OPEN ACCESS
Urban air quality has deteriorated in last few decades in the mega cities of both developed and developing coun-tries. Many mathematical models have been widely used as prediction tool for urban air quality management in developed countries. However, applications of these models are limited in developing countries including India due to lack of sufficient validation studies. In this paper, three state-of-the-art air quality models namely AERMOD, ADMS-Urban and ISCST3 have been used to predict the air quality at an intersection in Delhi city, India, followed by their performance evaluation and sensitive analysis under different meteorological condi-tions. The models have been run for different climatic conditions, i.e. summer and winter season to predict the concentration of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and PM2.5 (diameter size less than 2.5 µm). The ISCST3 has performed satisfactorily (d = 0.69) for predicting CO concentrations when compared with AERMOD (d = 0.50) and ADMS-Urban (d = 0.45) for winter period. The ADMS-Urban (d = 0.49) has per-formed satisfactorily for predicting NO2 concentration when compared with ISCST3 (d = 0.36) and AERMOD (d = 0.32). The AERMOD, ISCST3 and ADMS-Urban have performed satisfactorily for predicting PM2.5 con-centrations having d values as 0.46, 0.45 and 0.43 respectively. All three models have performed satisfactorily for predicting CO concentrations when wind speed was in the range of 0.5–3 m/s and wind direction in the range 90–180 degrees, i.e. downwind direction. The difference in model’s performance may be due to differ-ences in model formulation and the treatment of terrain features. The causal nature of these Gaussian based models may be one of the reasons for difference in performance of the models, because these are sensitive to quality and quantity of input data on meteorology and emission sources.
AERMOD, ADMS-Urban, ISCST3, input data, model evaluation, urban air quality management
[1] Gurjar, B.R., Butler, T.M., Lawrence, M.G. & Lelieveld, J., Evaluation of emissions and air quality in megacities. Atmospheric Environment, 42, pp. 1593–1606, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.048
[2] Baldasano, J.M., Valera, E. & Jimenez, P., Air quality data from large cities. The Science of the Total Environment, 307, pp. 141–165, 2003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00537-5
[3] Mayer, H., Air pollution in cities. Atmospheric Environment, 33, pp. 4029–4037, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00144-2
[4] Nagendra, S., Khare, M., Gulia, S., Vijay, P., Chithra, V.S., Bell, M. & Namdeo, A., Applica-tion of ADMS and AERMOD models to study the dispersion of vehicular pollutants in urban areas of India and the United Kingdom. 20th WIT international conference on Air Pollution at Coruna, Spain, doi:10.2495/AIR120011, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/air120011
[5] Sharma, N., Chaudhry, K.K. & Rao, C.V.C., Vehicular pollution modelling in India. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), 85, pp. 46–63, 2005.
[6] Badami, M.G., Urban transport policy as if people and the environment mattered: pedestrian accessibility the first step. Economic & Political Weekly, XLIV(33), pp. 43–51, 2009.
[7] CPCB, Status of vehicular pollution control program in India, Program Objective Series/ PROBES/136, 2010.
[8] Longhurst, J.W.S., Lindley, S.J., Watson, A.F.R. & Conlan, D.E., The introduction of local air quality management in the United Kingdom: a review and theoretical framework. Atmospheric Environment, 30, pp. 3975–3985, 1996. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00114-8
[9] Nagendra, S.M.S. & Khare, M., Line source emission modelling- review. Atmospheric Envi-ronment, 36(13), pp. 2083–2098, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00177-2
[10] CAI-Asia Centre, Country synthesis report on urban air quality management for India. Asian Development Bank and the Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities (CAI-Asia) Center, 2006.
[11] Majumdar, B.K., Dutta, A., Chakrabarty, S. & Ray, S., Correction factors of CALINE 4: a study of automobile pollution in Kolkata. Indian Journal of Air Pollution Control, 8(1), pp. 1–7, 2008.
[12] Bhanarkar, A.D., Goyal, S.K., Sivacoumar, R. & Rao, C.V.C., Assessment of contribution of SO2 and NO2 from different sources in Jamshedpur region, India. Atmospheric Environment, 39, pp. 7745–7760, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.070
[13] U.S. Environment Protection Agency, Federal Register, Part-III, 40 CFR Part 51, Revisions to the guideline on air quality models: Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Com-plex Terrain) Dispersion Model and Other Revisions; Final Rule, 2005.
[14] Carruthers, D.J., Blair, J.W. & Johnson, K.L., Validation and sensitivity study of the ADMS-Urban, TR – 0191, 2003.
[15] Khare, M., Nagendra, S. & Gulia, S., Performance evaluation of air quality dispersion models at urban intersection of an Indian city: a case study of Delhi city. 20th WIT International Conference on Air Pollution at Coruna, Spain, 157, pp. 249–259, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.2495/air120221
[16] Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Varadarajan, C., Vijayan, A. & Masuraha, A., Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area. Environmental Prog-ress, 25(2), pp. 141–151, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.10129
[17] Long, E.L., Cordova, F.J. & Tanrikulu, S., An analysis of AERMOD sensitivity to input parameters in the San Francisco Bay Area. 13th Conference on the Applications of Air Pollu-tion Meteorology with the Air and Waste Management Association, American Meteorological Society, Vancouver, BC, August, 23–25, 2004.
[18] Faulkner, W.B., Shaw, B.W. & Grosch, T., Sensitivity of two dispersion models (AERMOD and ISCST3) to input parameters for a rural ground-level area source. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 58, pp. 1288–1296, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047.3289.58.10.1288
[19] Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants, ADMS-Urban model user guide, 2006.
[20] Mohan, M., Bhati, S. & Marrapu, P., Performance evaluation of AERMOD and ADMS-Urban models in a tropical urban environment. Indian Journal of Air pollution Control, 9(1), pp. 47–62, 2009.
[21] Cimorelli, A.J., Perry, S.G., Venkatram, A., Weil, J.C., Paine, R.J., Wilson, R.B., Lee, R.F., Peters, W.D. & Brod, R.W., AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 44, pp. 683–693, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/jam2227.1
[22] Carruthers, D.J., Blair, J.W. & Johnson, K.L., Validation and sensitivity study of the ADMS-Urban for London. Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants. FM489/R5, 2003.
[23] USEPA, User’s Guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Model (Revised). Volume II - Description of Model Algorithms. EPA-454/b-95-0036, 1995.
[24] Mohan, M. & Kandya, A., An analysis of annual and seasonal trends of air quality index of Delhi. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 131, pp. 267–277, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10661-006-9474-4
[25] Central Pollution Control Board, National ambient air quality status report, www.cpcb.nic.in, 2007.
[26] Goyal, P., Jaiswal, N., Kumar, A., Dadoo, J.K. & Dwarakanath, M., Air quality impact assess-ment of NOx and PM due to diesel vehicles in Delhi. Transportation Research Part D, 15, pp. 298–303, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.03.002
[27] CRRI, Multi-Scale Modelling Platform for Environment Forecasting and Management (CMM0020) (Emission Modelling Component), Central Road Research Institute: New Delhi, 2007.
[28] ARAI, Emission Factor Development for Indian Vehicles. Project Report No.AEF/2006-07/ IOCL/Emission Factor Project, Automotive Research Association of India: Pune, 2007.
[29] Aneja, V.P., Agrawal, A., Roelle, P.A., Philips, S.B., Tong, Q. & Watkins, N., Measurement and analysis of criteria pollutants in New Delhi, India. Environmental Modelling & Software, 27(1), pp. 35–42, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-4120(01)00051-4