An AHP Model for Level Crossing Design

An AHP Model for Level Crossing Design

Danijela Barić Filip Pižeta

University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia

1 January 2018
| Citation



Level crossings (LCs) are places of rail and road intersections, and therefore, areas with increased risk of severe accidents. The main objective of this study is to apply the multi-criteria Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to evaluate the variants for the reconstruction of LCs in an urban environment through weighting of various criteria and sub-criteria. The research methodology is applied on LC Trnava in Zagreb. Four developed variants are presented and evaluated with AHP method. For apply- ing the AHP method the Expert Choice software package has been used. Simulation of the current state and optimal variant is made in PTV VISSIM. This approach may prove useful by the AHP method for evaluating and selecting the appropriate LC designs.


AHP, level crossings, safety

1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. The Ahp Model to Level Crossing Design
4. Simulation of Optimal Variant in Software Tool PTV Vissim
5. Conclusion

[1] Implementation of measures to improve the safety of the most vulnerable traffic participants at level crossings, Internal data, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences University of Zagreb, Department for Road Transport, Zagreb, 2017.

[2] Barić, D., Pilko, H. & Strujić, J., An analytic hierarchy process model to evaluate road section design. Transport, 31(3), pp. 312–321, 2016.

[3] Nowak, M., Investment projects evaluation by simulation and multiple criteria decision aiding procedure. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 11(3), pp. 193–202, 2005.

[4] Barić, D., Čurepić, D. & Radačić, Ž., Implementation of relevant methods in assessing traffic-technological projects. Promet - Traffic&Transportation, 19(5), pp. 329–336, 2007.

[5] Aghdaie, M.H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. & Zavadskas, E.K., Prioritizing constructing projects of municipalities based on AHP and COPRAS-G: a case study about footbridges in Iran. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 7(2), pp. 145–153, 2012.

[6] Podvezko, V., Application of AHP technique. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2), pp. 181–189, 2009.

[7] Saaty, T.L., Transport planning with multiple criteria: the analytic hierarchy process applications and progress review. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 29(1), pp. 81–126, 1995.

[8] Cerić, A., Marčić, D. & Kovačević, M.S., Applying the analytic network process for risk assessment in sustainable ground improvement. GRAĐEVINAR, 65(10), pp. 919–929, 2013.

[9] Karleuša, B., Ožanić, N. & Deluka-Tibljaš, A., Improving decision making in defining priorities for implementation of irritigation plans using AHP methodology. Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette, 21(3), pp. 673–680, 2014.

[10] Gholami, M.H. & Seyyed-Esfahani, M., An integrated framework for competitive market strategy selection by using Fuzzy AHP. Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette, 19(4), pp. 769–780, 2012.

[11] Vidal, L.A., Marle, F. & Bocquet, J.C., Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), pp. 5388–5405, 2011.

[12] Rouyendegh, B.D. & Erkan, T.E., Selection of academic staff using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP): a pilot study. Tehnički vjesnik – Technical Gazette, 19(4), pp. 923–929, 2012.

[13] Saaty, T.L., Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), pp. 83–98, 2008.

[14] Pižeta, F., Project Variants Evaluation of Trnava Level Crossing by Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process, Master thesis, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 2016.