Bringing the Integrative Aspect of Sustainable Development into Community Natural Resource Management: The Case of Agricultural Land Use in Limpopo, South Africa

Bringing the Integrative Aspect of Sustainable Development into Community Natural Resource Management: The Case of Agricultural Land Use in Limpopo, South Africa

C. MUSVOTO K. NORTJE M. MURAMBADORO 

Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Natural Resources and the Environment, South Africa

Page: 
445–463
|
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V9-N3-445–463
Received: 
N/A
| |
Accepted: 
N/A
| | Citation

OPEN ACCESS

Abstract: 

Rural communities in South Africa manage natural resources under conditions of resource degradation driven by unsustainable practices. This is against a backdrop of the country adopting the principle of sustainable devel-opment and putting in place policies to facilitate integrated decision making, which is pivotal to sustainable development. Sustainable development is an integrative concept with a basis in a ‘whole systems approach’. There are no tools tailored to facilitate integration in community level decision making in South Africa and there is need to develop such tools. In line with the stakeholder approach, users have to be involved in the development of the tools and inform their content. The question is whether community level users are able to adequately inform such tools. The objective of this study was to assess the input of potential community level users into development of a decision support tool for improving integration in natural resource management (specifically agricultural land use) decision making. Stakeholder analysis was used to identify decision makers and their responsibilities and elucidate decision-making processes, criteria, context and characteristics of the tool. The main findings were that (i) community agricultural land use decisions focus on addressing social and economic needs with no consideration for the environment; (ii) users visualised the tool as a set of guidelines for enabling equal consideration of social, economic and environmental factors and expected it to facilitate group decision making, communication and participation of different stakeholders in decision making. Stake-holder expectations for the tool were different. Stakeholder analysis was used to accommodate these different perspectives and reach consensus on issues. Stakeholders were able to provide integral information to develop-ing a tool that is both acceptable to users and addresses the integration principle of sustainable development.

Keywords: 

Agricultural land use, decision-making, integration, natural resources, support, sustainable, tool, utilisation

  References

[1] Zulu, L.C., Community forest management in Southern Malawi: solution or part of the prob-lem? Society and Natural Resources, 21, pp. 687–703, 2008.

[2] Taylor, R., Community based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, pp. 2563–2583, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10531-009-9612-8

[3] Bennett, J., Ainslie, A. & Davis, J. Fenced in: common property struggles in the management of communal rangelands in central Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Land Use Policy, 27, pp. 340–350, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.006

[4] Kanapaux, W. & Child, B., Livelihood activities in a Namibian wildlife conservancy: a case study of variation within a CBNRM programme. Orynx, 45, pp. 365–372, 2011.

[5] Mbaiwa, J.E., Stronza, A. & Kreuter, U., From collaboration to conservation: insights from the Okavango delta, Botswana. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 24, pp. 400–411, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941921003716745

[6] Limpopo overview state of the environment, 2003. Available at http://www.environment.gov. za/soer/reports/limpopo/Limpopo.pdf (accessed 12 March 2012).

[7] Limpopo Department of Finance and Economic Development, Limpopo State of the Environ-ment Report (Phase 1), 2004. Available at http://soer.deat.gov.za/dm_documents/Limpopo_ State_of_environment_reporting_phase_1___UrZKg.pdf (accessed 12 March 2012).

[8] Makhado Local Municipality, Integrated Development Plan 2010/11 IDP Review, pp. 43–44, 2010.

[9] Republic of South Africa, The National Environmental Management Act (Act No 107 of 1998). Government Printer, Pretoria, 1998.

[10] DEAT  (Department  of  Environmental  Affairs  and  Tourism),  People-planet-prosperity: A National Framework for Sustainable Development in South Africa, 2008.

[11] Giddings, B., Hopwood, B. & O’Brien, G., Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10,pp. 187–196, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.199

[12] Drexhage, J. & Murphy, D., Sustainable development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012 back-ground paper prepared for consideration by the high level panel on global sustainability at its first meeting, 2010. Available at http://www.un.org/wcm/webdav/site/climatechange/shared/ gsp/docs/GSP1-6_Background%20on%20Sustainable%20Devt.pdf (accessed 3 October 2012).

[13] United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Integrated Policymaking for Sustainable Development. A reference manual. 2009. Available at http://www.unep.ch/etb/publications/ IPSD%20manual/UNEP%20IPSD%20final.pdf (accessed 14 October 2012).

[14] Hardi, P. &Zdan, T., Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practice. International Institute for Sustainable Development, pp. 12–13, 1997. Available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/ bellagio.pdf (accessed 9 October 2012).

[15] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). Report of the Unit-ed Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992. Annex I. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. Available at http://www. un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm (accessed 29 March 2012).

[16] Musvoto, C. Nortje, K., Murambadoro, M. & Dube, S., Relevance of national and local gov-ernment policy to sustainable community natural resource management in South Africa. The Sustainable City VII, eds. M. Pacetti, G. Passerini, C.A. Brebbia, & G. Latini, WIT Press: Southampton and Boston, 1, pp. 317–328, 2012.

[17] Schwilch, G., Bachmann, F. & de Graaff, J., Decision support for selecting SLM technologies with stakeholders. Applied Geography, 34, pp. 86–98, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. apgeog.2011.11.002

[18] Walker, D.H. & Zhu, X., Decision support for rural resource management. Deepening the Basis of Rural Resource Management: Proceedings of a Workshop, eds. I. Guijt, J.A. Berdegué, & M. Loevinsohn, International Service for National Agricultural Research and red Internacional de Metodología de Investigación de Sistemas de Producción: The Netherlands, pp. 23–35, 2000.

[19] Walker, D.H., Decision support, learning and rural resource management. Agricultural Systems, 73, pp. 113–127, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00103-2

[20] Guariso, G. & Werthner, H., Environmental Decision Support Systems. Ellis Horwood-Wiley: New York, 1989.

[21] Rizzoli, A.E. & Young, W.J., Delivering environmental decision support systems: software tools and techniques. Environmental Modelling and Software, 12, pp. 237–239, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(97)00016-9

[22] Giupponi, C., Decision support systems for implementing the European water framework direc-tive: the MULINO approach. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, pp. 248–258, 2007. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.024

[23] Kellon, D. & Arvai, J., Five propositions for improving decision making about the environment in developing communities: insights from the decision sciences. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, pp. 363–371, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.010

[24] Freeman, R.E., Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman: Boston, 1984.

[25] Grimble, R. & Wellard, K., Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities, Agricultural Systems, 55, pp. 173–193, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1

[26] Callahan, S., How to use stories to size up a situation. Anecdote, Pty. Ltd., 2004. Available at http:// dfaq.uct.ac.za/ngambi/Papers-reworking/Narrative_to_size_up_situation%20-%20SCallahan

.pdf (accessed 28 March 2012).

[27] Pound, B., Snapp, S., McDougall, C. & Braun, A. (eds.), Managing Natural Resources for Sustain-able Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation, Earthscan/IDRC: London, pp. 1–15, 2003.

[28] McIntosh, B.S., Ascough II, J.C., Twery, M., Chew, J., Elmahdi, A., Haase, D., Harou, J.J., Hepting, D., Cuddy, S., Jakeman, A.J., Chen, S., Kassahun, A., Lautenbach, S., Matthews, K., Quinn, N.W.T., Merritt, W., Rodriguez-Roda, I., Sieber, S., Stavenga, M., Sulis, A., Ticehurst, J., Volk, M., Wrobel, M., van Delden, H., El-Sawah, S., Rizzoli, A. & Voinov, A., Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - challenges and best practices. Envi-ronmental Modelling & Software, 26, pp. 1389–1402, 2011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. envsoft.2011.09.009

[29] Ramirez, R., Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. Confl ict and Collaboration in Natural Resource Management, ed. D. Buckles, Improved Data Recording Capability.and the World Bank: Ottawa and Washington, pp. 101–126, 1999. Available at http://web.idrc.ca/ev-27971-201-1-DO TOPIC.html (accessed 14 October 2012).

[30] Grimble, R. & Wellard, K., Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems, 55, pp. 173–193, 1997. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1

[31] Mushove, P. & Vogel, C., Heads or tails? Stakeholder analysis as a tool for conservation area management. Global Environmental Change, 15, pp. 184–198, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.008

[32] Oliver, C.D. & Twery, M.J., Decision support systems/models and analyses. Ecological Stew-ardship – a Common Reference for Ecosystem Management, Vol. 3, eds. W.T. Sexton, A.J. Malk, R.C. Szaro, & N.C. Johnson, Elsevier: Oxford, pp. 661–686, 1999.

[33] Rauscher, H.M., Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 114, pp. 173–197, 1999. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00350-8

[34] Ellis, E.A., Bentrup, G. & Schoeneberger, M.M., Computer-based tools for decision support in agroforestry: current state and future needs. Agroforestry Systems, 61, pp. 401–421, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029015.64463.65

[35] Reed, M.S., Graves, A., Dandy, N. Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, H. & Stringer, L.C., Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natu-ral resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 1933–1949, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001

[36] Rolling, N.G. & Jiggins, J., The ecological knowledge system. Social Learning for Sustainable Agriculture, eds. N.G. Rolling & M.A. Wagemakers, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,

pp. 283–307, 1997.

[37] Rist, S., Chidambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U. & Zimmermann, A., Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, pp. 23–37, 2006. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006

[38] Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Hahn, T., Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Swe-den. Ecology and Society, 9(4), p. 2, 2004. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol9/iss4/art/2 (accessed 12 October 2012).

[39] Berkes, F., Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and management systems, Taylor and Francis: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA and London, UK, 1999.

[40] Prell, C., Hubacek, K. & Reed, M., Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natu-ral resource management. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 22, pp. 501–518, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802199202

[41] ODA (Overseas Development Administration), Guidance note on how to do stakeholder analy-sis of aid projects and programmes, 1995. Available at http://www.sswm.info/sites/default/ files/reference_attachments/ODA%201995%20Guidance%20Note%20on%20how%20to%20 do%20a%20Stakeholder%20Analysis.pdf (accessed 12 October 2012).

[42] Republic of South Africa, The Communal Property Associations Act (Act No. 28 of 1996), Government Printer, Pretoria, 1996.

[43] The World Bank, Participation sourcebook. Washington, DC, USA,p. 276, 1996.

[44] Sen, S., Involving stakeholders in aquaculture policy-making, planning and management. Aquaculture in the Third Millennium, eds. R.P. Subasinghe, P. Bueno, M.J. Phillips, C. Hough, S.E. McGladdery & J.R. Arthur, pp. 83–94. Technical Proceedings of the Conference on Aqua-culture in the Third Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand, 20–25 February 2000. Bangkok, NACA, and Rome, FAO, 2001. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/AB412E/ab412e32.htm (accessed 11 October 2012).

[45] Nortje, K., Musvoto, C. & Murambadoro, M., Elim Workshop Proceedings: improving coordina-tion and integration of agricultural land use in restitution areas of Makhado Municipality, 2011, The Elim Workshop, Elim, Makhado Municipality, Limpopo Province, 29 August–1 September 2011. Available at http://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/handle/10204/5736 (accessed 8 May 2012).

[46] Kepe, T., Cousins, B. & Turner, S., Resource tenure and power relations in community wildlife: the case of Mkambati area, South Africa. Society and Natural Resources, 14, pp. 911–925, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419201753242814

[47] Kull, C.A., Empowering pyromaniacs in Madagascar: ideology and legitimacy in communi-ty-based natural resource management. Development and Change, 33, pp. 57–58, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00240

[48] Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Wollenberg, E. & Edmunds, D., Devolution and community-based natural resource management: creating space for local people to participate and benefit? Overseas Development Institute (ODI), Natural Resource Perspectives No. 76, March 2002. Available at http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/3646/76-devolution-com-munity-based-natural-resource-management.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 27 March 2012).

[49] Warner, M., Conflict management in community-based natural resource projects: experiences from Fiji and Papua New Guinea, Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Working Paper, 135, pp. 17– 19, 2000. Available at http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/2738.pdf (accessed 11 October 2012).

[50] Chevalier, J., Stakeholder analysis and natural resource management. Carleton University: Ottawa, 2001. doi: http://httpserver.carleton.ca/_jchevali/STAKEH2.html (Accessed 10 October 2012).

[51] Billgren, C. & Holmen, H., Approaching reality: comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land Use Policy, 25, pp. 550–562, 2008. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.004

[52] Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13, pp. 319–340, 1989. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008