Comparison between geopolymer reaction and cement hydration in solidification of fly ash generated in municipal solid waste incineration

Comparison between geopolymer reaction and cement hydration in solidification of fly ash generated in municipal solid waste incineration

Lei ZhengXia Zhou Xinyi Zhang 

School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource-oriented Treatment of Industrial Pollutants,Beijing 100083, China

Corresponding Author Email: 
zhengl@ustb.edu.cn
Page: 
395-403
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.3166/ RCMA.28.395-403
| |
Published: 
30 September 2018
| Citation

ACCESS

Abstract: 

This paper compares two techniques that solidify the fly ash generated in municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), namely, the geopolymer reaction and the cement hydration. The comparison focuses on the difference between solidified bodies in strength and heavy metal phases. Taking compressive strength as the indicator, the author investigated how the dosages of alkali activator and sodium silicate affect the solidified body of the geopolymer reaction, and contrasted the strengths of solidified products from geopolymer reaction and cement hydration of MSWI fly ash under the same cost of agents. In addition, the Netherlands leaching test program NVN 7431 was adopted to explore the impacts of geopolymer reaction and cement hydration on the occurrence phases of heavy metals in the MSWI fly ash. The results show that the optimal parameters of geopolymer reaction solidification are Na/FA = 2.8mol/kg and 2Na2SiO3/FA = 0.2mol/kg. Under these parameters, the 7d strength of the solidified body reached 18.2MPa at the agent cost of RMB 250 yuan per each ton of fly ash. By contrast, the strength of the solidified body after cement hydration at the same agent cost was only 12MPa. It costs RMB 750 yuan/ton for cement hydration to realize the same strength. Moreover, the leaching tests reveal that the water-soluble phase and the acid-soluble phase heavy metals were converted into aluminosilicate phase in both geopolymer reaction and cement hydration, indicating that the phase distribution of heavy metals are similar between geopolymer system and cement system. The research findings provide valuable reference to the technical selection for MSWI fly ash treatment under different scenarios and objectives.

Keywords: 

strength, heavy metal phase, cement, geopolymer, municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI), fly ash

1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Results and discussion
4. Conclusions
  References

Eighmy T. T., Eusden J. D. J., Krzanowski J. E. (1995). Comprehensive approach toward understanding element speciation and leaching behavior in municipal solid waste incineration electrostatic precipitator ash. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 29, pp. 629-646.

Jaarsveld J. S. G. V., Deventer J. S. J. V., Lukey G. C. (2003). The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geoppolymers. Material Letter, Vol. 57, No. 7, pp. 1271-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00971-0

Singh T. S., Pant K. K. (2006). Solidification/stabilization of arsenic containing solid wastes using Portland cement, fly ash and polymeric materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 131, No. 1-3, pp. 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.046

Sung H. J., Kamiya K., Noda R., Horio M. (2005). Mineralogical stabilization of heavy metals from alkali melting furnace fly ash by thermal treatment with adjustment of its chemical composition. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, Vol. 38, No. 12, pp. 1054-1068. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.38.1054

Temuujin J., Riessen A. V. (2009). Effect of fly ash preliminary calcination on the properties of geopolymer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 164, No. 2-3, pp. 634-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.065

Temuujin J., Williams R. P., Riessen A. V. (2009). Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209, No. 12-13 pp. 5276-5280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.016

Xu J. Z., Zhou Y. L., Chang Q., Wu H. Q. (2006). Study on the factors of affecting the immobilization of heavy metals in fly ash-based geopolymers. Materials Letters, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 820-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.019

Zhang J. G., Provis J. L., Feng D. W., Deventer J. S. J. V. (2008). Geopolymers for immobilization of Cr6+, Cd2+, and Pb2+. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 157, No. 2-3, pp. 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.053

Zhang Y. S., Sun W., Chen Q. L., Chen L. (2007). Synthesis and heavy metal immobilization behaviors of slag based geopolymer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 143, No. 1-2, pp. 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.033

Zheng L., Wang C. W., Wang W., Shi Y. C., Gao X. B. (2011). Immobilization of MSWI fly ash through geopolymerization: Effects of water-wash. Waste Management. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 311-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.015

Zheng L., Wang W., Shi Y. C. (2010). The effects of alkaline dosage and Si/Al ratio on the immobilization of heavy metals in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash-based geopolymer. Chemosphere, Vol. 79, No. 6, pp. 665-671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.018