Julie Golliot
OPEN ACCESS
Among people with cognitive deficits, those with a dysexecutive syndrome are waiting for new rehabilitation solutions. Based on an extensive literature analysis, a multidisciplinary consortium has been created to specify and develop S’TIM, a therapeutic and persuasive Serious-Game played on a 48 inches robotised touch-table, which immerses patients in a virtual world through an elaborated scenario and various missions. This device has three main stakes. First, to break anosognosia so each patient could be intrinsically motivated and the actor of his own rehabilitation. Then, to achieve enough metacognition enabling the patients to build their own strategies and to select the most appropriate one in each situation. Finally, to facilitate the transfer of these strategies into everyday life. Changes in the schedule of therapists are also expected.
cognitive rehabilitation, dysexecutive syndrome, touch-table, metacognition, serious game, organisation change
[1] Golliot J, Abellard A, Fontugne E, Herrera C, Timsit M, et. Durampart, Un Nouveau Dispositif de Rééducation dans l’Univers des Troubles "Dys": S’TIM, le Serious-Game Persuasif Thérapeutique Conçu pour les Patients Dysexécutifs, p. 7.
[2] Habib M. (2014). Laa constellation des dys : Bases Neurologiques de l’Apprentissage et de Ses Troubles, 1re éd. Paris: De Boeck.
[3] Godefroy O, Jeannerod M, Allain P, Le Gall D. (2008). Lobe frontal, fonctions exécutives et controle cognitif. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 164(3): S119‑S127.
[4] Diamond A. (2013). Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol 64: 135‑168.
[5] Houdé O. (2016). Éducation et développement cognitif de l’enfant, Education and the child’s cognitive development. Ann. Mines - Réal. Ind(2): 54‑56.
[6] Baddeley A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol 63(1): 1‑29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
[7] Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. (2000). The Unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognit. Psychol 41(1): 49‑100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
[8] Godefroy O. et GREFEX (2004). Syndromes frontaux et dysexécutifs. Rev Neurol, Paris, 899‑909.
[9] Poncet F, Taillefer C, Chevignard M, Picq C, Pradat-Diehl P. (2009). Évaluations écologiques du syndrome dysexécutif: un défi de taille pour l’ergothérapie. Lett. Médecine Phys. Réadapt 25(2): 88‑98.
[10] Rode G, et al. (2005). Évaluation des incapacités et de la qualité de vie des patients présentant des troubles cognitifs. Ann. Réadapt. Médecine Phys 48(6): 376‑391.
[11] Shallice T, Burgess PW. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain 114(2): 727‑741. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.2.727
[12] Chevignard M, Taillefer C, Picq C, Pradat-Diehl P. (2008). Évaluation écologique des fonctions exécutives chez un patient traumatisé crânien. Ann. Réadapt. Médecine Phys 51(2): 74‑83.
[13] Virole B. (2003). Du bon usage des jeux vidéo. Paris: Hachette.
[14] Wierzbicki C. (2012). Des jeux et des clics pour la remédiation cognitive, Summary. Enfances Psy (55): 69‑78.
[15] Tarpin-Bernard F, Croisile B. (2012). Conditions for maximizing effects of 90 days of brain training. Scientific Brain Training.
[16] Klinger E, Chemin I, Lebreton S, MariéRM. (2006). Virtual action planning in Parkinson’s disease: a control study. Cyberpsychology Behav. Impact Internet Multimed. Virtual Real. Behav. Soc 9(3): 342‑347.
[17] Vygotsky LS. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, Gauvain & Cole, New York, 34‑40.
[18] Flavell J, Wellman H. (1977). Metamemory. R.V. Kail & J.W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition, NJ : Erlbaum, 3‑33.
[19] Premack D, Woodruff G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci 1(04): 515.
[20] Ryan R, Deci E. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of Self-determination Research, University Rochester Press, 3‑33.
[21] Deci EL, Ryan RM. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
[22] Alvarez J, Djaouti D. (2012). Introduction au Serious Game / Serious Game : An introduction, 2e Revue et augmentée. Questions Théoriques.
[23] Courbet D, Fourquet-Courbet MP. (2015). Les serious games, dispositifs de communication persuasive: quels processus socio-cognitifs et socio-affectifs dans les usages? Quels effets sur les joueurs? Etat des recherches et nouvelles perspectives», Réseaux 33(194): 199-228.
[24] Lee KM, Peng W, Park N. (2009). Effects of Computer/Video Games and Beyond. Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, London and New York: Routledge, 551–566.
[25] Annetta LA. (2010). The “I’s” have it: A framework for serious educational game design. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14(2): 105‑112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018985
[26] Kato PM. (2010). Video games in health care: Closing the gap. Rev. Gen. Psychol 14(2): 113‑121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019441
[27] Csikszentmihalyi M. (2002). Flow: The psychology of happiness: The classic work on how to achieve happiness, new Ed edition. London etc. Rider.
[28] Barroy W, Durampart M, Bonfils P. (2016). Les dispositifs numériques de formation : Un enjeu de changements organisationnels. MTO, Presse des Mines.