Study of segmentation-classification interactions within a multi-paradigm framework for remote sensing image analysis

Study of segmentation-classification interactions within a multi-paradigm framework for remote sensing image analysis

Andrés Troya-Galvis Pierre Gançarski Laure Berti-Équille 

ICube, Université de Strasbourg 300 bd Sébastien Brant - CS 10413 - F-67412 Illkirch Cedex, France

Qatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar

Espace-Dev UMR 228, IRD - Université de Montpellier, 500 Rue J.F. Breton, 34090 Montpellier, France

Corresponding Author Email: 
troyagalvis@unistra.fr; gancarski@unistra.fr; lberti@qf .org.qa; Laure.Berti@ird.fr
Page: 
133-152
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.3166/RIA.31.133-152
Received: 
| |
Accepted: 
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Segmentation and classification tasks are closely related in the remote sensing image analysis domain. Collaborative approaches allow interactions between segmentation and classification techniques in order to mutually improve both results. In this article we present a generic collaborative framework for segmentation and classification of remote sensing images, and we make an exploratory study comparing a large number of collaboration strategies in order to better understand the interactions between these paradigms.

Keywords: 

segmentation, classification, remote sensing image analysis

1. Introduction
2. Le cadre collaboratif CoSC
3. Implémentation du processus CoSC
4. Étude du comportement de CoSC en fonction de ses paramètres
5. Discussion
6. Conclusion
Remerciements

Ces travaux de recherche ont été financés par l’Agence Nationale de la Recherche dans le cadre du projet COCLICO (ANR-12-MONU-0001).

  References

Achanta R., Shaji A., Smith K., Lucchi A., Fua P., Süsstrunk S. (2012). SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, p. 2274–2282.

Belarte B., Wemmert C., Forestier G., Grizonnet M., Weber C. (2013). Learning fuzzy rules to characterize objects of interest from remote sensing images. 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS, p. 2986-2989.

Binaghi E., Brivio P. A., Ghezzi P., Rampini A. (1999). A fuzzy set-based accuracy assessment of soft classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 20, no 9, p. 935 - 948.

Blaschke T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 65, p. 2–16.

Chow C. (1970). On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 16, no 1, p. 41-46.

Coppin P., Jonckheere I., Nackaerts K., Muys B., Lambin E. (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 25, p. 1565–1596.

Farmer M., Jain A. (2005). A wrapper-based approach to image segmentation and classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 14, p. 2060–2072.

Gao Y., Mas J. F., Kerle N., Navarrete Pacheco J. A. (2011). Optimal region growing segmentation and its effect on classification accuracy. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 32, no 13, p. 3747–3763.

Haykin S. (1998). Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation (2nd éd.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, Prentice Hall PTR.

Hulten G., Spencer L., Domingos P. (2001). Mining time-changing data streams. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - SIGKDD, p. 97–106.

Lacoste C., Descombes X., Zerubia J. (2010). Unsupervised line network extraction in remote sensing using a polyline process. Pattern Recognition, vol. 43, no 4, p. 1631 - 1641.

Liasis G., Stavrou S. (2016). Building extraction in satellite images using active contours and colour features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 37, no 5, p. 1127–1153.

Musci M., Feitosa R., Costa G. (2013, April). An object-based image analysis approach based on independent segmentations. Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE), p. 275-278.

Pham H. M., Yamaguchi Y., Bui T. Q. (2011). A case study on the relation between city planning and urban growth using remote sensing and spatial metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 100, p. 223–230.

Sellaouti A., Hamouda A., Deruyver A., Wemmert C. (2012). Hierarchical classification-based region growing (HCBRG): a collaborative approach for object segmentation and classification. International Conference Image Analysis and Recognition, p. 51–60.

Troya Galvis A., Gancarski P., Berti-Équille L. (2016). Un cadre collaboratif pour la segmentation et la classification d’images de télédétection. Extraction et Gestion des Connaissances (EGC 2016).

Troya-Galvis A., Gançarski P., Passat N., Berti-Équille L. (2015, mai). Unsupervised quantification of under and over segmentation for object based remote sensing image analysis. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 8, no 5, p. 1936–1945.

Unsalan C., Sirmacek B. (2012, Nov). Road network detection using probabilistic and graph theoretical methods. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 50, no 11, p. 4441-4453.

Westen C. V. (2013). Remote Sensing and GIS for Natural Hazards Assessment and Disaster Risk Management. Treatise on geomorphology, p. 259–298. Academic Press.

Zhang H., Fritts J. E., Goldman S. A. (2003). An entropy-based objective evaluation method for image segmentation. Electronic imaging 2004, p. 38–49.