Optimizing Security Policies and Practices in the Port of Antwerp: Actors’ Perceptions and Recommendations

Optimizing Security Policies and Practices in the Port of Antwerp: Actors’ Perceptions and Recommendations

Arne de Boeck Genserik Reniers Marc Cools Marleen Easton Evelien van Den Herrewegen 

Department of Penal Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Universiteitsstraat 4, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Antwerp Research Group on Safety and Security (ARGoSS), University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium

Centre for Economics and Corporate Sustainability (CEDON), HUB, KULeuven, Warmoesberg 26, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Research Group Cris, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Department of Administration and Management, University College Ghent (HoGent), Kortrijksesteenweg 14, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Safety and Security Science, Faculty TPM, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands

Page: 
38-53
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V4-N1-38-53
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

The Port of Antwerp is the second largest harbor in Europe. Security and policing activities within the port area are frequent, diversifi ed and involve many different actors (federal and local goverments, law enforcement agencies, emergency services etc.). To make security measures work, it is not only important that responsibilities and competences of these actors are unambiguously fi xed but also that there is suffi cient cooperation and coordination among them. In this article we extensively analyze existing policy arrangements within the Port of Antwerp region for four security phenomena, that is, port-related crime, threats, emergency situations and events and incidents. To this end, we developed an innovative assessment scheme to analyze and evaluate multi-actor collaborations. Based on extensive in-depth interviewing and actors’ perceptions and points of consideration, in combination with state-ofthe-art insights described in literature, we formulate recommendations on how to improve the present security arrangements situation, within current limitations (short-term), as well as thinking out of the box (long-term).

Keywords: 

Port security, qualitative research, emergency management, crime investigation, threat assessment, event management, policing

  References

[1] Ten Brinke, W.B.M., Saeijs, G.E.M., Helsloot, I. & Van Alphen, J., Safety chain  approach in fl ood risk management. Municipal Engineer, 161(2), pp. 93–102, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/muen.2008.161.2.93

[2] Brewer, G. & de Leon, P., The Foundations of Policy Analysis, Dorsey Press:  Homewood, IL, 1983.

[3] Altiok, T., Port security/safety, risk analysis and modelling. Annals of Operations  Research, 187, pp. 1–3, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0849-8

[4] Crawford, A., The governance of urban safety and the politics of insecurity. Urban Safety: Problems, Governance and Strategies, eds. K. van der Vijver & J. Terpstra, Institute for Social Safety Studies. University of Twente: Enschede, pp. 65–85, 2004.

[5] Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn, Applied Social R esearch Series, Vol. 5, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009.

[6] Van Sluis, A., Marks, P., Gilleir, F. & Easton, M., Nodal security in the ports of  Rotterdam and Antwerp. Beyond Fragmentation and Interconnectivity: Public Governance and the Search for Connective Capacity, eds. M. Fenger & V. Bekkers, IOS Press: Amsterdam, pp. 73–94, 2012.

[7] Sheptycki, J., Organizational pathologies in police intelligence systems: some contributions to the lexicon of intelligence-led policing. European Journal of Criminology, 1(3), pp. 307–332, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0849-8