}+{{F}_{K11}}+{{F}_{C12}}+{{F}_{K12}} \right){{a}_{1}} \\ & \left( {{F}_{C21}}+{{F}_{K21}}+{{F}_{C22}}+{{F}_{K22}} \right){{a}_{2}} \\ \end{align}$ (13)
${{m}_{ij}}{{\ddot{\xi }}_{ij}}={{F}_{KTij}}{{F}_{Cij}}{{F}_{Kij}}$ $i,j=\overline{1,2}$ (14)
where:
${{F}_{Cij}}={{C}_{ij}}\left[ {{{\dot{\xi }}}_{ij}}\dot{z}+{{\left( 1 \right)}^{i}}{{b}_{i}}\dot{\varphi } \right]$ $i,j=\overline{1,2}$ (15)
${{F}_{Kij}}={{K}_{ij}}\left[ {{\xi }_{ij}}z+{{\left( 1 \right)}^{i}}{{b}_{i}}\varphi \right]$ $i,j=\overline{1,2}$ (16)
${{F}_{KTij}}={{K}_{Tij}}\left( {{u}_{ij}}{{\xi }_{ij}} \right)$ $i,j=\overline{1,2}$ (17)
Figure 2. Spatial dynamics model
3.1 Simulation conditions
The simulation process is done in three different moving conditions: Jturn, Change lane, and Fishhook. Under each of the above conditions, the vehicle will perform 2wheels steer and 4wheels steer at different speeds.
+ Case 1: d_{11} = d_{12 }= 3^{0}, d_{21} = d_{22 }= 0^{0}, v = 50 (km/h)
+ Case 2: d_{11} = d_{12 }= 3^{0}, d_{21} = d_{22 }= 0^{0}, v = 60 (km/h)
+ Case 3: d_{11} = d_{12 }= 3^{0}, d_{21} = d_{22 }= 0^{0}, v = 70 (km/h)
+ Case 4: d_{11} = d_{12 }= 3^{0}, d_{21} = d_{22 }= 1^{0}, v = 50 (km/h)
+ Case 5: d_{11} = d_{12 }= 3^{0}, d_{21} = d_{22 }= 1^{0}, v = 60 (km/h)
+ Case 6: d_{11} = d_{12 }= 3^{0}, d_{21} = d_{22 }= 1^{0}, v = 70 (km/h)
Specifications of the vehicle are given as in Table 1.
Table 1. Specifications of the vehicle
Symbol 
Value 
Unit 
a_{1} 
1100 
mm 
a_{2} 
1600 
mm 
b_{1} 
700 
mm 
b_{2} 
710 
mm 
C_{11}/C_{12} 
2000 
Ns/m 
C_{21}/C_{22} 
1800 
Ns/m 
h 
500 
mm 
I_{x} 
700 
kgm^{2} 
I_{y} 
2000 
kgm^{2} 
I_{z} 
2150 
kgm^{2} 
K_{11}/K_{12} 
34000 
N/m 
K_{21}/K_{22} 
30000 
N/m 
K_{T11}/K_{T12} 
120000 
N/m 
K_{T21}/K_{T22} 
120000 
N/m 
m 
1700 
kg 
M 
1900 
kg 
m_{ij} 
50 
kg 
t_{w1} 
715 
mm 
t_{w2} 
720 
mm 
3.2 Results
The trajectory of the vehicle when steering Jturn type is shown in graph Figure 3. From the graph, it can be seen that:
+ With the same value of the steering angle, if the velocity is larger, the trajectory is larger.
+ With the same value of the velocity, if the vehicle steers 4wheels, the trajectory will be larger than steers 2wheels.
Therefore, the 4wheels steering system can improve stability and limit the oversteering phenomenon when steering Jturn type at high speed.
Figure 3. The trajectory of the vehicle when steering Jturn type
The graph in Figure 4 shows the difference in trajectories when steering Change lane type of the above cases.
+ With the same value of the steering angle, if the velocity is larger, the trajectory is larger.
+ With the same value of the velocity, if the vehicle steers 4wheels, the trajectory (lateral) will be larger than steers 2wheels.
Therefore, the 4wheels steering system can improve stability and limit the understeering phenomenon when steering change lane type at high speeds.
Figure 4. The trajectory of the vehicle when steering Change lane type
Usually, the steering Fishhook type can make instability and danger of the vehicle. Figure 5 shows the trajectory of the vehicle when steering Fishhook type at different speeds. In general, when the vehicle is equipped with the 4wheels steering system, the phenomenon of oversteering and understeer will be reduced compared to the conventional 2wheels steering system.
Figure 5. The trajectory of the vehicle when steering Fishhook type
The steering system has a great influence on the safety and stability of the vehicle when steering. To improve safety and limit the oversteering and understeering phenomenon, the 4wheels steering system has been applied to some of today's vehicles. The results of the study have shown that:
+ At the same value of the velocity, the trajectory of the vehicle equipped with the 4wheels steering system will be greater than the conventional 2wheels steering system in the case of steering Jturn type. This helps reduce the risk of rollover caused by oversteering phenomenon (especially at high speeds and large steering angles).
+ At the same value of the velocity, the trajectory (lateral) of the vehicle equipped with the 4wheels steering system will be smaller than the conventional 2wheels steering system. This helps limit the risk of crashing into other obstacles caused by the understeering phenomenon (especially at high speeds).
+ In the case of the vehicle steers Fishhook type, risks of the instability of the vehicle are also significantly improved.
However, the structure and control of the 4wheels steering system are also much more complex than the conventional 2wheels steering system. Therefore, the production costs of these vehicles equipped with this steering system are also quite expensive, unable to reach the majority of users. In the future, the 4wheels steering system could be widely used to improve safety and stability on the move.
a_{1} 
Distance from the center of gravity to the front axle, m 
a_{2} 
Distance from the center of gravity to the rear axle, m 
b_{1} 
Half of the distance of the suspension system at the front axle, m 
b_{2} 
Half of the distance of the suspension system at the rear axle, m 
c_{i} 
Distance from the external force to the center of gravity, m 
C_{ij} 
Coefficient of damper, Ns/m 
F_{Cij} 
Force of the damper, N 
F_{i} 
External force, N 
F_{Kij} 
Force of the spring, N 
F_{KTij} 
Force of the tires, N 
F_{xij} 
Longitudinal force, N 
F_{yij} 
Lateral force, N 
F_{zij} 
Vertical force, N 
h 
Distance from the center of gravity to roll axis, m 
I_{x} 
Moment of inertia of the xaxis, kgm^{2} 
I_{y} 
Moment of inertia of the yaxis, kgm^{2} 
I_{z} 
Moment of inertia of the zaxis, kgm^{2} 
K_{ij} 
Stiffness of spring, N/m 
K_{Tij} 
Stiffness of tire, N/m 
M 
Total mass of the vehicle, kg 
m 
Sprung mass, kg 
m_{ij} 
Unsprung mass, kg 
M_{z} 
Moment of the tire, N/m 
t_{w1} 
Half of the track width of the front axle, m 
t_{w2} 
Half of the track width of the rear axle, m 
u_{ij} 
Bump on the road, m 
u_{ij} 
Bump on the road, m 
v 
Equivalent velocity, m/s 
v_{x} 
Longitudinal velocity, m/s 
v_{y} 
Lateral velocity, m/s 
X 
Longitudinal position of the center of gravity, m 
Y 
Lateral position of the center of gravity, m 
Greek symbols 

$\psi$ 
Yaw angle, rad 
$\theta$ 
Pitch angle, rad 
[1] Tandy, D.F., Colborn, J., Bae, J.C., Coleman C., Pascarella, R. (2015). The True definition and measurement of oversteer and understeer. SAE International Journal of Commerical Vehicles, 8(1): 160181. https://doi.org/10.4271/2015011592
[2] Singh, B.P., Yadav, B.K., Singh, L.B., Vishal, B., Yadav, R.K., Yadav, R.P., Srivastav, R. (2015). Advanced four wheel steering system. International Journal of Research in Engineering & Advanced Technology, 3(2): 149153.
[3] Kumar, P.S., Joshi, S., Kumari, N.P. (2019). Design and fabrication of fourwheel steering system for efficient transportation systems. International Journal of Innovative and Exploring Engineering, 8(10): 401407. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.I8430.0881019
[4] Rehan, A., Khan, R., Sarfaraz, A., Sayyed, S., Abid, S., Sharma, K.K. (2017). Design and synthesis of fourwheel steering mechanism. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(4): 1720.
[5] Singh, A., Kumar, A., Chaudhary, R., Singh, R.C. (2014). Study of 4 wheel steering systems to reduce turning radius and increase stability. International Conference of Advance Research and Innovation, Indian, pp. 96102.
[6] Spentzas, K.N., Alkhazali, I., Demic, M. (2001). Dynamics of fourwheelsteering vehicles. Forsch Ingenieurwes, 66: 260266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100100100061
[7] Spentzas, K.N., Alkhazali, I., Demic, M. (2001). Kinematics of fourwheelsteering vehicles. Forsch Ingenieurwes, 66: 211216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100100100060
[8] Chen, W., Zhulin, Z., Zhou, C. (2009). Simulation for the handling and stability of fourwheel steering vehicle based on Matlab/Simulink. 2nd International Conference on Transportation Engineering, China, pp. 19081913. https://doi.org/10.1061/41039(345)316
[9] Postalcioglu, S. (2019). Improvement for four wheel steering system. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9(4): 18761886. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.515846
[10] Gao, L., Jin, L., Wang, F., Zheng, Y., Li, K. (2015). Genetic algorithm–based varying parameter linear quadratic regulator control for fourwheels independent steering vehicle. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(11): 114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015618632
[11] Ping, X., Li, T., Hong, G. (2013). Research on fourwheelsteering automobile based on simulated annealing PID algorithm. 3rd International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Application, Hong Kong, pp. 11751178. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDEA.2012.277
[12] Jin, L., Gao, L., Jiang, Y., Chen, M., Zheng, Y., Li, K. (2017). Research on the control and coordination of fourwheel independent driving/steering Electric Vehicle, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(4): 113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017698877
[13] Maoqi, L., Ishak, M.I., Heerwan, P.M. (2019). The effect of parallel steering of a fourwheel drive and fourwheel steer electric vehicle during spinning condition: A numerical simulation. 1st International Postgraduate Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Malaysia, pp. 111. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/469/1/01208
[14] Liu, T., Jia, L.N., Yang, N., Li, C.S. (2019). Research on the handling stability of fourwheel steering vehicle. Journal of Physics, 1213(5): 16. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1213/5/052039
[15] Xu, F.X., Liu, X.H., Chen, W., Zhou, C., Cao, B.W. (2019). Improving handling stability performance of fourwheel steering vehicle based on the H2/H∞ robust control. Applied Sciences, 9(5): 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050857
[16] Yim, S. (2020). Comparison among active front, front independent, 4wheel and 4wheel independent steering systems for vehicle stability control. Electronics, 9(5): 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9050798
[17] Liu, R., Wei, M., Sang, N., Wei, J. (2020). Research on curved path tracking control for fourwheel steering vehicle considering road adhesion coefficient. Mathematic Problems in Engineering, 2020: 118. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3108589
[18] Ye, M., Wang, Q., Jiao, S. (2014). Robust H2/H∞ control for the electrohydraulic steering system of a fourwheel vehicle. Mathematic Problems in Engineering, 2014: 112. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/208019
[19] Yang, Z., Li, Gi., He, H., Li, G. (2017). Study on road feeling simulation control algorithm for fourwheel independent drive and steering electric vehicle. Chinese Automation Congress, Jinan, China, pp. 48724875. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC.2017.8243641
[20] Lai, X., Chen, X., Wu, X., Liang, D. (2015). A study on control system for fourwheels independent driving and steering electric vehicle. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 701702: 807811. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.701702.807
[21] Oksanen, T., Linkolehto, R. (2013). Control of four wheels steering using independent actuators. 4th IFAC Conference on Modelling and Control in Agriculture, Horticulture and Post Harvest Industry, Finland, pp. 159163. https://doi.org/10.3182/201308282SF3019.00061
[22] Wu, X., Xu, M., Wang, L. (2013). Differential speed steering control for fourwheel independent driving electric vehicle. International Journal of Materials, Mechatronics and Manufacturing, 1(4): 355359. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMMM.2013.V1.77
[23] Tian, J., Ding, J., Tai, Y., Chen, N. (2018). Hierarchical control of nonlinear active fourwheelsteering vehicles. Energies, 11(11): 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11112930
[24] Yin, G.D., Chen, N., Wang, J.X., Wu, L.Y. (2011). A Study on synthesis control for fourwheel steering system to enhance vehicle lateral instability. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 133(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002707
[25] Pacejka, H.B. (2012). Tire and Vehicle Dynamics. ButterworthHeinemann Publishing, Oxford.
[26] Muniandy, V., Samin, P.M., Jamaluddin, H., Rahman, R.A., Bakar, S.A.A. (2017). Double antiroll bar hardwareinloop experiment for active antiroll control system. Journal of Vibroengineering, 19(4): 28862909. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17045
[27] Nguyen, T.A., Hoang, T.B. (2020). Research on determining the limited roll angle of vehicle. International Conference on Engineering Research and Applications, Vietnam, pp. 613619. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783030374976_70
[28] Nguyen, T.A., Hoang, T.B. (2019). Research on dynamic model equipped active stabilizer bar. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 4(4): 271275. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj040434