Seismic Damage Scenarios in the Municipalities of Elche and Alicante (Spain). A first Step to the Emergency Planning

Seismic Damage Scenarios in the Municipalities of Elche and Alicante (Spain). A first Step to the Emergency Planning

S. Molina N. Agea-medina J.J. Galiana-Merino M. Navarro J.A. Huesca A. García- Jerez H. Seivane J.L. Soler-llorens N. Benabdeloued

Dept. Earth Sciences and Environment - Faculty of Sciences - university of Alicante.

MIES Ramóm margalef.

Dept. Physics, Systems Engineering and Signal Theory, Polytechnic School, university of Alicante, Spain.

Dept. chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, university of Almería, Spain.

Dept. Architectural constructions; Polytechnic School, university of Alicante, Spain.

Dept. Fluid mechanics; Polytechnic university of catalunya, Spain.

9 September 2019
| Citation



South and South-East of Spain are the regions with a higher seismic hazard in Spain. Therefore, a regional normative, focused on the importance of developing seismic emergency planning in many of the municipalities of the Valencian community, was established in 2011. consequently, all the municipalities in Alicante province have to develop a seismic emergency planning. however, only Elche and Alicante have completed the seismic risk analysis and they have started to prepare their emergency plans which will be finished before the end of 2019. This paper shows the main results of the seismic risk analysis carried out in both municipalities. The seismic hazard update in the region has shown that the main earthquake scenarios, which may hit both cities, correspond to the crevillente and the Bajo Segura faults (also responsible for damaging historical earthquakes). In both cases, the urban areas are on a sedimentary deposit, which can reach hundreds of meters so site effects and possible site-building resonance can be important. Additionally, most of the building stock belongs to periods without seis- mic normative, increasing, therefore, their vulnerability and the obtained damage. The mean damage ratio for a magnitude of 5.5 increases from a 0.8% to a 10.3% at Alicante and Elche, respectively. Besides, if the magnitude increases to a 6.5 then the mean damage ratio increases from a 16.6% to a 60.3%. In conclusion, we recommend that the emergency planning developed for both municipalities has to take into consideration that even the occurrence of a probable earthquake (475 yrs return period) corresponding to a mw 5.5 will affect both cities so the procedures and protocols should be written in close cooperation.


seismic risk, emergency planning, vulnerability, site effects, seismic hazard.


[1] Gaspar-Escribano, J.M., Navarro, M., Benito, B., Garcia-Jerez, A. & Vidal, F., From regional- to local-scale seismic hazard assessment: examples from Southern Spain. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(6), pp. 1547–1567, 2010.

[2] Sandi, H., Seismic vulnerability and seismic intensity. Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2, Athens, Greece, 1982.

[3] Barbat, A.H., Moya, Y.F. & Canas, J.A., Damage scenarios simulation for seismic risk assessment in urban zones. Earthquake Spectra, 12(3), pp. 371–394, 1996.

[4] Coburn, A. & Spence, R., Earthquake Protection, 2nd edn., John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp. 1–420, 2002.

[5] Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J.J., Restrepo-Velez, L.F. & Crowley, H., Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology, 43(3), pp. 75–104, 2006.

[6] Molina, S., Lang, D.H. & Lindholm, C.D., SELENA—An open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure. Computers & Geosciences, 36(3), pp. 257–269, 2010.

[7] Ordaz, M., Martinelli, F., D’Amico, V. & Meletti, C., CRISIS2008: A flexible tool to perform probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. Seismological Research Letters, 84(3), pp. 495–504, 2013.

[8] Lagomarsino, S. & Giovinazzi, S., Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4(4), pp. 415–443, 2006.

[9] IGN-UPM Working Group, Actualización de Mapas de Peligrosidad Sísmica de España 2012. Editorial Centro Nacional de Informacion Geografica, Madrid, pp. 1–267, 2013.

[10] Harmsen, S., Perkins, D. & Frankel A., Deaggregation of probabilistic ground motions in the Central and Eastern United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(1), pp. 1–13. 1999.

[11] Martin-Rojas, I., Alfaro, P. & Estevez, A., 3D geometry of growth strata in a faultpropagation fold: insights into space–time evolution of the Crevillente Fault (Abanilla-Alicante sector), Betic Cordillera, Spain. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 104(5), pp. 1387–1404, 2015.

[12] Stirling, M., Rhoades, D. & Berryman K., Comparison of Earthquake Scaling Relations Derived from data of the Instrumental and Preinstrumental Era. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(2), pp. 812–830, 2002.

[13] Alfaro, P., Andreu, J.M., Bartolome, R., Borque, M.J., Estevez, A., Garcia-Mayordomo, J., Garcia-Tortosa, F.J., Gil, A., Gracia, E., Lo Iacono, C. & Perea, H., The Bajo Segura Fault Zone: active blind thrusting in the Eastern Betic Cordillera (SE Spain). Journal of Iberian Geology, 38(1), pp. 271–284, 2012.

[14] Soler-Llorens, J.L., Galiana-Merino, J.J., Giner-Caturla, J., Jauregui-Eslava, P., Rosa-Cintas, S. & Rosa-Herranz, J., Development and programming of Geophonino: A low cost Arduino-based seismic recorder for vertical geophones. Computers and Geosciences, 94, pp. 1–10, 2016.

[15] Vidal, F., Navarro, M., Aranda, C. & Enomoto, T., Changes in dynamic characteristics of Lorca RC buildings from pre- and post- earthquake vibration data. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(5), pp. 2095–2110, 2014.

[16] Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J. & Kamai, R., Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1025–1055, 2014.

[17] Campbell, K.W. & Bozorgnia, Y., NGA-West2 ground motion model for theaverage horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), pp. 1087–1115, 2014.

[18] EN 1998-1 CEN, Eurocode 8 – Design for Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium, December 2004.

[19] Federal Emergency Management Agency, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA 440. Prepared by Applied Technology Council (ATC-55 Project), Washington, D.C., United States, June 2005.

[20] NCSE, Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente Española, BOE 8 de febrero de 1995, pp. 3936–3980, Madrid, 1994.

[21] NCSE, Real Decreto 997/2002, de 27 de septiembre, por el que se aprueba la Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente: Parte General y de Edificación (NCSE-02), Boletin Oficial del Estado, Vol. 244, pp. 35898–35967, Espana, Ministerio de Fomento, 2002.